More wins in 2008?

[RashanGary]

My vote is going for the Packers.

[BallHawk]

It won't even be close. Packers will be a good 3 games better than the Jets.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

It won't even be close. Packers will be a good 3 games better than the Jets.

That is a bit optimistic.

Jets could easily win 9 or 10 games.

[RashanGary]

The Jets brought in a hell of a good offensive lineman and DeBrickshaw should be a rock out at LT.

I think they could be OK, but I could see Brett really struggling having only 4 weeks to get ready for the season in a completely different offense than what he's used to.

For some reason I see NE and SD absolutely tearing him apart in weeks 2 and 3. Him not being in the best shape of his career, being overwealmed with a new offense and his age, I acctually worry for him a little.

[Freak Out]

Ha ha....

[Gunakor]

Too close to call. I think both teams are 10 win teams this year. I voted Packers simply because I'm a Packers fan, but in all honesty I think it will be very close.

[BallHawk]

Packers= 11 win team

Jets= 8 win team

[RashanGary]

Packers= 11 win team

Jets= 8 win team

I'm thinking close to this. I want to see Rodgers in the preseason and in the first couple games, but my initial thought is optimism.

[Brando19]

I saw this exact question on ESPN with the cast of 4 (such as Emmitt Smith and Keyshawn) and they all said the Jets will have more wins than the Packers but only Emmitt said the Jets will beat the Patriots at least once.

[Bretsky]

Unless Aaron Rodgers is a complete piece of shit GB should have more wins.

Simply put the talent is just much better.

Jets have the better OL; QB aside I'm not sure I'd annoint any other position besides OL on the Jets as being better than Green Bay's.

[Chevelle2]

I saw this exact question on ESPN with the cast of 4 (such as Emmitt Smith and Keyshawn) and they all said the Jets will have more wins than the Packers but only Emmitt said the Jets will beat the Patriots at least once.

[RashanGary]

Unless Aaron Rodgers is a complete piece of shit GB should have more wins.

Simply put the talent is just much better.

Jets have the better OL; QB aside I'm not sure I'd annoint any other position besides OL on the Jets as being better than Green Bay's.

Acctually, other than Brett Favre the Packers were a 4-12 team. The Jets just got Favre and added a top tier FA when we added nobody. Shouldn't it be a no brainer to anyone who understands Favre carried this team that the Jets will blow us away?

[Bretsky]

Unless Aaron Rodgers is a complete piece of shit GB should have more wins.

Simply put the talent is just much better.

Jets have the better OL; QB aside I'm not sure I'd annoint any other position besides OL on the Jets as being better than Green Bay's.

Acctually, other than Brett Favre the Packers were a 4-12 team. The Jets just got Favre and added a top tier FA when we added nobody. Shouldn't it be a no brainer to anyone who understands Favre carried this team that the Jets will blow us away?

Did you just ignore the position comparisons between GB and the Jets I made above to formulate your blanket sarcastic generalization or am I missing something ?

[RIPackerFan]

I'm sorry - but if the Pack doesn't do better than the Jets - then I will be pissed off.

While Favre is a great QB - there is a lot of talent on this team - and for them not to be better than .500 (which is where I think the Jets will be) - I will seriously question MM and TT and start to wonder if more of their success wasn't because of Favre.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Unless Aaron Rodgers is a complete piece of shit GB should have more wins.

Simply put the talent is just much better.

Jets have the better OL; QB aside I'm not sure I'd annoint any other position besides OL on the Jets as being better than Green Bay's.

I'd say Jones is a better back than grant. Proven ability..but, not by much..or at least equal. There RB positon is better than ours.

Better at FB.

They are better at TE as well.