Would the Jets have been better off with Rodgers?

[Harlan Huckleby]

I think last night's game was just the sort of game where the Jets could have used a QB like Aaron Rodgers. Favre threw the game away with two interceptions, and several near pickoffs. In a tight game like that, its seems like a more mobile and sure-handed QB like Rodgers could be more effective.

Your thoughts?

[Harlan Huckleby]

Don't blow a gasket, its just a joke. From the internet postings and call-in radio yesterday, its obvious that the Ultimate Favre Fans are going to get excited every time the Packers lose, and claim that this is just the sort of game where the Packers would have won with Favre at the helm. We saw some of this in packerrats.

I think we should be ready to laugh.

[PackerTimer]

Trying to stir up trouble, huh.

[Harlan Huckleby]

are you feeling troubled?

i'm doing some reverse-trouble making. It's OK, I didn't sign the pledge. :P

[packerbacker1234]

Re: Would the Jets have been better off with Rodgers?

I think last night's game was just the sort of game where the Jets could have used a QB like Aaron Rodgers. Favre threw the game away with two interceptions, and several near pickoffs. In a tight game like that, its seems like a more mobile and sure-handed QB like Rodgers could be more effective.

Your thoughts?

Threw the game away you say?


lets see - put 29 points on the board, would of been 30+ if no 2 pointers were tried.

How many points did AR put on the board? hmm?

Besides, neither int was blaringly favre's fault. One was a guy doing a out in a one on one situation,a nd cromartie came over the top and scooped it in the air with one hand and grabbed it while laying on the reciver's back. That is favre's fault how?

Then, the other. No one knows who is to blame, cept the WR and the QB. It was a coverage read play, and favre threw it to the outside and deep, the wr came short and to the inside. It was a communication error. Of course, the media will side with favre was right, but the truth is no one knows. Fact remains, the guy who picked that ball off would not have if the WR would of went to where apparently favre thought he was going.

Anyways, thats niether here nor there. So, last night's game was a perfect example where the jets could of used AR huh? Really? No turnovers, but no TD's? Against the chargers? You think your going to beat the chargers WITHOUT putting points on the board? Wow.

[Bossman641]

Don't blow a gasket, its just a joke. From the internet postings and call-in radio yesterday, its obvious that the Ultimate Favre Fans are going to get excited every time the Packers lose, and claim that this is just the sort of game where the Packers would have won with Favre at the helm. We saw some of this in packerrats.

I think we should be ready to laugh.

Sunday was just the type of game where Favre would have tried to force things in the 3rd/4th quarters, would have ended up with 3-4 picks, and we'd be sitting in here scratching our heads over how he could make such a boneheaded throw.

Pacopete would blame the receivers for running the wrong routes, Woody would blame MM for the playcalling, and Merlin would blame TT for assembling such a shitty team.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Re: Would the Jets have been better off with Rodgers?

Threw the game away you say?


lets see - put 29 points on the board, would of been 30+ if no 2 pointers were tried.

I think Favre played pretty well, I was just joking. Or being an asshole. Or pretending to be an asshole. However you want to look at it.

[Pacopete4]

Don't blow a gasket, its just a joke. From the internet postings and call-in radio yesterday, its obvious that the Ultimate Favre Fans are going to get excited every time the Packers lose, and claim that this is just the sort of game where the Packers would have won with Favre at the helm. We saw some of this in packerrats.

I think we should be ready to laugh.

Sunday was just the type of game where Favre would have tried to force things in the 3rd/4th quarters, would have ended up with 3-4 picks, and we'd be sitting in here scratching our heads over how he could make such a boneheaded throw.

Pacopete would blame the receivers for running the wrong routes, Woody would blame MM for the playcalling, and Merlin would blame TT for assembling such a shitty team.

weird thing is we would have got embarrassed at home with both styles of play from the qb... our team just is not that good.. it will show the difference b/t brett and arod by seasons end

[arcilite]

Re: Would the Jets have been better off with Rodgers?

I think last night's game was just the sort of game where the Jets could have used a QB like Aaron Rodgers. Favre threw the game away with two interceptions, and several near pickoffs. In a tight game like that, its seems like a more mobile and sure-handed QB like Rodgers could be more effective.

Your thoughts?

Threw the game away you say?


lets see - put 29 points on the board, would of been 30+ if no 2 pointers were tried.

How many points did AR put on the board? hmm?

Besides, neither int was blaringly favre's fault. One was a guy doing a out in a one on one situation,a nd cromartie came over the top and scooped it in the air with one hand and grabbed it while laying on the reciver's back. That is favre's fault how?

Then, the other. No one knows who is to blame, cept the WR and the QB. It was a coverage read play, and favre threw it to the outside and deep, the wr came short and to the inside. It was a communication error. Of course, the media will side with favre was right, but the truth is no one knows. Fact remains, the guy who picked that ball off would not have if the WR would of went to where apparently favre thought he was going.

Anyways, thats niether here nor there. So, last night's game was a perfect example where the jets could of used AR huh? Really? No turnovers, but no TD's? Against the chargers? You think your going to beat the chargers WITHOUT putting points on the board? Wow.

someone took this thread too serious

anyways, most of the jets points were in garbage time

[Joemailman]

Re: Would the Jets have been better off with Rodgers?

Threw the game away you say?


lets see - put 29 points on the board, would of been 30+ if no 2 pointers were tried.

I think Favre played pretty well, I was just joking. Or being an asshole. Or pretending to be an asshole. However you want to look at it.

RG must like you better than Tyrone. He hasn't moved this thread.

[Harlan Huckleby]

what's not to like? to know me is to love me.

[mraynrand]

[Bretsky]

stupid

[ThunderDan]

Re: Would the Jets have been better off with Rodgers?

I think last night's game was just the sort of game where the Jets could have used a QB like Aaron Rodgers. Favre threw the game away with two interceptions, and several near pickoffs. In a tight game like that, its seems like a more mobile and sure-handed QB like Rodgers could be more effective.

Your thoughts?

Threw the game away you say?


lets see - put 29 points on the board, would of been 30+ if no 2 pointers were tried.

How many points did AR put on the board? hmm?

Besides, neither int was blaringly favre's fault. One was a guy doing a out in a one on one situation,a nd cromartie came over the top and scooped it in the air with one hand and grabbed it while laying on the reciver's back. That is favre's fault how?

Then, the other. No one knows who is to blame, cept the WR and the QB. It was a coverage read play, and favre threw it to the outside and deep, the wr came short and to the inside. It was a communication error. Of course, the media will side with favre was right, but the truth is no one knows. Fact remains, the guy who picked that ball off would not have if the WR would of went to where apparently favre thought he was going.

Anyways, thats niether here nor there. So, last night's game was a perfect example where the jets could of used AR huh? Really? No turnovers, but no TD's? Against the chargers? You think your going to beat the chargers WITHOUT putting points on the board? Wow.

Did you watch the same game I did?

First of all the D scored 7 for The Jets and The Jets ST scored 7. Favre was accountible for 17 points.

As for Brett's 2nd INT during the press conference he admitted the throw was his fault. On top of that he said the coaches sat him down after the play and showed Brett the stills from the play. His TE was wide open down the middle for a TD if he wasn't so locked into the WR. Read Favre's post game interview if you don't believe me.

[MadtownPacker]

what's not to like? to know me is to love me.

My itchy trigger finger syndrome has been acting up today.

So Harlot, are you going to the posters get together? I sure would like to get to meet the great man behind the curtain.