Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Former Packers resurfacing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Partial
    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
    Dude, you are hopeless. You call the vikings a bad team last year...if they are bad then the Raiders are a high school team.

    When does going 8-8 qualify you as bad?

    A 5.1 average is excelling. And, with a terrible team and no passing offense. On their second coach.

    Screen pass? LOL Yep, the raiders have been known for their short passing game for years.
    Yes... no running back has EVER caught a pass in the flat for the Raiders ever...

    5.1 average is misleading.. One huge game against a crummy defense and a team in disarray possibly worse than their own!

    0 TDs, 3.8 yard average outside of one anomaly of a game.. The name of the game is consistency Ty, and outside of one rare exception he has been consistently underwhelming.
    Dropped the bad team argument. LOL

    Ever: Stupid.

    Misleading: Do we do that for all players. Again, should we do that for Favre. Didn't answer last time.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
      Originally posted by Partial
      Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
      Dude, you are hopeless. You call the vikings a bad team last year...if they are bad then the Raiders are a high school team.

      When does going 8-8 qualify you as bad?

      A 5.1 average is excelling. And, with a terrible team and no passing offense. On their second coach.

      Screen pass? LOL Yep, the raiders have been known for their short passing game for years.
      Yes... no running back has EVER caught a pass in the flat for the Raiders ever...

      5.1 average is misleading.. One huge game against a crummy defense and a team in disarray possibly worse than their own!

      0 TDs, 3.8 yard average outside of one anomaly of a game.. The name of the game is consistency Ty, and outside of one rare exception he has been consistently underwhelming.
      Dropped the bad team argument. LOL

      Ever: Stupid.

      Misleading: Do we do that for all players. Again, should we do that for Favre. Didn't answer last time.
      Yes, you drop anomalies for all player evaluations imo. Bad team argument dropped? Their is no way even you can dispute that Kansas City is not awful.

      While it may not be a big portion of their offense, I'm sure their RBs have caught a fair amount of screens/passes in the flats.

      Playmakers make plays and McFadden to this point has not. Theirs really nothing else to argue.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Partial
        Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
        Originally posted by Partial
        Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
        Dude, you are hopeless. You call the vikings a bad team last year...if they are bad then the Raiders are a high school team.

        When does going 8-8 qualify you as bad?

        A 5.1 average is excelling. And, with a terrible team and no passing offense. On their second coach.

        Screen pass? LOL Yep, the raiders have been known for their short passing game for years.
        Yes... no running back has EVER caught a pass in the flat for the Raiders ever...

        5.1 average is misleading.. One huge game against a crummy defense and a team in disarray possibly worse than their own!

        0 TDs, 3.8 yard average outside of one anomaly of a game.. The name of the game is consistency Ty, and outside of one rare exception he has been consistently underwhelming.
        Dropped the bad team argument. LOL

        Ever: Stupid.

        Misleading: Do we do that for all players. Again, should we do that for Favre. Didn't answer last time.
        Yes, you drop anomalies for all player evaluations imo. Bad team argument dropped? Their is no way even you can dispute that Kansas City is not awful.

        While it may not be a big portion of their offense, I'm sure their RBs have caught a fair amount of screens/passes in the flats.

        Playmakers make plays and McFadden to this point has not. Theirs really nothing else to argue.
        Are you drunk? Peterson doesn't play for KC, he plays for the vikes, which you called bad last year at 8-8.

        Sure: Of course you are. You haven't watched a single game, yet you know their offense. Hmm, leading reciever among backs has 18, followed by DMC at 10. Fargas, the leading rusher is getting less than Bush and DMC. Yep, the leading guy is essentially getting 2 passes a game. So, at best the receivers are getting 4 passes a game. Our 3rd down back has more catches than all 3 and essentially as many as Bush and Fargas combined. My god, why do you make it so easy?

        Anomolies: So, then Favre with 10 tds and 11 ints is terrible right. Glad we cleared that up.

        Playmakers: Playmakers need players around them as well..you might have heard of them..they are called blockers.

        Comment

        Working...
        X