Charles Woodson (toe) will be a game-time decision

[bobblehead]

My personal opinion is that against dallas we should have al take crayton out of the game and double TO with woodson and a safety. Al gets to cranked by TO and doesn't play his best, but he would own crayton allowing a comfortable double team.

[RashanGary]

"Where is the commitment from the team to the vets who have been committed? Going with an essentially rookie quarterback who is extremely unproven over a guy who was selected by knowledgeable journalists (read: not your average Rodgers supporter here) to be the second best player in the NFL last year.

Respect and commitment are a two way street, and while Chad Clifton may have been extremely committed all off-season where is the team's commitment to his desire to win and reward for his commitment and hard work? What a joke."



This was a randomly selected quote from Partial (I'm sure there are dozens of doom and gloomers based on losing Brett). Funny how the team goes from a "joke" that is not committed to winning to one of the NFC's best.


EDIT: haha, I just caught it, but this post is complete with a "Rodgers supporter" blast. Too ironic.

[packers11]

woodson better be careful, he may be the nickel back when he gets healthy

not that big of a drop off from him to t-will, but the nickel spot will be weak

I hope your being sarcastic... Woodson is 10x better than T-Will...

In my opinion Woodson is better than Harris...

Still have the same opinion???

T-Will better watch his back at the #3 spot...

[Partial]

"Where is the commitment from the team to the vets who have been committed? Going with an essentially rookie quarterback who is extremely unproven over a guy who was selected by knowledgeable journalists (read: not your average Rodgers supporter here) to be the second best player in the NFL last year.

Respect and commitment are a two way street, and while Chad Clifton may have been extremely committed all off-season where is the team's commitment to his desire to win and reward for his commitment and hard work? What a joke."



This was a randomly selected quote from Partial (I'm sure there are dozens of doom and gloomers based on losing Brett). Funny how the team goes from a "joke" that is not committed to winning to one of the NFC's best.


EDIT: haha, I just caught it, but this post is complete with a "Rodgers supporter" blast. Too ironic.

It's not even worth it, but I will. Where did I claim they'd be a bad team in that post? Where did I say anything about Rodgers? Rodgers has played very well so far, but that does not negate the risk factor in going with an unproven commodity versus a known commodity.

What is ironic at all? The difference between you and me is I'm not a cock to people and like to rub it in their faces. Let's not forget how great Vernon Davis is, or how about Neon Hawkins. Quit the bullshit.

[Chevelle2]

"Where is the commitment from the team to the vets who have been committed? Going with an essentially rookie quarterback who is extremely unproven over a guy who was selected by knowledgeable journalists (read: not your average Rodgers supporter here) to be the second best player in the NFL last year.

Respect and commitment are a two way street, and while Chad Clifton may have been extremely committed all off-season where is the team's commitment to his desire to win and reward for his commitment and hard work? What a joke."



This was a randomly selected quote from Partial (I'm sure there are dozens of doom and gloomers based on losing Brett). Funny how the team goes from a "joke" that is not committed to winning to one of the NFC's best.


EDIT: haha, I just caught it, but this post is complete with a "Rodgers supporter" blast. Too ironic.

It's not even worth it, but I will. Where did I claim they'd be a bad team in that post? Where did I say anything about Rodgers? Rodgers has played very well so far, but that does not negate the risk factor in going with an unproven commodity versus a known commodity.

What is ironic at all? The difference between you and me is I'm not a cock to people and like to rub it in their faces. Let's not forget how great Vernon Davis is, or how about Neon Hawkins. Quit the bullshit.

A known quantity isnt always better than an unknown quantity.

By that logic David Carr > Rodgers.

Color me old fashioned, but I kind of like not having interceptions where our QB just "didn't see the safety over the top"

[Lurker64]

Color me old fashioned, but I'd like to see a lot less finger pointing, recrimination, selective quoting, and general "I told you so" shenanigans.

If you want to thumb your nose at Packer doubters, kindly do so at people who are not also Packer fans. I'm sure there are some professional journalists who said some silly things claiming this team would be terrible out of the gate with Rodgers who really won't mind if you bring up their error on a Packer board.

[Partial]

"Where is the commitment from the team to the vets who have been committed? Going with an essentially rookie quarterback who is extremely unproven over a guy who was selected by knowledgeable journalists (read: not your average Rodgers supporter here) to be the second best player in the NFL last year.

Respect and commitment are a two way street, and while Chad Clifton may have been extremely committed all off-season where is the team's commitment to his desire to win and reward for his commitment and hard work? What a joke."



This was a randomly selected quote from Partial (I'm sure there are dozens of doom and gloomers based on losing Brett). Funny how the team goes from a "joke" that is not committed to winning to one of the NFC's best.


EDIT: haha, I just caught it, but this post is complete with a "Rodgers supporter" blast. Too ironic.

It's not even worth it, but I will. Where did I claim they'd be a bad team in that post? Where did I say anything about Rodgers? Rodgers has played very well so far, but that does not negate the risk factor in going with an unproven commodity versus a known commodity.

What is ironic at all? The difference between you and me is I'm not a cock to people and like to rub it in their faces. Let's not forget how great Vernon Davis is, or how about Neon Hawkins. Quit the bullshit.

A known quantity isnt always better than an unknown quantity.

By that logic David Carr > Rodgers.

Color me old fashioned, but I kind of like not having interceptions where our QB just "didn't see the safety over the top"

Oye..

Seriously. This is getting old. Brett Favre isn't David Carr. No one said he is. Rodgers may be even better than Favre in time. Who knows. The point is. When you've got a really good quarterback, do you need to make a switch to someone else? That is what my post discusses. Please cut the irrelevant bullshit out. You're wasting my time.

Favre played lights old against the vikings and the lions last year. Posted a 145 and 115 rating. Similiar to Rodgers. Again.. relevance.. Get this outta here.

[Kiwon]

Woodson needs to play hurt every week.

Gambled on the Lions' TD play but also had 2 picks. Great game.