Bitching and trolling from two who won't take it to PM!!!!!

[cpk1994]

I don't care if he told M3 to do it or not. I just don't agree with the risk of further injury to his shoulder. Especially the TD...let Grant take the abuse. It's time for him to start earning his paycheck.

Diud you disagree with Sherman, Homlgren, McCarthy any time they put him at further risk of injury, like his broken thumb? I didn't and I have no problem with McCarthy going ahead business as usual. You don't play scared. Thats what will really get ARod seriously injured.

First of all, at the time we had an Iron Man for a QB and not two rookies backing him up. Secondly, let's admit that M3 doesn't exactly play aggressive football. I guess I don't even see how the two factors are comparable.

Who the hell cares if Favre was an Ironman? They didn't fear anything with Faver and that is the mentality they need with Rodgers. Again, you don't play scared. That will get Rodgers seriously injured.

[Fritz]

You can't say, really, that the Packers' record would be any better if Favre were the QB. This team's troubles don't come from that position.

[packerbacker1234]

I don't care if he told M3 to do it or not. I just don't agree with the risk of further injury to his shoulder. Especially the TD...let Grant take the abuse. It's time for him to start earning his paycheck.

Whoa.

Guys, there is something you need to understand.

You do not play football worrying about injuries. You do that, and you lose games.

Look, you want to not risk further injury to the shoulder? Then do the smart thing and don't let Rodgers play. When is he wincing in pain? Whenever he throws a football. You want to really not risk further injury? Then he needs to stop throwing the football and rest for a week.

QB sneaks are not the issue. Throwing the ball is. HE said it himself, nothing else that he does, including hitting the shoulder, hurts, but when throwing the ball it's the only time he knows the shoulder is hurt. So, that would mean he needs to not throw.

Just saying, it is what it is. You play like you would normally play, or you don't play at all.

[cpk1994]

might be the easiest but I think the problem a lot of us have is that his shoulder is obviously really hurting.. why risk losing him, given our backup situation is not as sound as we'd like

Favre had Pteresen, Bono etc. WHy risk further injury to him given that his backup situation sucked? You don't change philosophies no matter who is the QB. IF he can play, he will play to the fullest degree. GO all out or not at all. This half ass shit will get ARod killed.

[Partial]

Mods, please lock this as a protest to shut cpk and paco up. It's really irritating.

[Pacopete4]

might be the easiest but I think the problem a lot of us have is that his shoulder is obviously really hurting.. why risk losing him, given our backup situation is not as sound as we'd like

Favre had Pteresen, Bono etc. WHy risk further injury to him given that his backup situation sucked? You don't change philosophies no matter who is the QB. IF he can play, he will play to the fullest degree. GO all out or not at all. This half ass shit will get ARod killed.

how many QB sneaks did u see Favre do? Rodgers probably has surpassed him in that total already

[BF4MVP]

You can't say, really, that the Packers' record would be any better if Favre were the QB. This team's troubles don't come from that position.

QFT

[cpk1994]

I don't care if he told M3 to do it or not. I just don't agree with the risk of further injury to his shoulder. Especially the TD...let Grant take the abuse. It's time for him to start earning his paycheck.

Diud you disagree with Sherman, Homlgren, McCarthy any time they put him at further risk of injury, like his broken thumb? I didn't and I have no problem with McCarthy going ahead business as usual. You don't play scared. Thats what will really get ARod seriously injured.

that has zero to do with it... sooner or later we gotta be able to run the ball on 3-4th and 1...

I didn't ask you troll.

this is the stuff people are sick of from u... can u just stop? u will ruin another thread

Only when you finally cut out your troll bullshit. I am simply calling you out becuase no one else will.

[cpk1994]

might be the easiest but I think the problem a lot of us have is that his shoulder is obviously really hurting.. why risk losing him, given our backup situation is not as sound as we'd like

Favre had Pteresen, Bono etc. WHy risk further injury to him given that his backup situation sucked? You don't change philosophies no matter who is the QB. IF he can play, he will play to the fullest degree. GO all out or not at all. This half ass shit will get ARod killed.

how many QB sneaks did u see Favre do? Rodgers probably has surpassed him in that total already

Good god, you have no clue what I am talking about.

[Pacopete4]

might be the easiest but I think the problem a lot of us have is that his shoulder is obviously really hurting.. why risk losing him, given our backup situation is not as sound as we'd like

Favre had Pteresen, Bono etc. WHy risk further injury to him given that his backup situation sucked? You don't change philosophies no matter who is the QB. IF he can play, he will play to the fullest degree. GO all out or not at all. This half ass shit will get ARod killed.

how many QB sneaks did u see Favre do? Rodgers probably has surpassed him in that total already

Good god, you have no clue what I am talking about.

no one does I guess

[GBRulz]

You can't say, really, that the Packers' record would be any better if Favre were the QB. This team's troubles don't come from that position.

I don't think that is the argument at all here.

[packerbacker1234]

might be the easiest but I think the problem a lot of us have is that his shoulder is obviously really hurting.. why risk losing him, given our backup situation is not as sound as we'd like

Favre had Pteresen, Bono etc. WHy risk further injury to him given that his backup situation sucked? You don't change philosophies no matter who is the QB. IF he can play, he will play to the fullest degree. GO all out or not at all. This half ass shit will get ARod killed.

how many QB sneaks did u see Favre do? Rodgers probably has surpassed him in that total already

Your right, Favre didn't do a lot of QB sneaks - and I am sure that is not his fault. Holgrem wasn't that sort of coach.

MM is, and I think Favre's age is the only reason MM didn't have Favre QB sneaking. Sorry, but while some of the posters here are very adament about whats going on... I tend to agree.

You either play the game like nothing is wrong, or you don't play at all. Whenever a team caters something different towards an injured player playing, that is when they usually risk further injury. Sure, the cater this time would be not QB sneaking: That cater could also mean no GB victory.


Oh and fellas - The seakhawks may be the worst team in football right now, and we didn't exactly dominate them. Rodgers may have played well... but overall we didn't look too good against a really bad team.

[pbmax]

cpk, please knock it off. Calling people a troll isn't stopping anything and it renders a thread useless. Trust that others can see what you see and pay it the appropriate amount of attention.

It might also be that after keyboard wrestling all summer, you might be overreacting to normal posts. Take some cues from other posters. You might be surprised how quickly stuff gets called out on the board without resorting to troll debates.

[Pacopete4]

might be the easiest but I think the problem a lot of us have is that his shoulder is obviously really hurting.. why risk losing him, given our backup situation is not as sound as we'd like

Favre had Pteresen, Bono etc. WHy risk further injury to him given that his backup situation sucked? You don't change philosophies no matter who is the QB. IF he can play, he will play to the fullest degree. GO all out or not at all. This half ass shit will get ARod killed.

how many QB sneaks did u see Favre do? Rodgers probably has surpassed him in that total already

Your right, Favre didn't do a lot of QB sneaks - and I am sure that is not his fault. Holgrem wasn't that sort of coach.

MM is, and I think Favre's age is the only reason MM didn't have Favre QB sneaking. Sorry, but while some of the posters here are very adament about whats going on... I tend to agree.

You either play the game like nothing is wrong, or you don't play at all. Whenever a team caters something different towards an injured player playing, that is when they usually risk further injury. Sure, the cater this time would be not QB sneaking: That cater could also mean no GB victory.


Oh and fellas - The seakhawks may be the worst team in football right now, and we didn't exactly dominate them. Rodgers may have played well... but overall we didn't look too good against a really bad team.

very good points.. but do u think that MM didnt cater to Rodgers at all in this game? I kinda think he did at times..

[GBRulz]

way to ruin another thread, cpk.

I'm so sick of this BS.

I know a few would have issues with mods zapping posts, but sometimes a courtesy flush is necessary.