Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TRULY sad news from Tampa

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

    That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

    That is pretty stupid.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by KYPack
      The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

      That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

      That is pretty stupid.
      Please tell me you're kidding.
      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by KYPack
        The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

        That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

        That is pretty stupid.
        Or they let the punter handle both duties. Not hard.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          Originally posted by KYPack
          The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

          That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

          That is pretty stupid.
          Or they let the punter handle both duties. Not hard.
          You aren't serious, are you CPK? Few punters can kick XP's and FG's.

          Zig, this from the Orlando Sentinel.

          Local guys can be crazy but this sounds accurate...

          Sometimes, there's got to be a loophole ... NFL could use some common sense on this issue



          "I know the NFL is "The King" and all that, but sometimes compassion is needed from the throne.

          Given the circumstances surrounding the death of Bucs placekicker Matt Bryant's infant son -- Matthew Tryson Bryant did not wake up Wednesday morning -- I sent an email off to NFL Senior Vice President of Public Relations Greg Aiello asking if there were precedents, from either side, that addressed a roster exemption for a player confronted by an unexpected tragedy during the season.

          This was Aiello's response:

          Chris: Every club has an eight-player inactive list for each game.

          Obviously, I knew the eight-man inactive rules for each game.

          But this is a little different.

          This instances is not like a linebacker or wide receiver or offensive linemen who's injured and is de-activated for a game with a sprained ankle or strained hamstring. Teams carry one kicker. That means, if Bryant needs the weekend to mourn the loss of his son, the Bucs -- due to these unusual circumstances (Bryant, remember, is not injured) -- will have to sign a kicker, which means they'll have to cut a player in order to get that kicker on the roster.

          That means that player, who has made the Bucs roster, could be scooped up by any of the 31 other teams and leave Tampa Bay -- through no fault of its own -- either to promote a lesser player from the practice squad or go find one.

          Maybe it's me, but something just seems wrong about it. Afterall, a player suspended for a domestic violence incident or DUI arrest, for example, gets a roster exemption on the Reserve/Suspended list.
          Why not a player who has lost a child?

          It goes back to what Jon Gruden said a couple weeks ago in the aftermath of an official's inadvertantly blown whistle -- and blown call -- that cost the San Diego Chargers a crushing, last-second loss to rival Denver.

          "Sometimes," Gruden said, "I think just doing what's right -- and correcting what's wrong -- is what we're after."

          This is one of things that doesn't seem right. "

          This guy should get a week to grieve and the Bucs should be able to use a kicker for a week.

          Comment


          • #20
            This from reports....

            " Matt Bryant has been away from the team all week after the discovery Wednesday morning that his 3-months-old son had died overnight. The funeral is today in Tampa. Expectations are that he will kick Sunday. "

            If he wants to, fine.

            If he HAS to, man that's cold blooded.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by KYPack
              This guy should get a week to grieve and the Bucs should be able to use a kicker for a week.
              Look, I don't know the work laws in the USA, but I tell ya, I couldn't get over this type of loss in a week.

              I guess we Aussie/Europeans have a lot t learn.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by KYPack
                The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

                That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

                That is pretty stupid.
                I would hope the bucs and bryant can work out an agreement..something like releasing him for week to replace him with a mutual promise to resign him immediately after the game. I know the real world rarely works in such common sense ways, but if I'm bryant I spend the time with my wife and whatever the team decides it decides...not his first concern atm.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by bobblehead
                  Originally posted by KYPack
                  The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

                  That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

                  That is pretty stupid.
                  I would hope the bucs and bryant can work out an agreement..something like releasing him for week to replace him with a mutual promise to resign him immediately after the game. I know the real world rarely works in such common sense ways, but if I'm bryant I spend the time with my wife and whatever the team decides it decides...not his first concern atm.
                  This is where Pete Rozelle was a giant and Roger Goodell is a dwarf. Under Goodell's watch, PR disasters happen routinely. Rozelle would have made a PR masterstroke out of a tragedy. Goodell makes the NFL look like Simon Legree.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Tarlam!
                    Originally posted by KYPack
                    This guy should get a week to grieve and the Bucs should be able to use a kicker for a week.
                    Look, I don't know the work laws in the USA, but I tell ya, I couldn't get over this type of loss in a week.

                    I guess we Aussie/Europeans have a lot t learn.

                    First, my thoughts goes to the Bryant family.

                    Tarlam, I hope/believe it's not an Aussie/Europeans vs US thing but I'm with you 100%.
                    PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
                    PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
                    PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
                    Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
                    Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
                    PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by KYPack
                      Originally posted by cpk1994
                      Originally posted by KYPack
                      The big hearted NFL office will help here. No, maybe it won't. Bryant may HAVE to play. The NFL doesn't give a roster exemption for bereavement. if the Bucs need a kicker to sub for Bryant, they have to cut a player, and add a kicker in that spot.

                      That puts Bryant in a tough situation.

                      That is pretty stupid.
                      Or they let the punter handle both duties. Not hard.
                      You aren't serious, are you CPK? Few punters can kick XP's and FG's.

                      Zig, this from the Orlando Sentinel.

                      Local guys can be crazy but this sounds accurate...

                      Sometimes, there's got to be a loophole ... NFL could use some common sense on this issue



                      "I know the NFL is "The King" and all that, but sometimes compassion is needed from the throne.

                      Given the circumstances surrounding the death of Bucs placekicker Matt Bryant's infant son -- Matthew Tryson Bryant did not wake up Wednesday morning -- I sent an email off to NFL Senior Vice President of Public Relations Greg Aiello asking if there were precedents, from either side, that addressed a roster exemption for a player confronted by an unexpected tragedy during the season.

                      This was Aiello's response:

                      Chris: Every club has an eight-player inactive list for each game.

                      Obviously, I knew the eight-man inactive rules for each game.

                      But this is a little different.

                      This instances is not like a linebacker or wide receiver or offensive linemen who's injured and is de-activated for a game with a sprained ankle or strained hamstring. Teams carry one kicker. That means, if Bryant needs the weekend to mourn the loss of his son, the Bucs -- due to these unusual circumstances (Bryant, remember, is not injured) -- will have to sign a kicker, which means they'll have to cut a player in order to get that kicker on the roster.

                      That means that player, who has made the Bucs roster, could be scooped up by any of the 31 other teams and leave Tampa Bay -- through no fault of its own -- either to promote a lesser player from the practice squad or go find one.

                      Maybe it's me, but something just seems wrong about it. Afterall, a player suspended for a domestic violence incident or DUI arrest, for example, gets a roster exemption on the Reserve/Suspended list.
                      Why not a player who has lost a child?

                      It goes back to what Jon Gruden said a couple weeks ago in the aftermath of an official's inadvertantly blown whistle -- and blown call -- that cost the San Diego Chargers a crushing, last-second loss to rival Denver.

                      "Sometimes," Gruden said, "I think just doing what's right -- and correcting what's wrong -- is what we're after."

                      This is one of things that doesn't seem right. "

                      This guy should get a week to grieve and the Bucs should be able to use a kicker for a week.
                      Yes Im serious. Craig Hentrich did it. It has been done before.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by cpk1994
                        ]Yes Im serious. Craig Hentrich did it. It has been done before.
                        Well, ya shouldn't have been serious. There are very few punters that can do both gigs.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by KYPack
                          Originally posted by cpk1994
                          ]Yes Im serious. Craig Hentrich did it. It has been done before.
                          Well, ya shouldn't have been serious. There are very few punters that can do both gigs.
                          maybe its rare, but it happens. i seem to recall (maybe i'm wrong) situations in the past where the punter handled the kickoffs due to his leg strength, while the kicker only placekicked
                          Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by falco
                            Originally posted by KYPack
                            Originally posted by cpk1994
                            ]Yes Im serious. Craig Hentrich did it. It has been done before.
                            Well, ya shouldn't have been serious. There are very few punters that can do both gigs.
                            maybe its rare, but it happens. i seem to recall (maybe i'm wrong) situations in the past where the punter handled the kickoffs due to his leg strength, while the kicker only placekicked
                            I thought you guys were joking. Hentrich had the very unique ability to punt and place kick. There might be one other guy in the league with dual ability. You don't just tell your punter, "hey, handle both gigs Sunday". There are very few punters who could kick it past the line. it's two very different skills.

                            Why some teams use TWO punters on the roster at the same time.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X