McCarthy, Thompson To Address Media Today; Watch LIVE

[Partial]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

[SkinBasket]

Yup. I feel ya man.

I felt it too until I took a crap.

[mission]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

Logic, as it's known, usually involves pretty rigid parameters.

In this case, the word "retired" essentially absolves your post of any merit.

Continue ...

[Harlan Huckleby]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

This is a strange comparison.

[SkinBasket]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

Will you please stop trying to equate the two situations? You just sound silly and spiteful. Maybe you and Paco and woody could start a club. It would probably be therapeutic. A little queer, but therapeutic nonetheless.

[Partial]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

Will you please stop trying to equate the two situations? You just sound silly and spiteful. Maybe you and Paco and woody could start a club. It would probably be therapeutic. A little queer, but therapeutic nonetheless.

How exactly is it any different?!?

TT said he doesn't care that Favre bad mouthed him.

He is implying that Favre cannot come back because he missed the off-season. Ryan Grant also missed the off-season. Where exactly is the difference? Clearly its not age since he said he could come back at the end of March.

The sidewinder's ego is the size of texas. He wants a roster chock full of his guys. He wants to be in the spotlight, not have Favre get credit for being a great quarterback.

[mission]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

Will you please stop trying to equate the two situations? You just sound silly and spiteful. Maybe you and Paco and woody could start a club. It would probably be therapeutic. A little queer, but therapeutic nonetheless.

A little, yes... limited to prostate massages only.

The Pacopete, Archer, Woody, partial posts are hilarious... I can just picture some drunk idiot sitting there with a pile of pizza boxes and shit just thrown all over their bedrooms in mom's basement.

well, paco's at least

[BallHawk]

Partial, you fail to see past the fact that Favre retired.

[Harlan Huckleby]

He is implying that Favre cannot come back because he missed the off-season. Ryan Grant also missed the off-season. Where exactly is the difference?

There are a lot of differences, but at the top of the list is that the Packers have a new QB as a result of Favre missing the off-season, and they've decided they don't want to go back to Favre. Ryan Grant is still wanted for the #1 slot.

[mission]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

Will you please stop trying to equate the two situations? You just sound silly and spiteful. Maybe you and Paco and woody could start a club. It would probably be therapeutic. A little queer, but therapeutic nonetheless.

How exactly is it any different?!?

TT said he doesn't care that Favre bad mouthed him.

He is implying that Favre cannot come back because he missed the off-season. Ryan Grant also missed the off-season. Where exactly is the difference? Clearly its not age since he said he could come back at the end of March.

The sidewinder's ego is the size of texas. He wants a roster chock full of his guys. He wants to be in the spotlight, not have Favre get credit for being a great quarterback.

Do you have the intelligence of a 4 year old?

How is it different? Grant is making a business decision and spent all off season in green bay with his teammates and was at OTA's. he didnt retire, he's just trying to secure his future.

brett retired, got excited, wanted to come back... we said no because we think rodgers is a better option (whther you agree or not)

how are those situations even close to the same? seriously... this place is too much sometimes.

[Partial]

Partial, you fail to see past the fact that Favre retired.

So what? Again, he missed the offseason. So did RG. I don't see a difference. He wants to unretire now. Ryan Grant wants to "unretire" and come to camp as well.

The sidewinder won't let them.

[BallHawk]

I'm not even going to try anymore. It's a waste of breath.

Mission, I suggest you do the same. Logical points are useless.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Partial, you fail to see past the fact that Favre retired.

So what? Again, he missed the offseason. So did RG. I don't see a difference.

The difference is that when a player retires, the team takes steps to replace him. And with a QB, this is particularly critical.

[Partial]

The whole "we moved on when he retired" is horrendously weak. That logic should dictate that Ryan Grant cannot play for the Packers anymore. TT is a snake in the grass.

Will you please stop trying to equate the two situations? You just sound silly and spiteful. Maybe you and Paco and woody could start a club. It would probably be therapeutic. A little queer, but therapeutic nonetheless.

How exactly is it any different?!?

TT said he doesn't care that Favre bad mouthed him.

He is implying that Favre cannot come back because he missed the off-season. Ryan Grant also missed the off-season. Where exactly is the difference? Clearly its not age since he said he could come back at the end of March.

The sidewinder's ego is the size of texas. He wants a roster chock full of his guys. He wants to be in the spotlight, not have Favre get credit for being a great quarterback.

Do you have the intelligence of a 4 year old?

How is it different? Grant is making a business decision and spent all off season in green bay with his teammates and was at OTA's. he didnt retire, he's just trying to secure his future.

brett retired, got excited, wanted to come back... we said no because we think rodgers is a better option (whther you agree or not)

how are those situations even close to the same? seriously... this place is too much sometimes.

Actually he didn't practice during OTAs. Favre has worked out all offseason as well. Both are in game shape.

They said no because they moved on, not because Rodgers is better. There IS a difference. They said they moved on because they spent all offseason implementing the new offense.

They are pretty darn similiar situations. Why does everyone take the Sidewinder's side when he is disrespecting the greatest packer ever. Without Favre, the Packers probably wouldn't be around, and the Sidewinder wouldn't have a job.

[Partial]

Partial, you fail to see past the fact that Favre retired.

So what? Again, he missed the offseason. So did RG. I don't see a difference.

The difference is that when a player retires, the team takes steps to replace him. And with a QB, this is particularly critical.

So what? The Packers moved on with Brandon Jackson when Ryan Grant's contracts demands couldn't be met. What is the difference?