USA Today article on Al Harris

[Partial]

We definatley live in different times. Isn't Woodsen's contract more than Harris'? Is that what started this? We may be coming to the day where long term contracts are writen in a way to keep the laters years more adjustable and keep people from pulling this stuff. Like in Harris' case it could have been written, If you are the number one corner at the begining of your third year of this contract, we will re-evaluate your salary and adjust it to a relative contract for that time or something along those lines. It sucks when no one has to honor a contract in the NFL anymore, but it seems to be the sign of the times. 1 year deals won't work but it seems 5 year deals are no longer working.

Woodson's contract should be more. In terms of salary, Woodson was the highest paid player in the league last year

[Harlan Huckleby]

Young players should sign, at most, 3-year contracts, because the market can change so much in 5 years, and young players performances are so unpredictable.

An old guy like Harris, well, he signed his final contract, a 5-year deal. At the time, everybody commented that it was too generous! His contract is now a little low compared to other top shelf corners. But I don't think it is low enough to force a rewrite. I don't blame Al Harris for wanting a new deal, but I doubt he has the leverage to get it.

[Merlin]

I think Harris is slighted by the contract that Woodson signed earning him almost 10 Mil the first year. Harris has been solid for us ever since we picked him up. He was over shadowed in Philly because they had a lot of depth at CB at the time. We have the money, I say pay him more through incentives. I believe most of a pro players salary should be incentive based. The better you do the more you earn.

[LaFours]

He said he isn't going to miss any of the mandatory stuff, he just wants management to know that he feels a bit overlooked now that Woodson is here making a lot more than him. I really don't have a problem with it because of the following reasons:
- His absense at the OTA's gives the likes of Hawkins and Carroll some much-needed reps with the #1 D
- He stands less of a chance on injuring himself not being here (although the Big Ben saga weakens this aspect of my argument...but I'm still gonna say it)
- He already knows the defense from last year and the modifications will be minor at best (per Sanders)
- The first four teams we face are Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, Philly, so the first month of the season the only WR's we will face that are of concern are Muhammed (Chicago), Stallworth (NO), Williams, (Det.) and ??? (Philly). The first real test for our secondary will be in Week 5 against St. Louis.

It's really not that big of a deal when you put it in perspective...but what else is there to talk about in the middle of June? So I'm all for the conversation.

[chain_gang]

I don't know what to think about the whole situation, but I can't wait to find out what happens when people start picking on Al's side of the field now that they have woodson. If he can prove it this year, which he'll have to in order to keep Carroll off of the field, then redo the contract, but I don't know that he is the shutdown corner everyone thinks he is. Hopefully he is, but honestly I think this year is going to be a bad one for Harris. I just want to see what happens when he's the one other teams throw at. I think it'll be much like in 2003 and 2004 when he got scortched most of the year.

[SkinBasket]

Hey, the market changes, and you want your salary to reflect the market. I still don't understand why, when a team cuts a guy who has a contract, nobody seems to mind. That's not honoring the contract. But when a guy would like to re-do his contract, everybody's all up about "honor" and other ideals. Why shouldn't an NFL team have to honor a contract they made, no matter how stupid (i.e. Cletidus Hunt) it was?

That shit is all negotiated by the union in their CBA. The team is the party offering the contract to the player, not the other way around, and part of that contract is that there are terms under which the team can release the player from the contract. The parties are not equal as it is still a employer/employee relationship, no matter how many concessions the players union extorts out of the owners. So yes, the teams do "honor" the contracts in the sense that they are doing what is allowed them under the rules of the contract.

Another thing. If you want player salaries to reflect the market, then teams should be able to retroactively scale back signing bonuses when a player underpreforms, shouldn't they? Or should their salary only reflect the market when they play the way they are supposed to?

[Harlan Huckleby]

I'm still mad as hell at Jason Wilde for causing all this trouble.

[SkinBasket]

Owners would hate it, but screw them, when was the last time they ever blew somebody up in the hole.

When was the last time a linebacker managed an NFL team?

When was the last time a McDonald's CEO dropped a bin of fries?

When was the last time Bill Gates screwed a mainboard into a computer frame?

When was the last time you washed your own car?

[CaptainKickass]

I guess what I don't understand in the Harris situation is why "telling" isn't enough.

Is it not enough to voice your opinion that - hey "I feel a bit slighted by the giant bonus you gave to Chuck Woodson"?

His agent has stated that he will not stage a hold out, so why can't they just send an email to TT and be done? Why must the theatrics be a part of what they are trying to accomplish?

[jack's smirking revenge]

His agent has stated that he will not stage a hold out, so why can't they just send an email to TT and be done? Why must the theatrics be a part of what they are trying to accomplish?

Agreed. Why does this have to be public, considering he doesn't intend to hold out? You know it will be a bigger issue next year...

Oh, you know why it has to be public? Because the NFL is one of the biggest purveyors of entertainment in the world. It's a massive soap opera with overpaid actors. Yes, they're talented people, but other than providing you and me a few hours of solace with a ganj cigarette or a tankard of ale a week, what are they truly contributing to our culture? They play a game...Perhaps we should start shelling out cash to watch Everquest nerds beat up Trolls (and not Rastak or Dabaddestbear).

Off my soapbox now. This WILL NEVER END. Just as soon as we give a starter more money, another one gets irritated and threatens to leave, holdout or sitout. What is the answer?

Lower demand. Lower expectations. Bring millionaire TV stars back down to Earth. Harris' grumbling is the precursor to a solidified stance that he feels "underappreciated", which equals "give me more money". In the end, he will most likely get it because we showed Woodson the money.

tyler

[Noodle]

When was the last time a linebacker managed an NFL team?

When was the last time a McDonald's CEO dropped a bin of fries?

When was the last time Bill Gates screwed a mainboard into a computer frame?

When was the last time you washed your own car?

Let's see:
1. Ted Thompson
2. Fairly recently, according to this: http://www.usatoday.com/money/indust...cdonalds_x.htm
3. He didn't screw a mainboard, but he has screwed Apple, IBM, and Netscape. Anyway, he just got fired.
4. Not since my kids turned 12.

I don't get your point. Are you saying that I watch football games so that I can enjoy the managerial acumen of guys like Snyder and Jones? And I thought I was digging ol' no. 4.

Wonder where I can get Harlan's autograph.

[Carolina_Packer]

The players and their agents I'm sure know the drill. They sign the deal, they know that the culture is for teams to cut guys before their deals are done if they are no longer valuable to the club and that many of the deals are only worth what the team is paying in a pro-rated signing bonus, otherwise the contract is all but worthless, but looks good in the headlines when it's announced that someone is receiving a 7 year 70 million dollar deal.

As far as teams "honoring" a contract, isn't 'dead money' that the club takes on, in fact, honoring what remains to be paid out on the contract? Again, if you didn't like the contract, why did you sign it? If you believe you are a star calibre player, why not get the incentives into your contract before you sign it? It's stupid to complain about what you are worth after you sign a deal. Incentives can protect a player's pay too, especially if they are able to reach them and stay healthy. Obviously you don't want the entire contract to be incentives, but should get some of this performance-based money built in as incentive bonuses, so you do get paid when you reach these incentives. Is that too simplistic?

[Chubbyhubby]

Its sort of funny that when I posted this article Harris's contract dispute never came up. It stated that Harris is overrated and a good player. Everyone went on the contract issue. They are makng these OTA's a bigger issue than its supposed to be. Harris doesn't have to report to these and he hasn't so what?

[jack's smirking revenge]

Its sort of funny that when I posted this article Harris's contract dispute never came up. It stated that Harris is overrated and a good player. Everyone went on the contract issue. They are makng these OTA's a bigger issue than its supposed to be. Harris doesn't have to report to these and he hasn't so what?

I think the point is that I've read elsewhere is that he's trying to make a mild statement regarding the unhappiness around his contract. If that's real, then his grumbling will get louder. If it's fabricated by the media, then he will most likely step up and quash the specualation.

The fact that both of our starting corners didn't show up for OTAs is a cause for concern. Training camp will probably tell the tale, but it still is a cause for concern.

tyler

[woodbuck27]

"Why shouldn't an NFL team have to honor a contract they made, no matter how stupid (i.e. Cletidus Hunt) it was?" Fritz

Because the team deserves to expect a certain level of performance from that player who inked the new fat contract.

If he gets as fat and out of shape in body . .or head soon after signing a new contract,he has to be deemed expendable. NFL players are expected to remain in good physical shape and have proper winning attitudes for the good of the team, not for selfish motives.

A trashy attitude and mouth = TRASH.

A CONTRACT is just that . . a CONTRACT. It has to be worded to protect both sides.

Al Harris arguably, would have served himself best by being at the OTA's as far as wanting a new CONTRACT. Being at the OTA's certainly wouldn't have hurt him.

This thing with Harris and a new Contract, is a time thing now and between him and his agent and TT. It should be shoved to the side as not to be any distraction, to the team's endeavors as a whole.