I think this O line is a disaster, and its long overdue for a couple of moves.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Positives/Negatives
Collapse
X
-
It would be between them and the Chiefs, although the Rams are nothing to write home about, unless it's a dysfunctional home.Originally posted by JustinHarrellSadly I think Chicago is the class of the north. They have the best line play. They have the best defense and special teams. Their QB is not good, but he's doing enough.
The Packers and Vikings are equal IMO. They'll both finish about 7-9. The Lions are the worst team in the NFL."Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Comment
-
That's a very short sighted statement with one example.Originally posted by cpk1994The second half of your statement is BS. You can have a good OL without breaking the bank. As a counter point the Vikings have spent $100 million on their OL. Still no playoff appearnances and the offense still blows. What you spend has no bearing on how good your line is.Originally posted by Harlan Hucklebyinjuries and conservative spending by TTOriginally posted by cpk1994Injuries have killed the DL. THe OL short yardage problem is nothing new. That has been going on for years no matter who is on the line or who the coach is.
Dallas' line is built up from... you guessed it.. free agency! Are you honestly telling me that our line wouldn't be solidified right now with Faneca, a player who has been to the pro bowl 6 years in a row?!?
Comment
-
The injuries and spending referred to the Packer D-line.Originally posted by cpk1994The second half of your statement is BS. You can have a good OL without breaking the bank. As a counter point the Vikings have spent $100 million on their OL. Still no playoff appearnances and the offense still blows. What you spend has no bearing on how good your line is.Originally posted by Harlan Hucklebyinjuries and conservative spending by TTOriginally posted by cpk1994Injuries have killed the DL. THe OL short yardage problem is nothing new. That has been going on for years no matter who is on the line or who the coach is.
But since you are talking O-line, your theory that "what you spend has no bearing on how good your line is" is astonishing. Sounds like Jerry Jones wasted a lot of money assembling that league-best offensive line, he could have gotten the same thing for nothing by simply becoming a believer in the cpk system.
Wait a sec, this all sounds familar, do you have a late night infomercial?
Comment
-
The problem is: this year I've been moderately surprised by the interior OL. It seems like Clifton and Tauscher have been the weak links. I didn't expect that this year. We did much better yesterday when Barbre went to LG and Colledge to LT. It helped not to have any Clifton penalties in the second half. Tauscher has whiffed on his share of blocks.Originally posted by Scott CampbellI think this O line is a disaster, and its long overdue for a couple of moves."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Re: Positives/Negatives
He is our best return guy. He is the 4th string CB. He isn't getting stupid penalties. He always seems to be right with his man. I don't recall him giving up any big plays or having mental errors. I remember him breaking up a pass or two.Originally posted by JustinHarrellWill Blackmon has still never made one play on defense other than tackling a reciever after he gives up an easy catch. He is a zero. Worst player on the field.
If he is the worst player on the field, you must be pretty happy with the quality of players this team.
Comment
-
Also their pass protection. That is on the OL. Maybe it wasn't a completely good ciounter point, but the fact remains that you don't have to break the bank to have a good OL and Harlans post about TT conservative spending on the line being a problem is still BS.Originally posted by RastakOriginally posted by cpk1994The second half of your statement is BS. You can have a good OL without breaking the bank. As a counter point the Vikings have spent $100 million on their OL. Still no playoff appearnances and the offense still blows. What you spend has no bearing on how good your line is.Originally posted by Harlan Hucklebyinjuries and conservative spending by TTOriginally posted by cpk1994Injuries have killed the DL. THe OL short yardage problem is nothing new. That has been going on for years no matter who is on the line or who the coach is.
Dude, apples meet oranges. They spent and they led the league in rushing. If you are paying any attention at all you'd realize their issues are QB and WR....but mainly coaching staff.
Comment
-
Well, how about that great line the Packers had under Mike Sherman? They didn't spend much on that line now did they. As I recall Rivera and Wahle left for their big paydays and the rest got their paydays after a couple of years showing that they were a good line.Originally posted by Harlan HucklebyThe injuries and spending referred to the Packer D-line.Originally posted by cpk1994The second half of your statement is BS. You can have a good OL without breaking the bank. As a counter point the Vikings have spent $100 million on their OL. Still no playoff appearnances and the offense still blows. What you spend has no bearing on how good your line is.Originally posted by Harlan Hucklebyinjuries and conservative spending by TTOriginally posted by cpk1994Injuries have killed the DL. THe OL short yardage problem is nothing new. That has been going on for years no matter who is on the line or who the coach is.
But since you are talking O-line, your theory that "what you spend has no bearing on how good your line is" is astonishing. Sounds like Jerry Jones wasted a lot of money assembling that league-best offensive line, he could have gotten the same thing for nothing by simply becoming a believer in the cpk system.
Wait a sec, this all sounds familar, do you have a late night infomercial?
Comment
-
I agree. The thinking was our guard play was going to start to catch up to the tackle play. We didn't foresee the tackle play decline. Wells has been crap too. Tausch has been okay but not as good as last year. I hope Clifton's problem is injury related. It would be nice to get him back to the level he played at last year. That alone would go a long way to fixing our OLine problem.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersThe problem is: this year I've been moderately surprised by the interior OL. It seems like Clifton and Tauscher have been the weak links. I didn't expect that this year. We did much better yesterday when Barbre went to LG and Colledge to LT. It helped not to have any Clifton penalties in the second half. Tauscher has whiffed on his share of blocks.Originally posted by Scott CampbellI think this O line is a disaster, and its long overdue for a couple of moves.Fred's Slacks is a Winner!
Comment
-
I would like them to play Spitz at center and Sitton at guard for the rest of the season once healthy. It's time we try to get more powerful up front. At it looks now, we're not going anywhere anyway this year, so might as well get some experience with those guys so we can hit the ground running next year.
Comment


Comment