Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FAVRE PLACED ON ROSTER
Collapse
X
-
Re: FAVRE PLACED ON ROSTER
Originally posted by Pacopete4http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2008/08/04/3/
boy does it feel good again to see that #4 on the roster
Yeah it does. But he's yet to win anything yet. #4 could still be #2.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
-
Rodgers should still be #1, simply because Favre retired and Rodgers put in all the OTA and off-season work with the #1 unit. If Favre never retires he never loses his spot atop the depth chart.Originally posted by Pacopete4they haven't updated the depth chart yet.. was interested to see how that goes or even if they will
Comment
-
HAAAA...yup something like thatOriginally posted by ZoolYou mean like "use the word Condrew in a sentence"?Originally posted by sheepsheadCondrew Allen has become an answer to a trivia question...Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
Comment
-
Originally posted by SparkeyRodgers should still be #1, simply because Favre retired and Rodgers put in all the OTA and off-season work with the #1 unit. If Favre never retires he never loses his spot atop the depth chart.Originally posted by Pacopete4they haven't updated the depth chart yet.. was interested to see how that goes or even if they will
As quoted from another article:
"Rodgers, by virtue of Favre's retirement announcement in March, had earned the opportunity to start. But Favre, by virtue of his reinstatement and a career's body of work, had earned the right to at least compete for his old job. Being the NFL's all-time leader in completions, attempts, yards, victories and quarterback durability should count for something, right? "
Comment
-
That quote fits this situation pretty well I thinkOriginally posted by packinpatlandOriginally posted by SparkeyRodgers should still be #1, simply because Favre retired and Rodgers put in all the OTA and off-season work with the #1 unit. If Favre never retires he never loses his spot atop the depth chart.Originally posted by Pacopete4they haven't updated the depth chart yet.. was interested to see how that goes or even if they will
As quoted from another article:
"Rodgers, by virtue of Favre's retirement announcement in March, had earned the opportunity to start. But Favre, by virtue of his reinstatement and a career's body of work, had earned the right to at least compete for his old job. Being the NFL's all-time leader in completions, attempts, yards, victories and quarterback durability should count for something, right? "
Comment
-
If only it were really that simple.Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez"My Brett Favre's back and the NFC's in trouble
Hey Minn, Hey Minn,
My Brett Favre's back!"
But it's not."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
you forgot interceptions and home playoff losses by a packer.Originally posted by packinpatlandOriginally posted by SparkeyRodgers should still be #1, simply because Favre retired and Rodgers put in all the OTA and off-season work with the #1 unit. If Favre never retires he never loses his spot atop the depth chart.Originally posted by Pacopete4they haven't updated the depth chart yet.. was interested to see how that goes or even if they will
As quoted from another article:
"Rodgers, by virtue of Favre's retirement announcement in March, had earned the opportunity to start. But Favre, by virtue of his reinstatement and a career's body of work, had earned the right to at least compete for his old job. Being the NFL's all-time leader in completions, attempts, yards, victories and quarterback durability should count for something, right? "The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment


Comment