Heading Them Off At The Pass

[digitaldean]

Mongo love Sheriff A-Rod, errr , Bart.

[Zool]

Mongo not like that. Mongo straight.

[LEWCWA]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

[Zool]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

[BallHawk]

Candygram for Aaron! Candygram for Aaron!

[KYPack]

who's mongo then?

Alex Karras

Pic above.

[BallHawk]

[GBRulz]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

About as useful as this thread itself.

[Zool]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

About as useful as this thread itself.

To quote a specific poster "how about if you don't like the subject, ignore the thread."

[GBRulz]

So, it's ok for you to throw sarcastic remarks at someone saying their remark was well though out, but i can't say anything back ?

[Charles Woodson]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :

"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"

I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:

1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.

So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.

Christ your already planning for his failure. At least folks waited for Brett to screw up b4 making excuses for him. RETARD

Well that was helpful and well thought out.

About as useful as this thread itself.

To quote a specific poster "how about if you don't like the subject, ignore the thread."

GBRulz im with you on that, but then again you did say that... Cant have it both ways...

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Cant have it both ways...

Members of the fairer sex often can have it both ways.

[GBRulz]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Yeah, I guess this isn't Burger King, is it?

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Heading Them Off At The Pass

Yeah, I guess this isn't Burger King, is it?

You do know there's a "whopper" joke coming from Tyrone any moment now.

[bobblehead]

Fuck you Shadow.

Tyrone,

It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.

dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.

Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!!