Originally posted by Packerarcher
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers exploring trade for DT
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BrohmTurn back the clock to this time last year and change it to RB and your point is refuted. Or is that just the "dumb luck" arguementOriginally posted by PackerarcherEven if there was a steal of a DT available TT would not do it. It is not the TT way to do thins that make sense and promote winning.
This guy sounds more and more like Tank.
Comment
-
My unofficial count has 3 'Tanks' posting on PackerratsOriginally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by BrohmTurn back the clock to this time last year and change it to RB and your point is refuted. Or is that just the "dumb luck" arguementOriginally posted by PackerarcherEven if there was a steal of a DT available TT would not do it. It is not the TT way to do thins that make sense and promote winning.
This guy sounds more and more like Tank."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Yep. And that Ngata was touted by some, if I recall, Bob McGinn thought he was a prospect. I can't quite recall the circumstances, but I remember him being escorted off the field this preseason - have to look it up to see if it was serious.Originally posted by NoodleDang, how about some props for Sparky for pulling out that sweet list of jumbo DTs sitting around in Bal'more.
Looks like some opportunity for dealing (unlikely) or waiting until the end of TC to see who gets cut."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Ngata is a stud. He was a first rounder in 2006 and has been pretty steady. He got his leg hurt at the end of July, but he'll likely be back by week 1 or 2, if the latest reports are accurate.
I'm thinking no way the Ravens part with him, but I'd love to have the guy; he's stout as hell and a certifiable run stopper.
Comment
-
I have to believe TT will swing a deal for a tackle..
He almost has to with the lack of performance so far... No Harrel (again) Jolly's status (legal and health)..
Wonder if he regrets trading Williams now?My Two favorite teams are the Packers, and whoever plays the Vikings!
Comment
-
Sigh.Originally posted by The LeaperI don't think there was anything shrewd. The Giants had too many good RBs. Thompson knew it...and asked them which one they would part with for a late round pick because we needed one. That choice was made by the Giants...not Thompson.Originally posted by mraynrandMaybe the Grant trade wasn't a miracle - Thomson obviously doesn't like to part with picks, so perhaps he just saw something others missed in Grant, and simply made a shrewd move.
Thirty other teams DIDN'T obtain him.
Why is it always so difficult to extend Thompson any credit?Who Knows? The Shadow knows!
Comment
-
The only thing is a lot of those guys listed at DT for Baltimore actually play DE in their scheme, so they aren't as short on DEs and as deep at DT as you'd think.Originally posted by NoodleDang, how about some props for Sparky for pulling out that sweet list of jumbo DTs sitting around in Bal'more.
Looks like some opportunity for dealing (unlikely) or waiting until the end of TC to see who gets cut."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
I don't know. If those guys are all actually DTs (instead of DT/DE as HW pointed out) this is a similar situation to what the Giants had last year, an overabundance of players at one position, and they might well be willing to take a 6th or 7th rounder to get some value instead of releasing the player.Originally posted by NoodleDang, how about some props for Sparky for pulling out that sweet list of jumbo DTs sitting around in Bal'more.
Looks like some opportunity for dealing (unlikely) or waiting until the end of TC to see who gets cut.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment


Comment