Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official "The Sky is NOT Falling" Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Zool
    Well ok, watching Soup pitch in the playoffs is actually worse, but not by much.
    I'd call it even. Maybe watching Suppan pitch to Pat Burrell would be worse.
    "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by BallHawk
      Originally posted by Zool
      Well ok, watching Soup pitch in the playoffs is actually worse, but not by much.
      I'd call it even. Maybe watching Suppan pitch to Pat Burrell would be worse.

      its like he was pitching BP to those guys...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BallHawk
        Originally posted by Zool
        Well ok, watching Soup pitch in the playoffs is actually worse, but not by much.
        I'd call it even. Maybe watching Suppan pitch to Pat Burrell would be worse.
        WIth the Brewers batting .113 for the series, did it really matter how well Suppan pitched?

        Comment


        • #34
          I hate to say it, but I think the guy who is going to have to hold the sky up is Justin Harrell.

          They really, really need him to come back and play at a starter level to recharge that defense.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Official "The Sky is NOT Falling" Thread

            Originally posted by cpk1994
            The bears are getting pretty close to establishing themselvs in our division as the best... they've put a whooopin on Det, we didnt... and they took down the colts and beat the mighty eagles...
            I could have sworn the Packers beat the lions by over 20 and dominated for almost 3 quarters. But comparing two teams using a third is assinine anyway.[/quote]

            Dominated? They dominated for a half. Got up 24 - 0. Then the offense stopped getting first downs and controlling the clock, forcing the defense on the field for most of the second half sucking wind. Next thing you know, we're down 26-24. Give me a break dude. The offense put on a very poor showing that day. I for one am getting tired of McCarthy's refusal to finish the job when the sword is to the proverbial throat of our opposition.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              I hate to say it, but I think the guy who is going to have to hold the sky up is Justin Harrell.

              They really, really need him to come back and play at a starter level to recharge that defense.
              He also needs to prove he was worth a #1 draft pick.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                I hate to say it, but I think the guy who is going to have to hold the sky up is Justin Harrell.

                They really, really need him to come back and play at a starter level to recharge that defense.
                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                  the transitive property doesn't work in sports. Only idiots use that to bolster their arguments.
                  Why? As someone who has taken countless logic classes I am of the belief that it certainly has some validity in proving that an argument is complete and it is a very useful tool.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Official "The Sky is NOT Falling" Thread

                    Originally posted by cpk1994
                    Originally posted by GrnBay007
                    Originally posted by cpk1994

                    They haven't established anything until they beat the Packers head to head.
                    This Packer team is not as good as last year. The Bears seemed to have improved and beat us 2x last year. But then again you never know, that's why they play the games.
                    That is exactly my point. The Packers are the team to beat until someone knocks them off thier throne.
                    Team to beat? They aren't even going to make the playoffs. They can't hold a candle to:

                    Giants
                    Cowboys
                    Eagles
                    Redskins
                    Saints
                    Bears
                    Cardinals

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Official "The Sky is NOT Falling" Thread

                      Originally posted by Partial
                      Originally posted by cpk1994
                      The bears are getting pretty close to establishing themselvs in our division as the best... they've put a whooopin on Det, we didnt... and they took down the colts and beat the mighty eagles...
                      I could have sworn the Packers beat the lions by over 20 and dominated for almost 3 quarters. But comparing two teams using a third is assinine anyway.
                      Dominated? They dominated for a half. Got up 24 - 0. Then the offense stopped getting first downs and controlling the clock, forcing the defense on the field for most of the second half sucking wind. Next thing you know, we're down 26-24. Give me a break dude. The offense put on a very poor showing that day. I for one am getting tired of McCarthy's refusal to finish the job when the sword is to the proverbial throat of our opposition.[/quote]

                      Poor showing that day my ass. Yes they got down 26-24 but A Rod went right back out and stepped on the gas got them a FG and a TD before the D put it away. That was not a poor showing. That is just ignorant

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Official "The Sky is NOT Falling" Thread

                        Originally posted by cpk1994
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        Originally posted by cpk1994
                        The bears are getting pretty close to establishing themselvs in our division as the best... they've put a whooopin on Det, we didnt... and they took down the colts and beat the mighty eagles...
                        I could have sworn the Packers beat the lions by over 20 and dominated for almost 3 quarters. But comparing two teams using a third is assinine anyway.
                        Dominated? They dominated for a half. Got up 24 - 0. Then the offense stopped getting first downs and controlling the clock, forcing the defense on the field for most of the second half sucking wind. Next thing you know, we're down 26-24. Give me a break dude. The offense put on a very poor showing that day. I for one am getting tired of McCarthy's refusal to finish the job when the sword is to the proverbial throat of our opposition.
                        Poor showing that day my ass. Yes they got down 26-24 but A Rod went right back out and stepped on the gas got them a FG and a TD before the D put it away. That was not a poor showing. That is just ignorant [/quote]

                        How can you even argue that? So not moving the ball at all in the second half is acceptable? We're not going to be so lucky week in and week out. We will be a 3-13 team if we continue to play well for half a game.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Partial
                          As someone who has taken countless logic classes........


                          So were they different classes, or the same one over and over again?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                            Originally posted by Partial
                            As someone who has taken countless logic classes........


                            So were they different classes, or the same one over and over again?
                            Many, many logic classes.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              This team is in a lot of trouble. I thought Jenkins might have been their best defensive player. That loss is huge, especially because he was so versatile. Bigby out. Harris out. Rouse out. Too many outies, and not enough innies.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                                This team is in a lot of trouble. I thought Jenkins might have been their best defensive player. That loss is huge, especially because he was so versatile. Bigby out. Harris out. Rouse out. Too many outies, and not enough innies.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X