With A-Rod hurt and obviously injury prone and with 2 rookie QB's backing him up, part of me wants them to sign a veteran backup and part of me wants to keep both rookies. Flynn and Brohm both look like they may have bright NFL futures and signing a vet would mean we'd lose one, but it sucks seeing Flynn struggle behind Rodgers.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What should the Packers do?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by RastakI vote we go with Tex. He indicated Flynn is better than anybody available.
I may be the only one....but DAMN I wanna see Brohm play. I think he's a hell of a lot better QB than Flynn...despite what we saw in the preseason.
Comment
-
I know what you mean...but you never know what the hell TT is gonna do.Originally posted by Pacopete4if we traded for a vet like Bulger, it would be absolutely hilarious... trading Favre and then trading for Bulger all in one season... it has my laughing already
Comment
-
Interesting. I like it.Originally posted by PuggerWhat free agents are out there?
I'd keep both Flynn and Brohm and add a vet QB. I'd cut the long snapper and have Wells do it. I just don't understand why teams 'waste' a roster spot there.
Comment
-
It's not an appealing option either, but there's nothing stopping them from carrying four QB's, at least for the time being.
It's really a question of just how good they think these rookies are going to be. Do they really have starting potential? You'd like to think Brohm does, given his draft position, so what about Flynn?
If Rodgers is out more than one or two games, then it's silly to risk the season to protect these guys if they're nothing more than the next Ty Detmer.
If they think Flynn is a potential starter down the road then they need to carry four QB's, because these guys aren't ready right now.#14
Comment

Comment