Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Donald Driver: Hall Of Famer?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
    Originally posted by mraynrand
    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
    Originally posted by mraynrand
    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
    DD in the HOF...c'mon you homers. This isn't even realistic.
    Hmmm.... 2 for (possibly) and 8 against. Yeah, c'mon all two of you homers, this isn't realistic.
    Actually, it was 3..but, is the # important?

    Plenty of people view but dont' post.

    Pwned!!!
    Ha ha. Now you presume to know what the viewer/nonposters think. Isuppose now you'll give us an exposition on statistics and sampling errors and one tailed t tests or ANOVA, etc. and how the 'nonposters' can't be estimated from the posters because they are a different group.... yet the 15th wonder knows all. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
    NO, i don't presume..i'm preaching to them. If any of them are thinking he deserves the hall i'm telling them no way.

    Pwned...again.
    Hail Messiah!
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by mraynrand
      Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
      Originally posted by mraynrand
      Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
      Originally posted by mraynrand
      Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
      DD in the HOF...c'mon you homers. This isn't even realistic.
      Hmmm.... 2 for (possibly) and 8 against. Yeah, c'mon all two of you homers, this isn't realistic.
      Actually, it was 3..but, is the # important?

      Plenty of people view but dont' post.

      Pwned!!!
      Ha ha. Now you presume to know what the viewer/nonposters think. Isuppose now you'll give us an exposition on statistics and sampling errors and one tailed t tests or ANOVA, etc. and how the 'nonposters' can't be estimated from the posters because they are a different group.... yet the 15th wonder knows all. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
      NO, i don't presume..i'm preaching to them. If any of them are thinking he deserves the hall i'm telling them no way.

      Pwned...again.
      Hail Messiah!
      So, at least you acknowledge that JC wasn't it.

      Pwned.

      Comment


      • #33
        it?
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by mission
          Originally posted by DonHutson
          I don't think he's more talented than guys like Robert Brooks or Antonio Freeman.
          I disagree with this completely.

          Talent is a hard term to quantify, so I won't try with statistics, but some of the things we've all see DD do are far beyond the *real* benefactors of Brett Favre that you listed imo ...

          Antonio Freeman? I've always hated that clown... even after his goofy catch and run on Monday night. Freeman was *so* overrated.

          Robert Brooks? You might be able to make a solid argument ... but Favre in his prime is a big side for me.
          Agree with this 100%. Driver is a better receiver than Freeman, IMHO. He's had a better career than Brooks--although Robert was pretty damn good before the injuries started hitting him.
          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
            Originally posted by mission
            Originally posted by DonHutson
            I don't think he's more talented than guys like Robert Brooks or Antonio Freeman.
            I disagree with this completely.

            Talent is a hard term to quantify, so I won't try with statistics, but some of the things we've all see DD do are far beyond the *real* benefactors of Brett Favre that you listed imo ...

            Antonio Freeman? I've always hated that clown... even after his goofy catch and run on Monday night. Freeman was *so* overrated.

            Robert Brooks? You might be able to make a solid argument ... but Favre in his prime is a big side for me.
            Agree with this 100%. Driver is a better receiver than Freeman, IMHO. He's had a better career than Brooks--although Robert was pretty damn good before the injuries started hitting him.

            Brooks IMO at his best was a strep up from Driver at his best. Same kind of player....hard workers...Brooks just a bit better.

            But he never got it back once he tore the knee apart
            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

            Comment


            • #36
              In their prime, I'd take Driver over Brooks. Like you said, they are similar players. However, I think Driver's YAC gives him the edge. Drive is sweet with the ball in his hands.
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #37
                The only way Driver has a shot at the HOF is if he puts up similar numbers for the next 5-6 years. Even then, his chances are iffy at best. He has never been considered an elite receiver during the time period which he has played, and has not yet won a Super Bowl. Career stats, perception, and championships seem to determine one's chances for the HOF.
                "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

                Comment


                • #38
                  he is going to be up against guys from the past and guys like Harrison, Owens, Moss.. guys like that... its going to be tough for him because I don't think he plays in the right place to get noticed nor plays in an offense that puts a WR in the spotlight due to the ball being spread around so much, especially in the red zone

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    In their prime, I'd take Driver over Brooks. Like you said, they are similar players. However, I think Driver's YAC gives him the edge. Drive is sweet with the ball in his hands.

                    I like Driver more than Brooks; I'd say Driver is hands down my favorite player
                    now.

                    But I think Brooks ran better routes and was able to get open more consistently. Had the impression he was able to get open in the red zone more. That might be unfounded. He just seemed more smooth.
                    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I think Driver is funnier... I know that doesn't count for a lot but the guy has a hilarious sense of humor ha

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        they both had absolutely insane workout regiments

                        Brooks was thought to have the only one that rivaled Jerry Rice

                        I remember Freeman interviewed after visiting Brooks and going through his workout. Said he'd never do it again and was in incredible pain for days.
                        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X