Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Favre saga update
Collapse
X
-
I tend to agree. I'm not happy that Favre will likely be playing elsewhere. However, I'm more mad at Favre than anyone because I think he is the one who is primarily responsible for it. He doesn't like Thompson. That's fine. Some players don't like the GM, but he should have looked at the big picture in all of this. Thompson is doing a fine job overall. He let it get personal, and I think his ego didn't allow him to take the right approach. His Greta interview was the worst. The Campen comment turned me off, but the answer ("Why?") to Greta's question about whether he'd be willing to compete for the starting job was probably the end of my sympathy for him.Originally posted by NoodleI'm not sure, Merlin. I've written this before, so I apologize for the repeat, but here's how I see it. I think Favre is better now and would win a "real" QB competition. I think he'd be better up through game 10 or 11.
But I think there's a good chance A-Rod, if there's no Favre on the sideline and A-Rod is thus the undisputed starter from day one, turns out to be a more capable game winner by the end of the season than Favre.
I didn't say better QB, I said more capable game winner. Especially when it starts getting cold.
A-Rod's going to need some time, but I trust M3's instincts that they guy can be something."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
I tend to agree with this. The Vikings Defense is the newest example of if ESPN says it's so a couple hundred times, then it must be so.Originally posted by packers11what the hell are you smoking??? THEY HAVE THE MOST OVERRATED D in the league...Originally posted by Pacopete4Originally posted by The LeaperWhat? The Packer defense is chopped liver?Originally posted by Pacopete4Great point.. the thing that Jackson may have over Rodgers is that defense the Vikes have.. they are gonna be tough
Their defense is a lot better than ours IMO
Not saying they suck ass. They just haven't proven all that much to be garnering this much respect."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
Baseball is a win now league. Football, as long as there is parity in the form of revenue sharing and a salary cap, is a win CONSISTENTLY league. You don't risk losing your future QB in favor of your past QB. Besides, as young as the Packers are, we have plenty of time. The departure of Favre does not signal the beginning of the end, and neither will the departure of Driver or Harris or Clifton or Taucher. It will mark the end of the transition. This is the beginning of a new era here, something that was going to come eventually.Originally posted by bbbffl66That is the whole issue! This is a win now league. As close as the Packers are, can we afford "some time"?Originally posted by NoodleI'm not sure, Merlin. I've written this before, so I apologize for the repeat, but here's how I see it. I think Favre is better now and would win a "real" QB competition. I think he'd be better up through game 10 or 11.
But I think there's a good chance A-Rod, if there's no Favre on the sideline and A-Rod is thus the undisputed starter from day one, turns out to be a more capable game winner by the end of the season than Favre.
I didn't say better QB, I said more capable game winner. Especially when it starts getting cold.
A-Rod's going to need some time, but I trust M3's instincts that they guy can be something.
Let me ask you this bbbffl66, were you okay with Rodgers as the starter back in March - post retirement presser but before any whispers of his return? Did you think we were going to be okay, or do we suck worse now simply because Favre wanted to come back? Aaron Rodgers is Aaron Rodgers, just like he was back in March. I was fine with him then, and I'm fine with him now. How bout you?Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
This is a good point, Gunakor. Back when Favre retired, people didn't treat Rodgers like crap. They were, at least, hopeful.
Now he sucks? Man, he got really bad in four months. And not a game was played. And he went to all the OTA's and worked out, too."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
I was fine with him.. but I always hoped Brett came back... thats never gonna change... how could anyone not want him back is the insane part?... yes, we've moved on, blaw blaw.... not a meaningful snap has happened nor near happening
Comment
-
Lets start a roll call for who should play Brett. Im going with the guy who played Urkel....or maybe Partial.Originally posted by CaliforniaCheezI can't what for the movie or the docudrama to be made.
It could be a television classic rpic like Shogun or Roots.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
I totally agreeOriginally posted by FritzThis is a good point, Gunakor. Back when Favre retired, people didn't treat Rodgers like crap. They were, at least, hopeful.
Now he sucks? Man, he got really bad in four months. And not a game was played. And he went to all the OTA's and worked out, too.What do you mean, my birth certificate expired?
Comment
-
I'll second thatOriginally posted by javqaI totally agreeOriginally posted by FritzThis is a good point, Gunakor. Back when Favre retired, people didn't treat Rodgers like crap. They were, at least, hopeful.
Now he sucks? Man, he got really bad in four months. And not a game was played. And he went to all the OTA's and worked out, too.
Comment



Comment