Kinda scary right now.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do we need a veteran back-up at quarterback?
Collapse
X
-
I say give the rooks a chance. Playing lousy in their first preseason game doesn't mean they can't hold a clipboard. They haven't shown any potential to win a game for us, but they should be able to hand off to Grant and not lose it for us either.
Also, I don't see anyone in the FA market that would have any better potential for us if Rodgers goes down.
Comment
-
Not to mention that Culpepper tuned down an offer before. What makes anyone think that he will change his mind now?Originally posted by Pacopete4Originally posted by MOBB DEEPGET CULPEPPER.......!!!!!
You can't be serious... anyone who thinks Culps is a west coast QB that has to actually read a defense is completely insane to me...
Comment
-
Kids gotta learn. Unless they fall completely flat, I say no.
If nothing improves much from the 1st exhibition, then prior to week one I can see it. But limiting throws in camp should be a last concession. I could be persuaded to change my mind if its probable that Flynn could be stashed on the practice squad safely for the year. Or if he's a good enough actor to develop a debilitating season ending hamstring problem, then go on IR and then miraculously recover in two weeks.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
yalready know how i voted!
please lord!
even if we only lose rodgers for 3 quarters of a game, we have to be able to have someone who can come in and just "not fuck it up" for three quarters if anything.
giving up a game just from a lack of preparation/realization, imo, is unacceptable and would be a major gripe of mine towards TT (yes, im capable of criticizing him)
i dont think we'll be afforded the luxury this year of being able to give away stupid games...
Originally posted by retailguy"no, we good"...
WTF? Did you let Tyrone write this poll?
.
Comment


Comment