Originally posted by mraynrand
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Preseason Quarterback plan failing due to lack of Quarters
Collapse
X
-
So you think they're NOT concerned? I guess they'd be the first worry-free coach and GM in the NFL....Originally posted by texaspackerbackerMe and Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson. I call that pretty good company.Originally posted by mraynrandTex, if you think there isn't something to be concerned about having a QB group with no starts and two rookies, you're probably the only one. The concern has nothing to do with poor play in one game. It has to do with the realities with the lack of experience at the QB position. If I get a chance, I'll try to see if there are any comparable situations in recent NFL history."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Re: Preseason Quarterback plan failing due to lack of Quarte
ya, but Brohm kicks ass in the punt, pass and kick competition. So it seems likely still that he will be the better bet. It would be somewhat painful to place Flynn ahead of him, Flynn is not so impressive physically. You are right, though, ultimately Flynn could be the better player, but Brohm deserves extra do-overs.Originally posted by JoemailmanIf Flynn is playing well, does it really matter what round he was drafted in? It's not like he's from Southern Appalachian State. He led LSU to a national title. He's likely played against tougher competition than Brohm.
A preseason is not much time for ANY rookie to get up to speed. How much total playing time to they get, after all.
Comment
-
There's a difference between healthy natural concern, as any coach has, and the pessimism/negativity/near panic exhibited in a lot of the posts we've seen around here. If Thompson/McCarthy had anything vaguely resembling that, the posters crying for some worn out veteran QB would have had their wish by now.Originally posted by mraynrandSo you think they're NOT concerned? I guess they'd be the first worry-free coach and GM in the NFL....Originally posted by texaspackerbackerMe and Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson. I call that pretty good company.Originally posted by mraynrandTex, if you think there isn't something to be concerned about having a QB group with no starts and two rookies, you're probably the only one. The concern has nothing to do with poor play in one game. It has to do with the realities with the lack of experience at the QB position. If I get a chance, I'll try to see if there are any comparable situations in recent NFL history.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
well, then you will be backtracking like usual when TT signs a vet later...for a cheaper price than available now.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerThere's a difference between healthy natural concern, as any coach has, and the pessimism/negativity/near panic exhibited in a lot of the posts we've seen around here. If Thompson/McCarthy had anything vaguely resembling that, the posters crying for some worn out veteran QB would have had their wish by now.Originally posted by mraynrandSo you think they're NOT concerned? I guess they'd be the first worry-free coach and GM in the NFL....Originally posted by texaspackerbackerMe and Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson. I call that pretty good company.Originally posted by mraynrandTex, if you think there isn't something to be concerned about having a QB group with no starts and two rookies, you're probably the only one. The concern has nothing to do with poor play in one game. It has to do with the realities with the lack of experience at the QB position. If I get a chance, I'll try to see if there are any comparable situations in recent NFL history.
Comment
-
Hell No! I never backtrack--well, almost never.
I really don't think Thompson would do that except for an injury that would put one of the current QBs on the injured list. If it did happen, though, I would certainly criticize the move--although probably not the highly successful GM making the move.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
You'll be backtracking just like you did with favre.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerHell No! I never backtrack--well, almost never.
I really don't think Thompson would do that except for an injury that would put on of the current QBs on the injured list. If it did happen, though, I would certainly criticize the move--although probably not the highly successful GM making the move.
The only real question is how long before you start blaming the media for the QB issue.
Comment
-
I backtracked about Favre?
What could you possibly misconstrue as being anything like that?
The media to blame? Hmmm. I'll give that some thought ....... but wait ...... in order blame somebody, there has to be a PROBLEM. I see no problem here.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
What about Mark Murphy, think he's worried?Originally posted by mraynrandSo you think they're NOT concerned? I guess they'd be the first worry-free coach and GM in the NFL....Originally posted by texaspackerbackerMe and Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson. I call that pretty good company.Originally posted by mraynrandTex, if you think there isn't something to be concerned about having a QB group with no starts and two rookies, you're probably the only one. The concern has nothing to do with poor play in one game. It has to do with the realities with the lack of experience at the QB position. If I get a chance, I'll try to see if there are any comparable situations in recent NFL history.

Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.
Comment

Comment