Predict the Packers 2008 record

[mngolf19]

7-9 I see a tough start and tough times on the road. Maybe a couple better but no more. And depending on Rodgers health it could go alot worse.

[Scott Campbell]

7-9 I see a tough start and tough times on the road. Maybe a couple better but no more. And depending on Rodgers health it could go alot worse.

I see the Vikings at 9-7. But 12-4 if T-Jack gets hurt.

[retailguy]

7-9 I see a tough start and tough times on the road. Maybe a couple better but no more. And depending on Rodgers health it could go alot worse.

I see the Vikings at 9-7. But 12-4 if T-Jack gets hurt.

Of course that is based on a 2 back set with a direct snap to AP.

[mngolf19]

7-9 I see a tough start and tough times on the road. Maybe a couple better but no more. And depending on Rodgers health it could go alot worse.

I see the Vikings at 9-7. But 12-4 if T-Jack gets hurt.

Touche'

[Freak Out]

15-1......after losing to the Vikings on MNF to open the season we roll.


Roll another one MTP.

[wpony]

Minnesota Vikings - win
@ Detroit Lions - Win
Dallas Cowboys - loss
@ Tampa Bay Buccaneers - win
Atlanta Falcons - Win
@ Seattle Seahawks - Loss
Indianapolis Colts - Loss
@ Tennessee Titans - win
@ Minnesota Vikings - Win
Chicago Bears - win
@ New Orleans Saints - win
Carolina Panthers - loss
Houston Texans - Win
@ Jacksonville Jaguars Loss
@ Chicago Bears - win
Detroit Lions - Win
11-5 if Arod stays healty

[SnakeLH2006]

Re: Predict the Packers 2008 record

Wow so many variables...We had the ironman for years, but go with Arod who will be pretty decent, but this is my list IF he's healthy (otherwise 6-10 without him)....


Predict the Packers 2008 record - game by game:

Minnesota Vikings - WIN
@ Detroit Lions - WIN
Dallas Cowboys - LOSS
@ Tampa Bay Buccaneers - LOSS
Atlanta Falcons - WIN
@ Seattle Seahawks - LOSS
Indianapolis Colts - LOSS
@ Tennessee Titans - LOSS
@ Minnesota Vikings - LOSS
Chicago Bears - WIN
@ New Orleans Saints - WIN
Carolina Panthers - WIN
Houston Texans - WIN
@ Jacksonville Jaguars LOSS
@ Chicago Bears - WIN
Detroit Lions - WIN

[b]

Wow...didn't really look at that tough schedule till now, so 9-7 I guess, but there will be surprises. On average over the past 5 years 5 teams who MISSED the playoffs the previous years, made the playoffs, thus, some teams WE thought would be good/bad reverse trends..Hopefully not ours. Regardless of the teams, my true prediction is 10-6 coming on strong to do some damage playoff time IF Arod is healthy.....Regardless...it's fun to look at these a year later, who THOUGHT the Pack would be 13-3 last year?

[mmmdk]

Re: Predict the Packers 2008 record

On average over the past 5 years 5 teams who MISSED the playoffs the previous years, made the playoffs, thus, some teams WE thought would be good/bad reverse trends..Hopefully not ours.

Very acute! Packers are not there yet. This is the tell tale season; where are we headed? Injuries have a say but injuries can't hide obvious talent. Even a mediocre record could be "good news" if upside is there. NFL is a brutal 16 games season; U better be ready in september or miss the playoff train. Stats don't lie but one year records can.

[GrnBay007]

SI's projected standings -

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/football/nfl/specials/preview/2008/08/26/main/index.html?eref=T1

Minnesota Vikings 13-3
Green Bay Packers 9-7
Detroit Lions 7-9
Chicago Bears 6-10

[HarveyWallbangers]

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8482264/Forget-chic-sleeper-picks,-here-are-real-dark-horses-

We're too sexy: This year's sleeper picks

Minnesota Vikings: Everyone's sexy sleeper pick out of the NFC, the Vikes are the preseason favorites in the NFC North. Too much hype. What's a non-Vikings, non-Bears, non-Lions postseason mean? The Aaron Rodgers-led Packers are winning the NFC North. Sorry, Vikes fans.

[GBRulz]

SI's projected standings -

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/football/nfl/specials/preview/2008/08/26/main/index.html?eref=T1

Minnesota Vikings 13-3
Green Bay Packers 9-7
Detroit Lions 7-9
Chicago Bears 6-10

It just wouldn't be right without labeling the Queens as some kind of paper champion every year!

[Fritz]

If they don't get too whacked with injuries, I see 9 - 7.

[Cheesehead Craig]

10-6. I think we win in more higher scoring games than we like to see.

[oregonpackfan]

SI's projected standings -

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/football/nfl/specials/preview/2008/08/26/main/index.html?eref=T1

Minnesota Vikings 13-3
Green Bay Packers 9-7
Detroit Lions 7-9
Chicago Bears 6-10

The Vikings at 13-3?! There is just no way.

This prediction come from the same magazine that ranks the Oregon State Beavers as 18th in the nation for college football! The Beavers hardly lived up to their ranking when they lost to Stanford last night.

[Scott Campbell]

SI's projected standings -

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/football/nfl/specials/preview/2008/08/26/main/index.html?eref=T1

Minnesota Vikings 13-3
Green Bay Packers 9-7
Detroit Lions 7-9
Chicago Bears 6-10

It just wouldn't be right without labeling the Queens as some kind of paper champion every year!

I dunno. They better do something with AP. Those kind of players don't come along very often.