Predict Rodgers Stats...

[mmmdk]

Passing: 24 TDs, 12ints, 3400 yards and 62% comp.

Rushing: 220 yards, 2TDs and 12 fumbles/7 lost.

That's in 16 games.

[Pacopete4]

Re: Predict Rodgers Stats...

Im bored....Ill bump it too.....

250/400
26 touchdowns
14 interceptions
3200 yards

200 rush yards
2 rush touchdowns


94.58 rating.

AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... YOU GOTTA BE SHITTIN ME... WATCH OUT FAVRE CUZ YOUR RECORDS ARE ABOUT TO FALL.............. AAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHA

[3irty1]

2800 yards
18 TD
10 INT

He's going to win games but I doubt he's going to dazzle.

[The Gunshooter]

12-4, same stats as Favre last year with 300 yards rushing and a pro bowl berth.

[Lurker64]

441/621
5,233 yards passing
52 Touchdowns
4 Interceptions

16-0 Baby!

[prsnfoto]

24-48
220 yds
2 TDs
4 INTs

[Freak Out]

441/621
5,233 yards passing
52 Touchdowns
4 Interceptions

16-0 Baby!

Don't bogard that kool-aid my friend...pass it over to me.

I would be happy with that kind of performance out of Rodgers.

[MadScientist]

176 / 321
2023 yards passing
7 TD
8 INT

141 Yds russing


Instead of pulling numbers out of my ass, I pulled them out of Hasselbeck's first year in Seattle. (The numbers were for 12 games, which is plausible for AR). Hasselbeck didn't turn into a good QB until his 3rd year.

I chose Hasslebeck as he was the last Favre understudy to go on to be a starter. The other stat line to look at would be Brett's first year in GB:

302/471 3227yds 18 TD, 13 INT (13 games)

I'd say most hear are predicting a higher TD/INT ratio that should be reasonably expected.

[Chevelle2]

Thought Id bump this to allow more people to get their predictions in.

[The Leaper]

My guess?

14 games played
59% comp
3000 yards
20 TD
14 INT

[Gunakor]

From the looks of things, we might be leading the NFL in drops come January. So it's kinda hard to predict. Add on to that the ineffectiveness of our offensive line and the slower than hoped for recovery of Ryan Grant and I think Rodgers is going to struggle some, especially early on. However the second half of our schedule is alot easier than the first, so I think we are poised to go on a tear in the final 8 games if we are healthy.


2800-3100 yards, 25-30 TD throws, 15-20 INT's, 55-60% completion percentage, 25-35 sacks (most of them coming early in the season).

[Merlin]

I would say using Hasselbeck's numbers is fair. Although I don't think Rodgers will play all 16 games, especially if our line keeps blocking so well

[cheesner]

176 / 321
2023 yards passing
7 TD
8 INT

141 Yds russing


Instead of pulling numbers out of my ass, I pulled them out of Hasselbeck's first year in Seattle. (The numbers were for 12 games, which is plausible for AR). Hasselbeck didn't turn into a good QB until his 3rd year.

I chose Hasslebeck as he was the last Favre understudy to go on to be a starter. The other stat line to look at would be Brett's first year in GB:

302/471 3227yds 18 TD, 13 INT (13 games)

I'd say most hear are predicting a higher TD/INT ratio that should be reasonably expected.

The difference is that AR was much further along than MH coming out of college. I expect AR to be further along and more successful. AR also has more talent and more talent around him.

I am going with 325/500 3600 yds 28 TDS 17 INTS

[Zool]

Assuming he plays 14 games, I'll go with

2800yards 17td/14int

[mmmdk]

Passing: 24 TDs, 12ints, 3400 yards and 62% comp.

Rushing: 220 yards, 2TDs and 12 fumbles/7 lost.

That's in 16 games.

I'll stick with the above barring injury and what not. This is due to the strenght of the Packers; namely our WR corps. Plus our D is will give up more points in my book; more catching other teams from behind in games.

Packers of 2008 will resemble Packers of 2006 in wins but play better. 2007 will be hard to copy; this is the NFL, new season and Packers are not a powerhouse (yet). A 9-7 record is good in 2008.