Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Be TT for a day. Do you do the C. Williams trade NOW?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Scott Campbell
    Originally posted by Bretsky
    Originally posted by Scott Campbell
    The reason JH dropped to 16 was his injury history.

    That was the company line at least


    Company line? There seemed to be quite a bit of conventional thinking aligned with him going higher if healthy.
    supposedly denver was going to take him at 18
    Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Guiness
      I'm one of those who was stunned at the money, but thought he was at least borderline worth it.

      With the benefit of hindsight, I don't make the trade now...not because he wouldn't help (I think he would) but because of the way he's behaved since he 'got paid'. Including running his mouth off before this w/e's game with the Giants.

      What I would do though is franchise him, force him to play (he won't be happy, but he will play) and let him walk next year.
      Why let him just walk? I think it was smart of TT to get something for him. And it is still WAY to early to write off Brohm as a bust. 98% of all rookie QBs suck when they first get started. Heck, even BF struggled like mad when he began to play regularly.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Scott Campbell
        Originally posted by Bretsky
        Originally posted by Scott Campbell
        The reason JH dropped to 16 was his injury history.

        That was the company line at least


        Company line? There seemed to be quite a bit of conventional thinking aligned with him going higher if healthy.

        Only spot I ever heard that top ten jargon was from was our own. If you have other sources feel free to provide them. I'm pretty draft fanatical; most publications had JH going in the second half of round one. I'm not sure he warranted a top ten selection based on his college credentials.
        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

        Comment


        • #34
          I just remember all the decent QBs that cycled through the Packers when Favre was here: Hasslebeck, Warner, Brooks, Brunell, Detmer, Pederson to name a few. These guys may not have all been world beaters however they were all good enough to start.
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Bretsky
            Originally posted by Scott Campbell
            Originally posted by Bretsky
            Originally posted by Scott Campbell
            The reason JH dropped to 16 was his injury history.

            That was the company line at least


            Company line? There seemed to be quite a bit of conventional thinking aligned with him going higher if healthy.

            Only spot I ever heard that top ten jargon was from was our own. If you have other sources feel free to provide them.

            The top 10 jargon was only if he didn't have the injury history.




            16. Green Bay Packers — Justin Harrell; defensive tackle, Tennessee

            * Grade: B+
            * Great defensive tackle who missed much of 2006 because of a torn bicep; big (6′5 300), strong, and athletic man in the middle; could have been top 10 had he played all of 2006

            Comment

            Working...
            X