Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brett's Text Message to ESPN

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    No doubt, Sheeps. Probably has lots of "LOL's" and "WFTF's" in it.

    The more this goes on and the more that is revealed, the more I think this isn't so much about Favre wanting to play as it is about Favre's ego. Check out this Bus Cook quote:

    "If he was given his release, there's no guarantee he'd go anywhere to play," Cook said. "However, he'd have the freedom to choose if he should decide to play."

    Okay, it's frickin' August 1st, and he still doesn't know if he wants to play??
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Fritz
      No doubt, Sheeps. Probably has lots of "LOL's" and "WFTF's" in it.

      The more this goes on and the more that is revealed, the more I think this isn't so much about Favre wanting to play as it is about Favre's ego. Check out this Bus Cook quote:

      "If he was given his release, there's no guarantee he'd go anywhere to play," Cook said. "However, he'd have the freedom to choose if he should decide to play."

      Okay, it's frickin' August 1st, and he still doesn't know if he wants to play??
      That would appear to be a direct result of the unexpected lack of interest around the NFL I suspect.
      Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

      Comment


      • #18
        A sampling

        Favre "wut up e-wern lulz"

        Werner "what?"

        Favre "ttly h8in on TT atm"

        Werner "what?"

        Favre "MN FTW!"

        Werner "what?"
        Originally posted by 3irty1
        This is museum quality stupidity.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by sheepshead
          By the way, who else thinks Brittney sent it under dads direction?


          LOL
          They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

          Brew Crew in 2011!!!

          Comment


          • #20
            They did the same thing With Dan Marino so why not Favre?
            Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Brett's Text Message to ESPN

              Originally posted by Gunakor
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              ESPNews just showed a text message from Brett to ESPN's Ed Werder.

              He said he is contemplating taking the offer from the Packers (which ESPN is now reporting could be closer to $25M to match his salary for the next 2 years). He said the solution seems awkward, but sort of went out of his way to give Mark Murphy credit for trying to offer up a solution. He said that his intentions were to play for the Packers, but they said no. He said he told them that then he wants to play for a team in the division "for obvious reasons". He told them that if you don't want me playing for you, then let me play against you.

              The message was interesting in that I think it's the first time he's went out of his way to almost praise somebody in the Packers organization, but also basically admitted that he wants to play for the Vikings (or Bears, but it seems likely it's the Vikings) if he can't play in Green Bay.

              I think it's apparent that he thought he could come back any time and the team would welcome him with open arms. That didn't happen, and he was upset (which is somewhat understandable, but I still don't know how he couldn't see this happening after he retired, unretired, and retired again). It made him upset enough to want to play for the Vikings so he could stick it to the Packers for not accepting him back.

              It's like I thought. It's not just about playing football. It's about proving a point.

              Someone's ego is indeed running wild, but it's not Ted Thompson's.
              Yep it sure seems that way now. Brett doesn't give a rats ass how Packer fans would feel with him playing in purple as long as he proves his point and gets a chance to stick it to the green and gold. Man he must really hate Thompson.
              www.ccso228@twitter.com

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Zool
                A sampling

                Favre "wut up e-wern lulz"

                Werner "what?"

                Favre "ttly h8in on TT atm"

                Werner "what?"

                Favre "MN FTW!"

                Werner "what?"


                Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by boiga
                  Weirdness.... The espn blog is directly contradicting the JSO analysis.

                  JSO is saying that this is a 2 million dollar a year deal for 10 years that Favre can accept whether he retires or not.

                  This is what ESPN is saying:
                  The Vikings won't get that chance, however, if Favre accepts an offer from the Packers to serve in a marketing role for the organization. According to ESPN's Wendi Nix, he would receive $12 million in 2008 and $13 million in 2009 under the agreement, which would prevent him from seeking future reinstatement to the NFL.
                  http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcnorth/...Minnesota.html


                  So ESPN is still calling this a bribe to keep brett retired, JSO says the deal was thought up BEFORE Brett ever retired.



                  The ESPN people are hacks, so I definitely would trust JSO's "NFL source who wanted the Packers' side to be explained" more... but wow. Someone is going to have to write a lengthy retraction tomorrow.
                  Im not one to defend ESPN but in this case Ill make an exception. In no way do I think ESPN is reporting this as a bribe. That is all in preception. THey are reporting an offer. All they are not reporting is when it was initally offered. BUt in no way is ESPN reporting this as a bribe.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Listen to PFT (though I am considering more of their "journalism" skills dubious) and they out right say it is a bribe.

                    At this point, I'm thinking its the best case scenario for the Packers absent a trade to an AFC team. I am not thrilled because of what it can be perceived as. But considering it's there regardless if Favre plays or not this year makes it more palatable.
                    -digital dean

                    No "TROLLS" allowed!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by cpk1994
                      Originally posted by boiga
                      Weirdness.... The espn blog is directly contradicting the JSO analysis.

                      JSO is saying that this is a 2 million dollar a year deal for 10 years that Favre can accept whether he retires or not.

                      This is what ESPN is saying:
                      The Vikings won't get that chance, however, if Favre accepts an offer from the Packers to serve in a marketing role for the organization. According to ESPN's Wendi Nix, he would receive $12 million in 2008 and $13 million in 2009 under the agreement, which would prevent him from seeking future reinstatement to the NFL.
                      http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcnorth/...Minnesota.html


                      So ESPN is still calling this a bribe to keep brett retired, JSO says the deal was thought up BEFORE Brett ever retired.



                      The ESPN people are hacks, so I definitely would trust JSO's "NFL source who wanted the Packers' side to be explained" more... but wow. Someone is going to have to write a lengthy retraction tomorrow.
                      Im not one to defend ESPN but in this case Ill make an exception. In no way do I think ESPN is reporting this as a bribe. That is all in preception. THey are reporting an offer. All they are not reporting is when it was initally offered. BUt in no way is ESPN reporting this as a bribe.
                      But can he go to another team or not? JSO is saying yes, ESPN is saying no.....

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by digitaldean
                        Listen to PFT (though I am considering more of their "journalism" skills dubious) and they out right say it is a bribe.

                        At this point, I'm thinking its the best case scenario for the Packers absent a trade to an AFC team. I am not thrilled because of what it can be perceived as. But considering it's there regardless if Favre plays or not this year makes it more palatable.
                        PFT are shit stirrers trying to get hits to their podunk website. They mean nothing.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Chevelle2
                          But can he go to another team or not? JSO is saying yes, ESPN is saying no.....
                          Yes, that's the vital difference here. If JSO is right, then this is a noble offer to help mend the bridges no matter what Brett's choice is about retirement.

                          If ESPN and Florio are right, the Packers are acting like right douchebags by paying Brett off to retire and then lying about it to JSO.

                          I like option 1. a lot more, but right now it's ESPN's source vs JSO's source, so we really can't analyze their credibility. Hopefully the Packers will openly clear this up some time today.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Both sources, ESPN and JSO, have been wrong before.

                            Just gotta keep on waiting.

                            If Favre isn't reinstated today I'll be peeved. Goodell can't keep on putting it off.
                            "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by BallHawk
                              Both sources, ESPN and JSO, have been wrong before.

                              Just gotta keep on waiting.

                              If Favre isn't reinstated today I'll be peeved. Goodell can't keep on putting it off.
                              SUre he can, He's the commsih, he can do what he wants. I wouldn't be suprised if he held off unti Monday(for obvious reasons).

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Brett's Text Message to ESPN

                                I didn't buy Favre's biography a few years ago and I'm glad. The revised edition is going to have a few extra chapters in it about what I'm guessing is a form of male menopause. His recent bizarre behavior is so contradictory to the image that he chiseled for himself for 17 years.

                                I never would have imagined that his career would have taken the turn it has. I hate to say it but the shine of being "the most respected player in football" is really coming off fast, IMHO.[/quote]

                                Well stated, Kiwon. I share your reflections.

                                This is what M3 referred to as Favre "tarnishing his legacy."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X