Rodgers "game-time decision"

[Kyle.McCarroll]

MM isn't going to want to take chances with his franchise QB. They just don't want to tip their hand.

Aaron is probably going to have to beg MM to let him play Sunday.

[Rastak]

MM isn't going to want to take chances with his franchise QB. They just don't want to tip their hand.

Aaron is probably going to have to beg MM to let him play Sunday.

We'll see what happens but I am expecting to see him sunday.

[Scott Campbell]

MM isn't going to want to take chances with his franchise QB. They just don't want to tip their hand.

Aaron is probably going to have to beg MM to let him play Sunday.

We'll see what happens but I am expecting to see him sunday.

Me too!

[The Gunshooter]

My guess is they already know one way or another. They're dragging it out to make the Falcons waste some time watching film on both QB's (what little there is) and prepare for both.

The back-ups suck so bad there is no need to prepare for them.

[mraynrand]

I'm certain he'll play well - just so long as they use a tennis ball instead of a football.

[BallHawk]

There is a concern for injury but if we're talking playing ability.....Aaron's 50% is better than Flynn's 100%.

[Rastak]

MM isn't going to want to take chances with his franchise QB. They just don't want to tip their hand.

Aaron is probably going to have to beg MM to let him play Sunday.

We'll see what happens but I am expecting to see him sunday.

Me too!

Man you turned into an ugly fuck scott......

[Scott Campbell]

Man you turned into an ugly fuck scott......

Pot meet kettle.

[Partial]

It's probably not. But, Favre will play. Iron man reputation is earned. Favre has earned it.

P, you're not old enough to know what time does to the human body. 39 year old Brett is not going to be as durable as the 29 year old version of Brett.

No doubt about it. I don't expect it to. I was merely saying it is what it is until Rodgers proves otherwise. Favre doesn't have anything to prove about his durability. That's always what he'll be best known for.

Even now I'd take Favre over Rodgers from a pure, durability standpoint. If he didn't get hurt at 36, 37, 38 or ever, why would he suddenly start at 39. I'm sure he'll be fine.

[PackerTimer]

It's probably not. But, Favre will play. Iron man reputation is earned. Favre has earned it.

P, you're not old enough to know what time does to the human body. 39 year old Brett is not going to be as durable as the 29 year old version of Brett.

No doubt about it. I don't expect it to. I was merely saying it is what it is until Rodgers proves otherwise. Favre doesn't have anything to prove about his durability. That's always what he'll be best known for.

Even now I'd take Favre over Rodgers from a pure, durability standpoint. If he didn't get hurt at 36, 37, 38 or ever, why would he suddenly start at 39. I'm sure he'll be fine.

I totally agree with you. Yes, Rodgers has been hurt. I've heard that he would have played through the injury last year had they needed him. So while he was hurt, is that really a big deal? Guys get hurt. The most durable player in NFL history, Brett Favre, has been hurt in his career but he is a tough SOB and he's played through it. If Rodgers can do that, he'll earn a lot of respect. I don't expect Rodgers to not get hurt but if it's something he can play with he's gotta play. That's what a leader does.

[Zool]

I totally agree with you. Yes, Rodgers has been hurt. I've heard that he would have played through the injury last year had they needed him. So while he was hurt, is that really a big deal? Guys get hurt. The most durable player in NFL history, Brett Favre, has been hurt in his career but he is a tough SOB and he's played through it. If Rodgers can do that, he'll earn a lot of respect. I don't expect Rodgers to not get hurt but if it's something he can play with he's gotta play. That's what a leader does.

QFT. Every QB not named Favre gets hurt. The guy is supernatural in his abililty to escape major injury and play through pain. Comparing Rodgers to him is about as fair as expecting Rodgers to put up 400+ TD's in his career.

[Fritz]

Back when I was a kid a quarterback played even if his throwing arm had been amputated and his left femur was shattered.

Get in there, Rodgers. Quit acting like a baby.

[retailguy]

Back when I was a kid a quarterback played even if his throwing arm had been amputated and his left femur was shattered.

Brett?...... Is that you?..... :P

[retailguy]

I totally agree with you. Yes, Rodgers has been hurt. I've heard that he would have played through the injury last year had they needed him. So while he was hurt, is that really a big deal? Guys get hurt. The most durable player in NFL history, Brett Favre, has been hurt in his career but he is a tough SOB and he's played through it. If Rodgers can do that, he'll earn a lot of respect. I don't expect Rodgers to not get hurt but if it's something he can play with he's gotta play. That's what a leader does.

QFT. Every QB not named Favre gets hurt. The guy is supernatural in his abililty to escape major injury and play through pain. Comparing Rodgers to him is about as fair as expecting Rodgers to put up 400+ TD's in his career.

I expect 450 td's in half the time it took Favre.

[retailguy]

I think he'll play. Just a gut feeling, but I think he plays, and if the game gets out of hand either way, he'll come out.