There is no difference between Jackson/Pickett, Favre/Rodgers except we don't have the benefit of hindsight.
Late 2003 GB can't stop the run so they pick up Grady Jackson from New Orleans. Next thing you know they sneak into the playoffs and have Philly beat only to fold their shot at the title. Many believed they would of crushed Carolina.
2004 season, game 1, MNF, GB pounds Carolina on the road. Carolina had just barely lost in the last Super Bowl to a not necessarily the greatest in NFL history NE team. To the casual fan GB looks like a powerhouse. Then Grady Jackson goes down and GB loses 4 in a row and are sitting at 1-4. Game 5, another MNF game against TN was extremely brutal. GB looked worse in those 4 losses then they did yesterday if that is possible. Jackson come back week 6 and they start winning again. Then TT comes on board and cuts Jackson after the season. Nobody said anything then but I knew GB must have Jackson on the field to compete.
We could have Grady Jackson right now or we can have Ryan Pickett. I think it's a no brainer. Jackson was a huge part of Oakland's success, just ask
Woodson. GB was not going to win a Super Bowl in 2005 with Jackson in there but him not being in the line-up contributed greatly to 4-12. The guy was very underrated and GB was really cheap with him. I guess he must of been a pain in their ass like Favre and was getting fatter and older. Pickett was just starting to show his talent with STL.
What the hell am I getting at? GB is going to look lousy without Ryan Pickett and he hasn't played yet. TT made the right move by dumping Jackson, he just didn't replace him until 2006. Are we going to be laughing 3 years from now at the people who questioned TT for putting Rodgers in there? I am laughing now because TT couldn't do it last year or even the year before because of the fanatics who would scream bloody murder for his head.
Late 2003 GB can't stop the run so they pick up Grady Jackson from New Orleans. Next thing you know they sneak into the playoffs and have Philly beat only to fold their shot at the title. Many believed they would of crushed Carolina.
2004 season, game 1, MNF, GB pounds Carolina on the road. Carolina had just barely lost in the last Super Bowl to a not necessarily the greatest in NFL history NE team. To the casual fan GB looks like a powerhouse. Then Grady Jackson goes down and GB loses 4 in a row and are sitting at 1-4. Game 5, another MNF game against TN was extremely brutal. GB looked worse in those 4 losses then they did yesterday if that is possible. Jackson come back week 6 and they start winning again. Then TT comes on board and cuts Jackson after the season. Nobody said anything then but I knew GB must have Jackson on the field to compete.
We could have Grady Jackson right now or we can have Ryan Pickett. I think it's a no brainer. Jackson was a huge part of Oakland's success, just ask
Woodson. GB was not going to win a Super Bowl in 2005 with Jackson in there but him not being in the line-up contributed greatly to 4-12. The guy was very underrated and GB was really cheap with him. I guess he must of been a pain in their ass like Favre and was getting fatter and older. Pickett was just starting to show his talent with STL.
What the hell am I getting at? GB is going to look lousy without Ryan Pickett and he hasn't played yet. TT made the right move by dumping Jackson, he just didn't replace him until 2006. Are we going to be laughing 3 years from now at the people who questioned TT for putting Rodgers in there? I am laughing now because TT couldn't do it last year or even the year before because of the fanatics who would scream bloody murder for his head.

Comment