Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ruvell for 3rd receiver?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ruvell for 3rd receiver?

    I am really warming up to Ruvell Martin. It seems like all he does is make plays. With JJ hurt, and Jordy a rookie, I'd like to see them give Ruvell some more reps.

    Anybody with me on this?

  • #2
    I like him were he is, he's not the fastest guy in the world but he has decent hands... JJ made a good catch yesterday, and is definitely a bigger threat in the slot...

    I would like to see him out there more then the rookie though, it seems like he is #5 instead of #4 on the depth chart...

    Comment


    • #3
      Martin brings a couple of strengths over both Jones and Nelson, IMO.

      First, he has excellent height. For the corner end zone type of "toss-up" pass, his height is an asset over the shorter defensive backs.

      Second, he is a very good downfield blocker. His blocking is an advantage for screens, passes in the flat, etc.

      Comment


      • #4
        I say "If in ain't broke, don't fix it". Ruvell should saty where he is.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          I say "If in ain't broke, don't fix it". Ruvell should saty where he is.
          In my opinion, what we have is working "just good enough". I always strive for excellence, so I'd rather give Martin his shot at glory.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by oregonpackfan
            Martin brings a couple of strengths over both Jones and Nelson, IMO.

            First, he has excellent height. For the corner end zone type of "toss-up" pass, his height is an asset over the shorter defensive backs.

            Second, he is a very good downfield blocker. His blocking is an advantage for screens, passes in the flat, etc.
            Very good point. I didn't even consider his blocking and the potential positive ramifications this could have on the third down screens M3 likes to run to Jackson.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by oregonpackfan
              Second, he is a very good downfield blocker. His blocking is an advantage for screens, passes in the flat, etc.
              Good point. A lot of people don't realize how much a good blocking wide out can help a running game. Turns 5 yard runs into 15 yard runs.
              Fred's Slacks is a Winner!

              Comment


              • #8
                Jordy Nelson is a much more fluid athlete than the other two guys, he is already doing fine out there.

                Play Nelson as the #3, go for the upside.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't care where they play him as long as they "get him the damn ball"

                  I was screaming for Rodgers to throw the ball to Ruvell on Sunday...and they did a few times.
                  C.H.U.D.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I've always like Martin. I like the tall guy in the End Zone

                    James Jones though looks like a stud...
                    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Tony Oday
                      James Jones though looks like a stud...
                      James Jones looks like a stud?
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I think he looks HUGE going over the middle...he will be a stud...sorry I should have clarified that
                        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't see a big difference between Martin, Nelson, and Jones at this point. Martin does need more reps. I think James Jones will eventually prove to be the best of the lot though.
                          70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Can Ruvell play guard, tackle or center? Maybe defensive Lineman or defensive end? No? crap.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I like our WR's just where they are. I was on board with moving Nelson up to #3 before the season began, but I'm fine with JJ as our #3 and Nelson as our #4. I'm okay with bringing in Martin on certain plays as the #3 or #4, such as 3rd and medium or RZ attempts, but I don't think he should be lining up as a #3 or #4 on a regular basis.
                              Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X