Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Culpepper open to backup role with the Pack?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by MadtownPacker
    The only reason TT should sign culpepper is so they can cut him at halftime of the MNF opener against his old team. Then all the Lambeau crowd can get their roll on as he is escorted to the parking lot.
    SCORE! I'd love to be there for that. People could moon him too.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by mngolf19
      After seeing Chilly's response to last night's preseason game, if you put Flynn on the practice squad he will be a Viking by the next morning.
      I'm guessing they'd keep 4--like the Bucs did last year.
      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Gunakor
        Flynn has rightfully earned his spot on our team IMO.
        Thats the way I see it too. I just can't see TT losing Flynn who could turn out to be very good.

        Comment


        • #19
          Now that I think about it, Flynn would never make it to the PS even if TT and MM wanted him to. He'd have to clear waivers first, which would never happen after the preseason performances he's put together. If we bring in a veteran QB, Flynn is as good as gone. No way I'd let Flynn get away. When all is said and done, Flynn might turn out to be the biggest steal in this years draft. Honestly, I think he might just turn out to be an adequate backup THIS year. He didn't look to shabby against the Titan's #1's. About what I'd expect from a backup QB, and certainly more than I'd expect from a 7th round rookie. I think we're good at QB.
          Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

          Comment


          • #20
            Remember when Shermy gave Wells a bigger contract to stay on the practice squad?
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mraynrand
              Remember when Shermy gave Wells a bigger contract to stay on the practice squad?
              Yes, but that was to be on our PS instead of someone else's PS. Gave him a small bonus, and roughly double the PS minimum wage, IIRC.

              If another team had called to put him on their roster - pfft, he woulda been gone.
              --
              Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

              Comment


              • #22
                IIRC if you claim someone off another teams PS, they have to be put on your 53.
                Originally posted by 3irty1
                This is museum quality stupidity.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by bobblehead
                  where have I heard this before?? A guy we wanted in camp to learn the offense and work with the team told us no, but now that all the work is done, he is interested? He is of little use at this point.
                  That ain't exactly the scenario. We lowballed him and choose to look elsewhere. Can't blame him for that.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Zool
                    IIRC if you claim someone off another teams PS, they have to be put on your 53.
                    Are you sure about that?

                    I do know you can sign them to your 53..and only keep them for 3 weeks.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Yes he is. You cannot claim a player off of someone else's practice squad to put them on your own practice squad. The only way is to give him a roster spot.
                      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
                        Why cut a Packer player for the likes of Fumblepepper?
                        because a credible backup QB is far more critical than the 53rd guy on the roster.

                        Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
                        We will ride out the risk to Rodgers. Even next year, 2 second year reserves will not be ideal.

                        It is a very risky 2 years (without Brett).
                        what does favre have to do with it?

                        and the problem is this season only

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Just say no to Culpecker.


                          Brohm and Flynn are too talented not to get scooped up and Culpecker is not good enough to give up on a talented rookie like Giacomini or a ST's stud like Tracy White. No thanks. I'll take the chance that Flynn or Brohm is ready if Rodgers goes down this year and go into next year with a great QB situation with Rodgers starting and Flynn/Brohm being developed and ready. It's a one year risk, but sometimes you have to take risks as a GM. It's bold, but we're all clammering for bold moves, right?
                          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Yeah, we're clammoring for bold moves, not stupid ones.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X