Wade Phillips was up for Packers job

[Tyrone Bigguns]

--a Yale man,

Tex, any reason you pronounce the fact? Are you a Yale man? Maybe you are on record for your opinion here about this, but I missed it and I am curious.

Tex isn't a Yale man.

Neither is Jason Garrett. But, for Tex, all those elitist ivy schools are the same.

[bobblehead]

how many playoff games has wade won in his entire coaching career?

[the_idle_threat]

kissingsuzykolber.com has the inside scoop on the management and coaching relationships between Wade Phillips, Jason Garrett and ol' Jerry Jones.

[sheepshead]

I think what the "What is the point of this thread" is the fact that the MJS brought up an item that people already knew about(Wade Phillips intrerviewing for the Packers job) like it was news. Why talk about something you knew years ago?

Sheepshead;

I see you thanked cpk for this comment, but if that is really what you meant, why did you refer to "this thread" as opposed to "the article" or some such other reference?

You aren't fooling me. You have openly and often criticized people for starting threads, even asking if they think at all before starting them. I suspect you were criticizing the thread this time, too; not the underlying article. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

However, if that was your intent, I will respond to that criticism too. The link was to a Fox Sports quote from the Journal, not to an entire JS article. I think it was a quote from one of those blog entries that become part of the "next opponent" articles that will also tell us many, many other things that most of us already know, such as that Romo grew up in Wisconsin, backup QB Brooks Bollinger played for the Badgers, and Cowboys receivers coach Ray Sherman spent five years coaching the Packers. If you expect newspaper articles to bring up only information rabid fans such as us don't already know, very few articles would be written.

Who fucking cares what you think. Leave me the fuck alone you mindless twit.

[Brando19]

I think what the "What is the point of this thread" is the fact that the MJS brought up an item that people already knew about(Wade Phillips intrerviewing for the Packers job) like it was news. Why talk about something you knew years ago?

Sheepshead;

I see you thanked cpk for this comment, but if that is really what you meant, why did you refer to "this thread" as opposed to "the article" or some such other reference?

You aren't fooling me. You have openly and often criticized people for starting threads, even asking if they think at all before starting them. I suspect you were criticizing the thread this time, too; not the underlying article. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

However, if that was your intent, I will respond to that criticism too. The link was to a Fox Sports quote from the Journal, not to an entire JS article. I think it was a quote from one of those blog entries that become part of the "next opponent" articles that will also tell us many, many other things that most of us already know, such as that Romo grew up in Wisconsin, backup QB Brooks Bollinger played for the Badgers, and Cowboys receivers coach Ray Sherman spent five years coaching the Packers. If you expect newspaper articles to bring up only information rabid fans such as us don't already know, very few articles would be written.

Who fucking cares what you think. Leave me the fuck alone you mindless twit.

You're such a baby. Such a fucking little baby. Soon...everyone on here will be tired of your shit. You are the kind that makes a good forum turn sour.

[MJZiggy]

I think what the "What is the point of this thread" is the fact that the MJS brought up an item that people already knew about(Wade Phillips intrerviewing for the Packers job) like it was news. Why talk about something you knew years ago?

Sheepshead;

I see you thanked cpk for this comment, but if that is really what you meant, why did you refer to "this thread" as opposed to "the article" or some such other reference?

You aren't fooling me. You have openly and often criticized people for starting threads, even asking if they think at all before starting them. I suspect you were criticizing the thread this time, too; not the underlying article. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

However, if that was your intent, I will respond to that criticism too. The link was to a Fox Sports quote from the Journal, not to an entire JS article. I think it was a quote from one of those blog entries that become part of the "next opponent" articles that will also tell us many, many other things that most of us already know, such as that Romo grew up in Wisconsin, backup QB Brooks Bollinger played for the Badgers, and Cowboys receivers coach Ray Sherman spent five years coaching the Packers. If you expect newspaper articles to bring up only information rabid fans such as us don't already know, very few articles would be written.

Who fucking cares what you think. Leave me the fuck alone you mindless twit.

Do you recall what we discussed about comments like these? We had an agreement.

[sheepshead]

I think what the "What is the point of this thread" is the fact that the MJS brought up an item that people already knew about(Wade Phillips intrerviewing for the Packers job) like it was news. Why talk about something you knew years ago?

Sheepshead;

I see you thanked cpk for this comment, but if that is really what you meant, why did you refer to "this thread" as opposed to "the article" or some such other reference?

You aren't fooling me. You have openly and often criticized people for starting threads, even asking if they think at all before starting them. I suspect you were criticizing the thread this time, too; not the underlying article. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

However, if that was your intent, I will respond to that criticism too. The link was to a Fox Sports quote from the Journal, not to an entire JS article. I think it was a quote from one of those blog entries that become part of the "next opponent" articles that will also tell us many, many other things that most of us already know, such as that Romo grew up in Wisconsin, backup QB Brooks Bollinger played for the Badgers, and Cowboys receivers coach Ray Sherman spent five years coaching the Packers. If you expect newspaper articles to bring up only information rabid fans such as us don't already know, very few articles would be written.

Who fucking cares what you think. Leave me the fuck alone you mindless twit.

Do you recall what we discussed about comments like these? We had an agreement.

I do, but somehow, I am not entitled to an opinion according to some. I remember this guy now, he authored one of my favorite threads ever. Something to the effect of "Maybe TT and MM think Arod gives this team a better chance to win" -brilliant-

[Patler]

I think what the "What is the point of this thread" is the fact that the MJS brought up an item that people already knew about(Wade Phillips intrerviewing for the Packers job) like it was news. Why talk about something you knew years ago?

Sheepshead;

I see you thanked cpk for this comment, but if that is really what you meant, why did you refer to "this thread" as opposed to "the article" or some such other reference?

You aren't fooling me. You have openly and often criticized people for starting threads, even asking if they think at all before starting them. I suspect you were criticizing the thread this time, too; not the underlying article. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

However, if that was your intent, I will respond to that criticism too. The link was to a Fox Sports quote from the Journal, not to an entire JS article. I think it was a quote from one of those blog entries that become part of the "next opponent" articles that will also tell us many, many other things that most of us already know, such as that Romo grew up in Wisconsin, backup QB Brooks Bollinger played for the Badgers, and Cowboys receivers coach Ray Sherman spent five years coaching the Packers. If you expect newspaper articles to bring up only information rabid fans such as us don't already know, very few articles would be written.

Who fucking cares what you think. Leave me the fuck alone you mindless twit.

You post a remark, and others are not allowed to comment or disagree? Interesting concept, but it does not work well on a public board.

I guess I could have made the same response as you just have to your very first statement in this thread.

Now, as for mindless twits........

[Patler]

I think what the "What is the point of this thread" is the fact that the MJS brought up an item that people already knew about(Wade Phillips intrerviewing for the Packers job) like it was news. Why talk about something you knew years ago?

Sheepshead;

I see you thanked cpk for this comment, but if that is really what you meant, why did you refer to "this thread" as opposed to "the article" or some such other reference?

You aren't fooling me. You have openly and often criticized people for starting threads, even asking if they think at all before starting them. I suspect you were criticizing the thread this time, too; not the underlying article. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

However, if that was your intent, I will respond to that criticism too. The link was to a Fox Sports quote from the Journal, not to an entire JS article. I think it was a quote from one of those blog entries that become part of the "next opponent" articles that will also tell us many, many other things that most of us already know, such as that Romo grew up in Wisconsin, backup QB Brooks Bollinger played for the Badgers, and Cowboys receivers coach Ray Sherman spent five years coaching the Packers. If you expect newspaper articles to bring up only information rabid fans such as us don't already know, very few articles would be written.

Who fucking cares what you think. Leave me the fuck alone you mindless twit.

Do you recall what we discussed about comments like these? We had an agreement.

I do, but somehow, I am not entitled to an opinion according to some. I remember this guy now, he authored one of my favorite threads ever. Something to the effect of "Maybe TT and MM think Arod gives this team a better chance to win" -brilliant-

Of course your are entitled to an opinion, and I am entitled to disagree with your opinion. You expressed your opinion, I expressed my disagreement. It is really very simple.

[sheepshead]

Fuck You

[retailguy]

Ok, I don't understand the above comment, but lets get this back to football or let it die. Take your disagreement to PM's sheep if you can't keep it clean.

No reason for this in the football room.

[sheepshead]

Point taken, this guy is a nut, that somehow thinks if any of his lame-brain thoughts are challenged he can follow you around the forum like some sick stalker. He really needs to a get life.

[Patler]

Point taken, this guy is a nut, that somehow thinks if any of his lame-brain thoughts are challenged he can follow you around the forum like some sick stalker. He really needs to a get life.

I think I was challenging your comment, about the value of an article about Phillips having been interviewed for the Packer job (Phillips was the subject of this thread, after all.) You expressed disdain for the article (or this thread). It is my position that these types of game related articles occur all the time, and should be expected.

Your response?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Let me assist Sheep.

fuck you!!

[Lurker64]

And I thought this place was getting better...