Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Teammates 'moving forward' with Favre

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by cpk1994
    Originally posted by Pacopete4
    Originally posted by cpk1994
    Originally posted by Pacopete4
    We didnt draft Brohm for no reason.... or Flynn for that matter
    Its gonna take at least 3-4 years before you realisitcly get anything out of them so yes, they have set the team back that many years, all becuase of Favre's fucking ego.
    Why does it have to take 3-4 years for them to be good? I didnt know there was a book on this.. if thats the case Ben Rothlesberger didn't write it
    And Brohm is nowhere near Rothlesberger.


    You're right.. Brohm looked a ton better in college... so whats your point?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by cpk1994
      Originally posted by Pacopete4
      Originally posted by cpk1994
      Originally posted by Pacopete4
      We didnt draft Brohm for no reason.... or Flynn for that matter
      Its gonna take at least 3-4 years before you realisitcly get anything out of them so yes, they have set the team back that many years, all becuase of Favre's fucking ego.
      Why does it have to take 3-4 years for them to be good? I didnt know there was a book on this.. if thats the case Ben Rothlesberger didn't write it
      And Brohm is nowhere near Rothlesberger.

      Nobody thought Rothlisberger was anywhere near Rothlisberger before Rothlisberger became the starter either. Same for Brady before Brady was a starter (6th round pick) or Romo before Romo was a starter (undrafted). You can't be 100% certain of anything in this league.
      Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Pacopete4
        Originally posted by cpk1994
        Originally posted by Pacopete4
        Originally posted by cpk1994
        Originally posted by Pacopete4
        We didnt draft Brohm for no reason.... or Flynn for that matter
        Its gonna take at least 3-4 years before you realisitcly get anything out of them so yes, they have set the team back that many years, all becuase of Favre's fucking ego.
        Why does it have to take 3-4 years for them to be good? I didnt know there was a book on this.. if thats the case Ben Rothlesberger didn't write it
        And Brohm is nowhere near Rothlesberger.


        You're right.. Brohm looked a ton better in college... so whats your point?
        My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by cpk1994
          Originally posted by Pacopete4
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          Originally posted by Pacopete4
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          Originally posted by Pacopete4
          We didnt draft Brohm for no reason.... or Flynn for that matter
          Its gonna take at least 3-4 years before you realisitcly get anything out of them so yes, they have set the team back that many years, all becuase of Favre's fucking ego.
          Why does it have to take 3-4 years for them to be good? I didnt know there was a book on this.. if thats the case Ben Rothlesberger didn't write it
          And Brohm is nowhere near Rothlesberger.


          You're right.. Brohm looked a ton better in college... so whats your point?
          My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?
          Noted. You can keep your opinion to yourself now.
          Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

          Comment


          • Originally posted by cpk1994
            My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?

            How do you know?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by cpk1994
              My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?
              Shouldn't you be buying a lottery ticket somewhere?
              Originally posted by 3irty1
              This is museum quality stupidity.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Pacopete4
                Originally posted by cpk1994
                My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?

                How do you know?
                Based on the play Ive seen from him. Not impressed in the lesat.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by cpk1994
                  My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?
                  But aren't you the one lambasting armchair GMs?

                  My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by cpk1994
                    Originally posted by Pacopete4
                    Originally posted by cpk1994
                    My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?

                    How do you know?
                    Based on the play Ive seen from him. Not impressed in the lesat.

                    Play you've seen from him? hahahahahha

                    Comment


                    • If thats the case you should be happy Rodgers might not be our QB.. cuz he's looked like pure shit in more opportunities to play and if that good game in Dallas didnt happen last year NO ONE would think he's any good...

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by The Leaper
                        Originally posted by cpk1994
                        My point is I think Brhom is crap. Clear enough for you?
                        But aren't you the one lambasting armchair GMs?

                        NO Im lambasting the real GM.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Pacopete4
                          If thats the case you should be happy Rodgers might not be our QB.. cuz he's looked like pure shit in more opportunities to play and if that good game in Dallas didnt happen last year NO ONE would think he's any good...
                          None of this is true. He's had 2 games in which he actually played. One he broke his foot and looked bad against the team with the best record in the AFC. One he led a good comeback against the team with the best record in the NFC.

                          Plenty of people thought he was good before that. When does your offer come in to GM a pro football team?
                          Originally posted by 3irty1
                          This is museum quality stupidity.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Pacopete4
                            If thats the case you should be happy Rodgers might not be our QB.. cuz he's looked like pure shit in more opportunities to play and if that good game in Dallas didnt happen last year NO ONE would think he's any good...
                            He looked pretty good in preseason last year too. Better than Favre anyway. Can't forget that.
                            Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by cpk1994
                              Originally posted by Gunakor
                              Originally posted by cpk1994
                              Originally posted by Patler
                              Originally posted by cpk1994
                              Originally posted by Ballboy
                              Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

                              He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



                              Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?
                              Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?
                              Every pro athlete knows that the only thing separating them from the second team or the waiver wire is their performance. Not commitments from the coach, general manger or anyone. Their performance.
                              YOu might have merit if Rodgers was actually being given a shot to keep the job he was given.
                              Open competition means Rodgers DOES have a shot to keep the job. Just as Favre shouldn't be just handed the job, neither should Rodgers. It can't be forgotten that Rodgers has never had to compete for his job either...
                              Favre shouldn't get the job at all as he RETIRED. If they want an open competition, it should be between Rodgers Brohm and Flynn ONLY, the guys who have been committed from the start and have put in all the work.

                              He's an active player.....sorry....

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Rastak
                                Originally posted by cpk1994
                                Originally posted by Gunakor
                                Originally posted by cpk1994
                                Originally posted by Patler
                                Originally posted by cpk1994
                                Originally posted by Ballboy
                                Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

                                He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



                                Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?
                                Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?
                                Every pro athlete knows that the only thing separating them from the second team or the waiver wire is their performance. Not commitments from the coach, general manger or anyone. Their performance.
                                YOu might have merit if Rodgers was actually being given a shot to keep the job he was given.
                                Open competition means Rodgers DOES have a shot to keep the job. Just as Favre shouldn't be just handed the job, neither should Rodgers. It can't be forgotten that Rodgers has never had to compete for his job either...
                                Favre shouldn't get the job at all as he RETIRED. If they want an open competition, it should be between Rodgers Brohm and Flynn ONLY, the guys who have been committed from the start and have put in all the work.

                                He's an active player.....sorry....
                                You know what I mean.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X