Time to sit Wells? Clifton?

[Patler]

Scott Wells did not participate in practice on Thursday. He strained a chest muscle in practice on Wednesday. They don't believe it is serious, but are being careful. Clifton of course was held out of practice, too.

Wells is becoming amazingly unreliable physically for a young guy. MM emphasized a few weeks ago that the line needed to practice together in order to improve its performance. He even had Clifton take more reps during the week before last because of that, but then Clifton was out most if not all of last week's practices.

When these guys are out it affects two positions, because Colledge and Spitz are their backups. So not only do Clifton and Wells miss their practices, Colledge and Spitz miss reps at their regular positions, too. Then game time rolls around and you have 4 changes from the way they lined up in practice. Only Tauscher stays the same.

If Sitton is healthy, I think it is time to pull the plug on Wells as the starter, go to Spitz at center and start Sitton. I'm close to saying the same for Clifton.

[Tarlam!]

I've been thinking this (your thread title) and added Tausch for 3 weeks. I know Wells has only been back less.

I love all 3 for what they have done for the Packers, but it's time for them to become backups.

[Patler]

I still think Tauscher is the best RT on the team.

I'm less convinced that Colledge-Barbre is worse than Clifton-Colledge (or some other variation such as Spitz at LG and Sitton at RG.) Once Clifton gets over the hamstring or whatever his injury is, I think they will be better with him, but I would be willing to try another lineup until he gets as healed as he can.

I would really like to try Spitz at center with Sitton at guard. I think Wells-Spitz is better than Spitz-Moll, but I would like to see Spitz-Sitton for a game.

[CaliforniaCheez]

Clifton has a high cap number and I don't see him finishing his contract.

I look for more than one O lineman to be drafted new year.

Sure a couple of high picks will go to DT with contracts expiring soon. CB may get one but mid rounders will be on the O-line.

Tauscher's contract is up at the end of the year. Barbre and Sitton are promising at Guard. The tackles need upgrading and a little bit of competition will help. Moll is not the answer.

Spitz and Colledge still deserve more time as they are still learning and improving.

Every draft at least one O-lineman and one D-lineman is needed. Regardless of other needs.

[mraynrand]

Patler, the coaches should know if the constant disruption is causing the loss of line cohesiveness. I suspect they are really close to doing what you suggest. It wouldn't surprise me if the new line is revealed after the bye week. The key will be to look at those nagging injuries and ask: "Is this going to go on all year?" If they think the answer is yes, it's time to pull the plug on the two of them. If no, they might try to use the bye week to heal everyone up and keep going. If Wells and Clifton continue to be hurt after that, then it may kill the second half of the season along the line. I think they should make the change over the bye, if not this week. (If Colledge were to go this week, he would really have his hands full - good thing the game is not on turf in Indy).

[Patler]

TT has drafted O-linemen every year, usually two, and I don't see that changing. Wolf always seemed to draft some every year too. He said you have to just to cover normal attrition. Wolf always seemed to have a couple waiting in the wings to take over, but that was by necessity, especially guards, because he didn't believe in paying the guards all that much and was content with new starters on the O-line just about every year.

I'm sort of intrigued by Giacomini. Obviously he is of no help whatsoever this year, and may not be next year either, he is that raw, apparently. But with a couple years of weight training, he could be a huge RT, and they say he has very good feet and athleticism. They also say he is extremely focused and very tenacious. Might turn out to be nothing, but looks like he could be an interesting developmental player, too.

[Patler]

Patler, the coaches should know if the constant disruption is causing the loss of line cohesiveness. I suspect they are really close to doing what you suggest. It wouldn't surprise me if the new line is revealed after the bye week. The key will be to look at those nagging injuries and ask: "Is this going to go on all year?" If they think the answer is yes, it's time to pull the plug on the two of them. If no, they might try to use the bye week to heal everyone up and keep going. If Wells and Clifton continue to be hurt after that, then it may kill the second half of the season along the line. I think they should make the change over the bye, if not this week. (If Colledge were to go this week, he would really have his hands full - good thing the game is not on turf in Indy).

I agree. I was surprised that MM mentioned the disruptions were taking their toll. He even said he talked to Clifton about sitting out last week and this to have basically 3-4 weeks to recover, and allow the team to have consistency in practice and games. MM seems concerned about the disruptions, but also seems a bit reluctant to act. The bye week might be the time for him to think it through and do it. Clifton has been such a rock in pass protection that I can understand TT's reluctance to sit him.

With Wells it is turning out to be one thing after another. He missed three starts last year, and has been hurt through out the off season and now with one thing or another.

[PackerTimer]

Re: Time to sit Wells? Clifton?

I agree. If these guys can't practice at all, then it's time to sit them until they are healthy enough to go in practice. I agree that it's better to have Colledge - Barbre - Spitz - Sitton - Tausch practice and then play than it is to have that group practice and then Clifton - Colledge - Wells - Spitz - Tausch play. Think about, one player is practicing at their position. Thats it. Everybody else is only getting reps at their position on game day. It makes no sense.

[AV David]

I too have been thinking Clifton and Wells should be benched for awhile. Sitton and Barbre are inexperienced but much stronger in moving big bodies in the run game. It can't hurt to try.

[Pugger]

I'm beginning to wonder if our poor line play can be attributed to coaching - especially Campen. Yes, some of the guys are hurting but before Campen became our line coach I don't remember our line playing this poorly even when we plugged in back-ups.... Or am I wrong....

[Patler]

I'm beginning to wonder if our poor line play can be attributed to coaching - especially Campen. Yes, some of the guys are hurting but before Campen became our line coach I don't remember our line playing this poorly even when we plugged in back-ups.... Or am I wrong....

The line didn't play well during Sherman's last season, with Wahle and Rivera gone, and Beightol as the O-line coach. Beightol took a lot of flak for that, even from some of Sherman's comments toward the end of the year. The line didn't play well in MM's first season with Joe Philbin as the O-line coach. It's been an ongoing concern.

[Freak Out]

Whoever is out there come Sunday they better be ready for Freeney.

[The Shadow]

Pressure (or lack of it) on Manning will tell the tale on Sunday.
Time for KGB to awaken.

[Tony Oday]

If these guys are too hurt to battle at a top level sit them and let them get healthy.

[The Shadow]

Wells is a bit easier to sub for (Spitz) than Clifton.