Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

[mraynrand]

Re: Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

[quote:c426e828b8="Pacopete4"][quote:c426e828b8="packerbacker1234"]Yes, he played well. He also had a very boneheaded int.

Raise of hands - even if hurt, had Favre been our QB and threw that int, how many people would solely blaim this game on #4?

I am sure many, because that has been happening now for 8 seasons with him. Suddenly, because AR is hurt, he gets no blaim for the int? It was a crucial mistake in a big situation. Say what you will, everyone screwed up,a nd certaintly it should not come down to that int... but we all know if it was Favre instead it would be his head being blamed.

Just saying, AR has to own up mistakes too. It wasn't a overall bad game, but a crucial mistake cost us points. We lost by three. Seems to me those points were crucial.

let me tell ya.. I'd be the first to back ya up here cuz the whole situation stinks.. and ur right, there are tons on these boards who blamed everything on Brett when it was going bad and then sucked his dick when he was playing lights out... but the pick he threw was him trying his best to get us outta the gutter... he tried to fit a ball in on 3rd and long knowing our punter hits em about 30 yards and the time was runnin out in the game... i have no problem with it.. hindsight is always 20/20

You would know about sucking FAvre's dick.

I would not have blamed this on Brett. The INT? yes. The game no.

My thoughts exactly. Wasn't favre blamed solely for that loss to philly in the playoffs, even though he played a really solid game?

Same situation my friend. In terms of importance to the game when the int happened, that is.

I never blamed Favre solely for that loss. The only losses I have blamed Favre for was the 5 INT game against Cincinatti when Favre ruined a great defensive effort, and the 6 INT game against St. Louis. Other than that I blame Favre for his INts no the games.

Then your one of the few reasonable people that realize that favre alone rarely can win a game, and he alone rarely is responsible for losing a game. Many other factors come into play.

Although, Favre's last game with the jets... i must say he layed down a good beatdown pretty much on his own. The run game stillw asn't working, the defense gave up 30+ points, and he just winged TD after TD.

Was insane. Still, those are very rare moments. I apologize then, but a lot of other people blame favre not just for the int, but for the game.

Different situations. Favre didn't need to take a risk like that, as it was 2nd down, they were tied, first possession of overtime, and the defense unable to stop the run.

Rodgers was faced with a 3rd and 20 because of a backbreaking penalty, with the Packers behind and needing a score.

Both were bad; Favre's was a lot worse. They aren't even comparable.

However, the correct parallel situation is when Favre threw the interception against Dallas in the 1995 NFC Championship. Circumstances were similar to this game, and I don't blame Favre for that one at all.

I wouldn't have blamed him

I would have.

Riiiight. [/quote:c426e828b8]

Liar![/quote:c426e828b8]

Sez you!

[mraynrand]

Re: Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

[quote:4cdf7f099d="cpk1994"][quote:4cdf7f099d="Pacopete4"][quote:4cdf7f099d="packerbacker1234"]Yes, he played well. He also had a very boneheaded int.

Raise of hands - even if hurt, had Favre been our QB and threw that int, how many people would solely blaim this game on #4?

I am sure many, because that has been happening now for 8 seasons with him. Suddenly, because AR is hurt, he gets no blaim for the int? It was a crucial mistake in a big situation. Say what you will, everyone screwed up,a nd certaintly it should not come down to that int... but we all know if it was Favre instead it would be his head being blamed.

Just saying, AR has to own up mistakes too. It wasn't a overall bad game, but a crucial mistake cost us points. We lost by three. Seems to me those points were crucial.

let me tell ya.. I'd be the first to back ya up here cuz the whole situation stinks.. and ur right, there are tons on these boards who blamed everything on Brett when it was going bad and then sucked his dick when he was playing lights out... but the pick he threw was him trying his best to get us outta the gutter... he tried to fit a ball in on 3rd and long knowing our punter hits em about 30 yards and the time was runnin out in the game... i have no problem with it.. hindsight is always 20/20

You would know about sucking FAvre's dick.

I would not have blamed this on Brett. The INT? yes. The game no.

My thoughts exactly. Wasn't favre blamed solely for that loss to philly in the playoffs, even though he played a really solid game?

Same situation my friend. In terms of importance to the game when the int happened, that is.

I never blamed Favre solely for that loss. The only losses I have blamed Favre for was the 5 INT game against Cincinatti when Favre ruined a great defensive effort, and the 6 INT game against St. Louis. Other than that I blame Favre for his INts no the games.

Then your one of the few reasonable people that realize that favre alone rarely can win a game, and he alone rarely is responsible for losing a game. Many other factors come into play.

Although, Favre's last game with the jets... i must say he layed down a good beatdown pretty much on his own. The run game stillw asn't working, the defense gave up 30+ points, and he just winged TD after TD.

Was insane. Still, those are very rare moments. I apologize then, but a lot of other people blame favre not just for the int, but for the game.

Different situations. Favre didn't need to take a risk like that, as it was 2nd down, they were tied, first possession of overtime, and the defense unable to stop the run.

Rodgers was faced with a 3rd and 20 because of a backbreaking penalty, with the Packers behind and needing a score.

Both were bad; Favre's was a lot worse. They aren't even comparable.

However, the correct parallel situation is when Favre threw the interception against Dallas in the 1995 NFC Championship. Circumstances were similar to this game, and I don't blame Favre for that one at all.

I wouldn't have blamed him

I would have.

Riiiight. [/quote:4cdf7f099d]

Liar![/quote:4cdf7f099d]

Sez you![/quote:4cdf7f099d]

Sos your old man!

[mraynrand]

Re: Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

[quote:2c076b51f4="cpk1994"][quote:2c076b51f4="Pacopete4"][quote:2c076b51f4="packerbacker1234"]Yes, he played well. He also had a very boneheaded int.

Raise of hands - even if hurt, had Favre been our QB and threw that int, how many people would solely blaim this game on #4?

I am sure many, because that has been happening now for 8 seasons with him. Suddenly, because AR is hurt, he gets no blaim for the int? It was a crucial mistake in a big situation. Say what you will, everyone screwed up,a nd certaintly it should not come down to that int... but we all know if it was Favre instead it would be his head being blamed.

Just saying, AR has to own up mistakes too. It wasn't a overall bad game, but a crucial mistake cost us points. We lost by three. Seems to me those points were crucial.

let me tell ya.. I'd be the first to back ya up here cuz the whole situation stinks.. and ur right, there are tons on these boards who blamed everything on Brett when it was going bad and then sucked his dick when he was playing lights out... but the pick he threw was him trying his best to get us outta the gutter... he tried to fit a ball in on 3rd and long knowing our punter hits em about 30 yards and the time was runnin out in the game... i have no problem with it.. hindsight is always 20/20

You would know about sucking FAvre's dick.

I would not have blamed this on Brett. The INT? yes. The game no.

My thoughts exactly. Wasn't favre blamed solely for that loss to philly in the playoffs, even though he played a really solid game?

Same situation my friend. In terms of importance to the game when the int happened, that is.

I never blamed Favre solely for that loss. The only losses I have blamed Favre for was the 5 INT game against Cincinatti when Favre ruined a great defensive effort, and the 6 INT game against St. Louis. Other than that I blame Favre for his INts no the games.

Then your one of the few reasonable people that realize that favre alone rarely can win a game, and he alone rarely is responsible for losing a game. Many other factors come into play.

Although, Favre's last game with the jets... i must say he layed down a good beatdown pretty much on his own. The run game stillw asn't working, the defense gave up 30+ points, and he just winged TD after TD.

Was insane. Still, those are very rare moments. I apologize then, but a lot of other people blame favre not just for the int, but for the game.

Different situations. Favre didn't need to take a risk like that, as it was 2nd down, they were tied, first possession of overtime, and the defense unable to stop the run.

Rodgers was faced with a 3rd and 20 because of a backbreaking penalty, with the Packers behind and needing a score.

Both were bad; Favre's was a lot worse. They aren't even comparable.

However, the correct parallel situation is when Favre threw the interception against Dallas in the 1995 NFC Championship. Circumstances were similar to this game, and I don't blame Favre for that one at all.

I wouldn't have blamed him

I would have.

Riiiight. [/quote:2c076b51f4]

Liar![/quote:2c076b51f4]

Sez you![/quote:2c076b51f4]

Piss off!

[mraynrand]

Re: Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

[quote:9b94c7b1c6="Pacopete4"][quote:9b94c7b1c6="cpk1994"][quote:9b94c7b1c6="Pacopete4"][quote:9b94c7b1c6="packerbacker1234"]Yes, he played well. He also had a very boneheaded int.

Raise of hands - even if hurt, had Favre been our QB and threw that int, how many people would solely blaim this game on #4?

I am sure many, because that has been happening now for 8 seasons with him. Suddenly, because AR is hurt, he gets no blaim for the int? It was a crucial mistake in a big situation. Say what you will, everyone screwed up,a nd certaintly it should not come down to that int... but we all know if it was Favre instead it would be his head being blamed.

Just saying, AR has to own up mistakes too. It wasn't a overall bad game, but a crucial mistake cost us points. We lost by three. Seems to me those points were crucial.

let me tell ya.. I'd be the first to back ya up here cuz the whole situation stinks.. and ur right, there are tons on these boards who blamed everything on Brett when it was going bad and then sucked his dick when he was playing lights out... but the pick he threw was him trying his best to get us outta the gutter... he tried to fit a ball in on 3rd and long knowing our punter hits em about 30 yards and the time was runnin out in the game... i have no problem with it.. hindsight is always 20/20

You would know about sucking FAvre's dick.

I would not have blamed this on Brett. The INT? yes. The game no.

My thoughts exactly. Wasn't favre blamed solely for that loss to philly in the playoffs, even though he played a really solid game?

Same situation my friend. In terms of importance to the game when the int happened, that is.

I never blamed Favre solely for that loss. The only losses I have blamed Favre for was the 5 INT game against Cincinatti when Favre ruined a great defensive effort, and the 6 INT game against St. Louis. Other than that I blame Favre for his INts no the games.

Then your one of the few reasonable people that realize that favre alone rarely can win a game, and he alone rarely is responsible for losing a game. Many other factors come into play.

Although, Favre's last game with the jets... i must say he layed down a good beatdown pretty much on his own. The run game stillw asn't working, the defense gave up 30+ points, and he just winged TD after TD.

Was insane. Still, those are very rare moments. I apologize then, but a lot of other people blame favre not just for the int, but for the game.

Different situations. Favre didn't need to take a risk like that, as it was 2nd down, they were tied, first possession of overtime, and the defense unable to stop the run.

Rodgers was faced with a 3rd and 20 because of a backbreaking penalty, with the Packers behind and needing a score.

Both were bad; Favre's was a lot worse. They aren't even comparable.

However, the correct parallel situation is when Favre threw the interception against Dallas in the 1995 NFC Championship. Circumstances were similar to this game, and I don't blame Favre for that one at all.

I wouldn't have blamed him

I would have.

Riiiight. [/quote:9b94c7b1c6]

Liar![/quote:9b94c7b1c6]

Sez you![/quote:9b94c7b1c6]

Piss off![/quote:9b94c7b1c6]

You piss off!

[mraynrand]

Re: Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

[quote:05467ba123="packerbacker1234"][quote:05467ba123="Pacopete4"][quote:05467ba123="cpk1994"][quote:05467ba123="Pacopete4"][quote:05467ba123="packerbacker1234"]Yes, he played well. He also had a very boneheaded int.

Raise of hands - even if hurt, had Favre been our QB and threw that int, how many people would solely blaim this game on #4?

I am sure many, because that has been happening now for 8 seasons with him. Suddenly, because AR is hurt, he gets no blaim for the int? It was a crucial mistake in a big situation. Say what you will, everyone screwed up,a nd certaintly it should not come down to that int... but we all know if it was Favre instead it would be his head being blamed.

Just saying, AR has to own up mistakes too. It wasn't a overall bad game, but a crucial mistake cost us points. We lost by three. Seems to me those points were crucial.

let me tell ya.. I'd be the first to back ya up here cuz the whole situation stinks.. and ur right, there are tons on these boards who blamed everything on Brett when it was going bad and then sucked his dick when he was playing lights out... but the pick he threw was him trying his best to get us outta the gutter... he tried to fit a ball in on 3rd and long knowing our punter hits em about 30 yards and the time was runnin out in the game... i have no problem with it.. hindsight is always 20/20

You would know about sucking FAvre's dick.

I would not have blamed this on Brett. The INT? yes. The game no.

My thoughts exactly. Wasn't favre blamed solely for that loss to philly in the playoffs, even though he played a really solid game?

Same situation my friend. In terms of importance to the game when the int happened, that is.

I never blamed Favre solely for that loss. The only losses I have blamed Favre for was the 5 INT game against Cincinatti when Favre ruined a great defensive effort, and the 6 INT game against St. Louis. Other than that I blame Favre for his INts no the games.

Then your one of the few reasonable people that realize that favre alone rarely can win a game, and he alone rarely is responsible for losing a game. Many other factors come into play.

Although, Favre's last game with the jets... i must say he layed down a good beatdown pretty much on his own. The run game stillw asn't working, the defense gave up 30+ points, and he just winged TD after TD.

Was insane. Still, those are very rare moments. I apologize then, but a lot of other people blame favre not just for the int, but for the game.

Different situations. Favre didn't need to take a risk like that, as it was 2nd down, they were tied, first possession of overtime, and the defense unable to stop the run.

Rodgers was faced with a 3rd and 20 because of a backbreaking penalty, with the Packers behind and needing a score.

Both were bad; Favre's was a lot worse. They aren't even comparable.

However, the correct parallel situation is when Favre threw the interception against Dallas in the 1995 NFC Championship. Circumstances were similar to this game, and I don't blame Favre for that one at all.

I wouldn't have blamed him

I would have.

Riiiight. [/quote:05467ba123]

Liar![/quote:05467ba123]

Sez you![/quote:05467ba123]

Piss off![/quote:05467ba123]

You piss off![/quote:05467ba123]

Bite me!

[cpk1994]

Do you have split personality disorder?

[Pacopete4]

[Zool]

Hurray for slanted, one sided threads being started specifically to get the desired reaction. YAY!

I blame Rodgers for the INT and the Jenning pass. He played well though. I guess he has to be 35 for 35 to have a good game? Fucking stupid. Maybe if stupid fuck Finley doesnt hold on a God damned FG attempt, we are talking about a win.

That guy better not be active next week.

[Pacopete4]

Hurray for slanted, one sided threads being started specifically to get the desired reaction. YAY!

I blame Rodgers for the INT and the Jenning pass. He played well though. I guess he has to be 35 for 35 to have a good game? Fucking stupid. Maybe if stupid fuck Finley doesnt hold on a God damned FG attempt, we are talking about a win.

That guy better not be active next week.

Favre paid Finley to fuck it up so Rodgers looks bad... thats what the rumor is on pft.com

[Zool]

Thats 2 awesome penalties on the moronic rookie in 3 weeks. Time to sit him down for a bit.

[cpk1994]

Thats 2 awesome penalties on the moronic rookie in 3 weeks. Time to sit him down for a bit.

Im not sure you can with the depth problems.

[Zool]

Thats 2 awesome penalties on the moronic rookie in 3 weeks. Time to sit him down for a bit.

Im not sure you can with the depth problems.

I think we'll be fine with 5 healthy WR's and 2 healthy TE's.

[cpk1994]

Thats 2 awesome penalties on the moronic rookie in 3 weeks. Time to sit him down for a bit.

Im not sure you can with the depth problems.

I think we'll be fine with 5 healthy WR's and 2 healthy TE's.

I was thinking in terms of special teams. But on offense yes you are right.

[PackerTimer]

Re: Oh the Irony - AR escapes criticism due to injury.

Yes, he played well. He also had a very boneheaded int.

Raise of hands - even if hurt, had Favre been our QB and threw that int, how many people would solely blaim this game on #4?

I am sure many, because that has been happening now for 8 seasons with him. Suddenly, because AR is hurt, he gets no blaim for the int? It was a crucial mistake in a big situation. Say what you will, everyone screwed up,a nd certaintly it should not come down to that int... but we all know if it was Favre instead it would be his head being blamed.

Just saying, AR has to own up mistakes too. It wasn't a overall bad game, but a crucial mistake cost us points. We lost by three. Seems to me those points were crucial.

What is your point? Yes, there would have been people who blamed the loss of Favre just like you and other some others appear to be blaiming Rodgers for the loss. People who would have blamed Favre were morons just like people who blame Rodgers are morons.

How is he escaping criticism? It was a bonehead play just like Favres interception against the Eagles were a bonehead play, but neither was responsible for the loss. People were critical of Rodgers for that pass but nor for his entire performance. Rodgers played an outstaning game and deserves a ton of credit. He also made a bad play.

[gbgary]

without reading a single other post in this thread, , i'll say that i posted in another thread, that his int was a game killer. i also posted that he had a very gutsy performance and kept fighting. i'm really starting to like this guy. he showed me something today. i hope everyone noticed that he's got heart. he's not brett, no one ever will be, but what's done is done. time and more talent is what's needed to fix the Pack.

what did we really expect from the youngest, least experienced team in the league?