Originally posted by BallHawk
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vets want Favre back
Collapse
X
-
"I don't know who else I'm speaking for but I would like him to stay here," Pickett said. "We love him. Great teammate, one of the best teammates you ever been around. 'A-Rod' is our quarterback now. We believe in him and we believe in Brett. I think he'd make us better."Originally posted by Pacopete4link it Partial.. cant find it
"If it so happens that Brett's here and he ends up being the best for our team, I'm sure he'll play," linebacker Nick Barnett said. "If not, then Aaron Rodgers will play."
Read between the lines.
Comment
-
“Him being around, that’s the biggest thing,” Driver said. “We have so much fun with him around. It’s a good thing he’s back and coming back here. You have a different love for him than anybody else.
“My love for him is different than any other guy in the locker room. I’m glad he signed the papers and decided to come back for another year.”
"he said he was looking forward to the moment Favre walked through the locker room door."
- Donald Driver
Comment
-
Re: Vets want Favre back
Can't you just imagine the leading question being as to these guys by some shit-for-brains media asshole? IF he is better ....... did the dipshit reporter think to ask whether they think he will be better--or more precisely, whether the team would be better with Favre starting?Originally posted by PartialBarnett and Pickett have gone on record saying they want Favre to be the quarterback if he is better.
Way to F this one up Sidewinder. If those guys feel that way, its likely imo that Chuck, Al, Donald, Mark, Chad, Aaron feel that way as well, aka the players that make will make the Packers good this year.
Bojive.
Obviously, Thompson, McCarthy, Murphy, and probably a bunch of the players think the team would NOT be better off with Favre starting. WHY do some of you in this forum feel the need to disagree?What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Re: Vets want Favre back
Originally posted by texaspackerbackerCan't you just imagine the leading question being as to these guys by some shit-for-brains media asshole? IF he is better ....... did the dipshit reporter think to ask whether they think he will be better--or more precisely, whether the team would be better with Favre starting?Originally posted by PartialBarnett and Pickett have gone on record saying they want Favre to be the quarterback if he is better.
Way to F this one up Sidewinder. If those guys feel that way, its likely imo that Chuck, Al, Donald, Mark, Chad, Aaron feel that way as well, aka the players that make will make the Packers good this year.
Bojive.
Obviously, Thompson, McCarthy, Murphy, and probably a bunch of the players think the team would NOT be better off with Favre starting. WHY do some of you in this forum feel the need to disagree?
I've never heard MM nor Murphy say anything about the team being better without Favre... as a matter of fact I never heard TT said it either... he even dodged the question in his press conference about who gives them a better chance to win...
Comment
-
Originally posted by packers11“Him being around, that’s the biggest thing,” Driver said. “We have so much fun with him around. It’s a good thing he’s back and coming back here. You have a different love for him than anybody else.
“My love for him is different than any other guy in the locker room. I’m glad he signed the papers and decided to come back for another year.”
"he said he was looking forward to the moment Favre walked through the locker room door."
- Donald Driver
its been all over nfl network......DUHThey said God has a Tim Tebow complex!
Brew Crew in 2011!!!
Comment
-
He's screwing around with the media. Jesus Christ, P, become a politician or something. You're great at taking words completely out of context.Originally posted by Partial"We Want Brett" - Chuck Woodson"I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley
Comment
-
He still said it. I'm sure there is truth behind it. You act as if he didn't do it intentionally, full well knowing he probably got scoulded by MM for disrespecting for tarnishing the golden boys confidence.Originally posted by BallHawkHe's screwing around with the media. Jesus Christ, P, become a politician or something. You're great at taking words completely out of context.Originally posted by Partial"We Want Brett" - Chuck Woodson
Comment
-
Any NFL quarterback would of had good statistics for GB last year, even Rex Grossman. He got his records and he got to $hit the bed one last time so he has nothing to prove to me. I already knew he was a choker 13 years ago. Do we really need to watch him $hit the bed again to see the obvious?
Hey, maybe Rodgers is not a bedshitter, maybe he will be so brittle he won't get the chance to choke but I would sure like to see GB build into a dynasty around a young QB. That seems to make a heck of a lot sense to me.
Originally posted by MadtownPackerI agree but 8 months ago is not really much in the past.Originally posted by The GunshooterOnly idiots live in the past.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The GunshooterAny NFL quarterback would of had good statistics for GB last year, even Rex Grossman. He got his records and he got to $hit the bed one last time so he has nothing to prove to me. I already knew he was a choker 13 years ago. Do we really need to watch him $hit the bed again to see the obvious?
Hey, maybe Rodgers is not a bedshitter, maybe he will be so brittle he won't get the chance to choke but I would sure like to see GB build into a dynasty around a young QB. That seems to make a heck of a lot sense to me.
Originally posted by MadtownPackerI agree but 8 months ago is not really much in the past.Originally posted by The GunshooterOnly idiots live in the past.
Wasn't he winning a Super Bowl about 13 years ago
Last year he showed what he could do with good WR options
As far as Rex Grossman or any QB being able to put up good stats...hard to even comment on that. GB was 13-3 and IMO any QB would not have been able to bring out those results. Even the majority of anti Favre members would agree with that.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Bretsky.. they will see how good Favre was this season if he is not under center..
please do not type back I'm bashing Rodgers, paaalease.. he just is not going to be as good IMO and we will struggle at times this season and in the future
Comment
-
How can you say that?!? It has yet to be seen if the offense is nearly as productive without Favre. Furthermore, Favre did it without a running game for half the season and still played quite well. Teams were dropping 6 guys!!Originally posted by The GunshooterAny NFL quarterback would of had good statistics for GB last year, even Rex Grossman. He got his records and he got to $hit the bed one last time so he has nothing to prove to me. I already knew he was a choker 13 years ago. Do we really need to watch him $hit the bed again to see the obvious?
Hey, maybe Rodgers is not a bedshitter, maybe he will be so brittle he won't get the chance to choke but I would sure like to see GB build into a dynasty around a young QB. That seems to make a heck of a lot sense to me.
Originally posted by MadtownPackerI agree but 8 months ago is not really much in the past.Originally posted by The GunshooterOnly idiots live in the past.
Comment

Comment