Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Addicted to that rush

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by VegasPackFan
    I didnt intend to start any debates with this post - it's my own little tribute.
    Like the man said ........ There was nothing debatable--no controversy, just nice nostalgia.

    I will say this, though. What we have now--I've got to stick in a PROBABLY at this point--is going to be ultimately more satisfying. A near-one man team--or at least one that lives and dies with the quality swings of a superstar IMO is a lot less substantial than "doing it right"--having a balanced team in a team game. THAT is what we have now--PROBABLY.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by The Leaper
      Originally posted by falco
      favre stopped being able to win games by himself 10 years ago, IMHO
      Then you weren't really watching that closely.

      Favre STILL has the capacity to win games all by himself...although those games are far more infrequent now than they were 10 years ago.

      That is the point you may be trying to make...poorly.
      You are really splitting hairs.

      And, if he is able to do it...infrequently, then he is no different than most of the QBs in the league.

      Comment

      Working...
      X