NFL's Best Receivers

[Tarlam!]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d80b23f5e&template=with-video&confirm=true

On this link, Rats will find the preview video for Cards vs Jets.

During the video, the talk is about Kurt Warner's greatness and the fact that he has the "best receiver corps in the league".

I'm sorry, but what???

Driver, Jennings, Jones, Martin and Nelson combine for the best receiver corps in the league. Not Boldwin/Fitzgerald.

I'm getting really pissed that our team is being so underrated.

[Pugger]

That's no surprise. The national media completely ignore us now that Brett is in NJ. I'm thinking in the future when they see how good OUR receiving corps is they'll begin to notice them now that the national spot light is out east.

[falco]

i think i agree with you tarlam, buts its not like cardinals receivers are crap... i would argue that boldin + fitzgerald > drivers + jennings, but not by much. i think we are much more deep than them though.

[Fred's Slacks]

I think Bolden-Fitz probably is the best 1-2 tandem. I agree that 1-5 GB is the best.

[bobblehead]

i think i agree with you tarlam, buts its not like cardinals receivers are crap... i would argue that boldin + fitzgerald > drivers + jennings, but not by much. i think we are much more deep than them though.

I think they are much better...bigger stronger faster with simiilar ball skillz. Hard to point out a similar twosome in NFL HISTORY much less today. Only chandler/joiner come to mind. Oh yea...they are both in their prime.

[GBRulz]

It doesn't really matter to me if we are being underrated. It seemed to work in the Giants favor last year.

I would agree that GB has the best depth at WR, although not necessarily the top 1 and 2.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

The level of homerism is getting a bit ridiculous.

[Tarlam!]

The level of homerism is getting a bit ridiculous.

Make an argument. Establish a position, or contradict one with some grey matter.

Instead, you just make insults without any foundation. Exactly why you're so loved around these parts. Just like slinging shit, right? Fucking idiot.

.

[retailguy]

Right now today, Jennings is running, playing, and maintaing statistics with the "top" in the league. But, only for 4 weeks. If he's still doing it, game 4 of next season, yep, tops in the league. Driver, to this point is the forgotten man in the offense. Not in the same league as either Boldin or Fitzgerald.

GB has a great receiving corps, homerism or not. The best? Maybe, maybe not, but hey, they're good enough to win with!

[BobDobbs]

We love our receivers, but they are not the best in the league. Statistically Arizona has a clear advantage. They've got two of the top five guys in the league and not one like us. In Fact they're third receiver Steve Breaston has nearly comparable numbers to Donald Driver. They also have the 4th rated passing offense compared to our tenth.

All this can change over the year, but right now most objective observers would trade our guys for they're guys. I've heard the logic that if you look at us 1-5 we are the best. But who cares? It's like saying you have the best backup catcher. Its a good thing, but is it a game changer?

I think it is more about a teams top three, they are getting the lions share of the catches. And then game changing plays. We're good we might get better, but we're not the best.

[MOBB DEEP]

i think i agree with you tarlam, buts its not like cardinals receivers are crap... i would argue that boldin + fitzgerald > drivers + jennings, but not by much. i think we are much more deep than them though.

I think they are much better...bigger stronger faster with simiilar ball skillz. Hard to point out a similar twosome in NFL HISTORY much less today. Only chandler/joiner come to mind. Oh yea...they are both in their prime.

moss/carter, rice/taylor, duper (my frat bro)/ clayton, freeman/brooks to name a few

[MOBB DEEP]

jennings is flat out a stud

[MOBB DEEP]

The level of homerism is getting a bit ridiculous.

Make an argument. Establish a position, or contradict one with some grey matter.

Instead, you just make insults without any foundation. Exactly why you're so loved around these parts. Just like slinging shit, right? Fucking idiot.

.

DAYUM...jugular

[hoosier]

i think i agree with you tarlam, buts its not like cardinals receivers are crap... i would argue that boldin + fitzgerald > drivers + jennings, but not by much. i think we are much more deep than them though.

I think they are much better...bigger stronger faster with simiilar ball skillz. Hard to point out a similar twosome in NFL HISTORY much less today. Only chandler/joiner come to mind. Oh yea...they are both in their prime.

moss/carter, rice/taylor, duper (my frat bro)/ clayton, freeman/brooks to name a few

A few more: Stallworth/Swann, Marvin/Reggie Wayne, Isaac Bruce/Tory Holt, Hirsch/Fears.

[Partial]

I really like us 5 deep, but think we're only top 5 in top 2. I'd take TO and Creyton over ours. I'd take Moss and Welker over ours. I'd take Fitz and Bolden over ours.

The big guys like Moss, TO and Fitz bring an element to an offense that keeps a defense on its toes. We don't have that sort of big, fast guy.