Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

4 Cripes Sakes, This Has Gone Favre Enough!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Freak Out
    You don't want him and think he is washed up and has been for a long time but think it's nuts to send him to another team. Hell...what happens if he suck and throws 30 ints? Wouldn't that be helping GB?
    FAvre is probably a good player, may even be very good. Just because he doesn't fit into the Packers plans doesn't mean you hand such an asset to your enemy.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
      Originally posted by Freak Out
      You don't want him and think he is washed up and has been for a long time but think it's nuts to send him to another team. Hell...what happens if he suck and throws 30 ints? Wouldn't that be helping GB?
      FAvre is probably a good player, may even be very good. Just because he doesn't fit into the Packers plans doesn't mean you hand such an asset to your enemy.
      So I've heard.
      C.H.U.D.

      Comment


      • #33
        "It was the same old Favre bashing ass/ball/crotch licking winy stuff that's been said a zillion times around here with some 96 and Sherman references thrown in. You don't want him and think he is washed up and has been for a long time but think it's nuts to send him to another team. Hell...what happens if he suck and throws 30 ints? Wouldn't that be helping GB?"


        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


        The point is, it doesn't matter what you and I WANT, it is what the GM and the coach think and do, that matters. Up to this point there isn't too many legit reasons to not trust their judgement.

        The problem with your theory is that Brett Favre sitting on his tractor all week, then flyng into the Humpty Dome on Sundays, still will be more effective than Tavaras Jackson. So, obviously no, that doesn't help GB.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
          Originally posted by Freak Out
          You don't want him and think he is washed up and has been for a long time but think it's nuts to send him to another team. Hell...what happens if he suck and throws 30 ints? Wouldn't that be helping GB?
          FAvre is probably a good player, may even be very good. Just because he doesn't fit into the Packers plans doesn't mean you hand such an asset to your enemy.
          For free, no less.
          "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by son of a vic
            The problem with your theory is that Brett Favre sitting on his tractor all week, then flyng into the Humpty Dome on Sundays, still will be more effective than Tavaras Jackson. So, obviously no, that doesn't help GB.
            You are probably right there....but according to reports from Barney camp Jackson is improving.
            C.H.U.D.

            Comment


            • #36
              Tavaras Jackson is Daunte Culpepper without the fat ass.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by son of a vic
                Tavaras Jackson is Daunte Culpepper without the fat ass.
                Tavaris Jackson is me sans beer. Sign me I say then. I was all Marawood conference QB in high school D4 champs (no really, albeit several years ago). Jackson ain't shit, they'd give us a Hershell-eske deal to get Favre.
                Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

                Comment

                Working...
                X