HEY HO..TED MUST GO

[Tarlam!]

Yes, but even tank accidentally made a point every now and again.

An he was at least entertaining.

He was irritating. And, after this thread title, I have to concur with those posters stating Gex = Tank.

Too bad.

[cpk1994]

Yes, but even tank accidentally made a point every now and again.

An he was at least entertaining.

He was irritating. And, after this thread title, I have to concur with those posters stating Gex = Tank.

Too bad.

True, Tank he was irritating at times, and yes I agree with the Gex = Tank. But even Tank had his funny moments. Can't say the same for Gex.

[cpk1994]

At least Mad addressed him in his other important thread. I'm still not convinced he isn't tank, trying to be less tanklike in an effort to cause trouble without being banned this time.

If he's not tank, he's fucking pathetic.

Then he is multi tasking becuase he is back on Sportsbubbler yet again after just being banned there.

[Zool]

Gex cant hold Tanks jock. Maybe someday but the kid just ain't got what it takes yet. He doesn't have that IT factor that P likes to talk about so much. If I met Tank I dont know what I would do exactly. Either punch him or buy him a beer. Gex I would ignore like so many fallen leaves now under the snow in my yard.

[SkinBasket]

Gex I would ignore like so many fallen leaves now under the snow in my yard.

You're a beautiful man on the inside, Zool.

[cpk1994]

Gex cant hold Tanks jock. Maybe someday but the kid just ain't got what it takes yet. He doesn't have that IT factor that P likes to talk about so much. If I met Tank I dont know what I would do exactly. Either punch him or buy him a beer. Gex I would ignore like so many fallen leaves now under the snow in my yard.

That theres funny. I don't care who ya are.

[Fritz]

Have you considered punching him, then buying him a beer? Or buying him a beer and then punching him?

Ah, Tank. A loveable A-hole.

[MOBB DEEP]

didnt tank say he was a weed head tho? get him stoned then harsh his mellow by yelln at him

no one likes being reamed when high off grass

[bobblehead]

Gex + Pete ~= Tank

Tank was the Barry Sanders of trolldom.

pete is foolish, but not nearly as inflamatory as gex. I personally am convinced that gex is tank...I think I was the first one to point it out this time. He held anonymity as long as he could, but can't contain himself any longer.

[Fritz]

To try to get this thread back to TT's future, I have been wondering lately if Ted's downfall might be his inability to construct a solid offensive line.

It takes offensive linemen, traditionally, time to develop - Marco Rivera and Mike Wahle are the Packer poster boys for this. And in my view, TT has done an excellent job with most of the position groups on this team - wide receiver, defensive backfield, running back, tight end, even linebacker. The defensive line even worked well last year, anyway.

But the o-line has never been solid. Last year, one could argue, Favre's presence led to the minimal number of sacks the QB took - he got through his reads quickly and got rid of the ball quickly.

And I don't think you can just fix an offensive line in one draft, the way Ron Wolf tried to fix the cornerback position in one draft years ago when he drafted Edwaqrds, Fred whoever and Mike Mackenzie in the first three rounds. Even if TT drafted two or three very good linemen next year, it would take at least two years - at least - for them to develop, and I don't think TT has that much time to deliver.

His fate may be tied to guys named Sitton, Barbre, Colledge, Spitz, and Giancomo (or whatever his name is).

[Bretsky]

To try to get this thread back to TT's future, I have been wondering lately if Ted's downfall might be his inability to construct a solid offensive line.

It takes offensive linemen, traditionally, time to develop - Marco Rivera and Mike Wahle are the Packer poster boys for this. And in my view, TT has done an excellent job with most of the position groups on this team - wide receiver, defensive backfield, running back, tight end, even linebacker. The defensive line even worked well last year, anyway.

But the o-line has never been solid. Last year, one could argue, Favre's presence led to the minimal number of sacks the QB took - he got through his reads quickly and got rid of the ball quickly.

And I don't think you can just fix an offensive line in one draft, the way Ron Wolf tried to fix the cornerback position in one draft years ago when he drafted Edwaqrds, Fred whoever and Mike Mackenzie in the first three rounds. Even if TT drafted two or three very good linemen next year, it would take at least two years - at least - for them to develop, and I don't think TT has that much time to deliver.

His fate may be tied to guys named Sitton, Barbre, Colledge, Spitz, and Giancomo (or whatever his name is).

I've been begging for a FA OG to get signed for years; we've got so much money the price does not matter that much. Then let all the newbies fight it out. But TT does not believe in FA, which is fine. What I see is the recipe to have a pretty decent team year after year. Not sure this is the recipe for a title unless you believe TT will hit it huge on some draft picks and get a few more stars along the way. We'll always be young though.

[sheepshead]

To try to get this thread back to TT's future, I have been wondering lately if Ted's downfall might be his inability to construct a solid offensive line.

It takes offensive linemen, traditionally, time to develop - Marco Rivera and Mike Wahle are the Packer poster boys for this. And in my view, TT has done an excellent job with most of the position groups on this team - wide receiver, defensive backfield, running back, tight end, even linebacker. The defensive line even worked well last year, anyway.

But the o-line has never been solid. Last year, one could argue, Favre's presence led to the minimal number of sacks the QB took - he got through his reads quickly and got rid of the ball quickly.

And I don't think you can just fix an offensive line in one draft, the way Ron Wolf tried to fix the cornerback position in one draft years ago when he drafted Edwaqrds, Fred whoever and Mike Mackenzie in the first three rounds. Even if TT drafted two or three very good linemen next year, it would take at least two years - at least - for them to develop, and I don't think TT has that much time to deliver.

His fate may be tied to guys named Sitton, Barbre, Colledge, Spitz, and Giancomo (or whatever his name is).

I've been begging for a FA OG to get signed for years; we've got so much money the price does not matter that much. Then let all the newbies fight it out. But TT does not believe in FA, which is fine. What I see is the recipe to have a pretty decent team year after year. Not sure this is the recipe for a title unless you believe TT will hit it huge on some draft picks and get a few more stars along the way. We'll always be young though.

The problem with OL is their production drops off after we would get them. They want huge guarantees and maybe would be worth the money for 2-3 years. I'm not saying exceptions arent out there, but that is a buyer beware position for sure.

[MOBB DEEP]

quote]

I've been begging for a FA OG to get signed for years; we've got so much money the price does not matter that much. Then let all the newbies fight it out. But TT does not believe in FA, which is fine. What I see is the recipe to have a pretty decent team year after year. Not sure this is the recipe for a title unless you believe TT will hit it huge on some draft picks and get a few more stars along the way. We'll always be young though.[/quote]

Bretsky, do u or anyone else know tt's rationale for balkn at FA?

B, do u know a lady named kelly ackley from fort?

she was the first white hottie i dated during my 2 years at uw whitewater. she had redic body for a youngn so if she hasnt been workn out it's probably flabby 15 years later. hope she's not ur wife...

[LEWCWA]

Wow--look at how a real discussion can develope if people quit bashing other posters. The whole slew comes out and wastes 2.5 pages bashing one poster, with nothing intelligent to say on the subject. Now who are the trolls around here......Some of you really need to get through high school...This is a viable topic if discussed. There are viable reasons to want TT fired....but we can't discuss that, because of the thread hijacking police!

[wist43]

Even I don't want TT fired, even though I believe the Packers can't win a championship with him at the helm.

He's brought in enough talent to justify keeping him around, and I believe he will continue to draft the occasional Greg Jennings along with the occasional Justin Harrell. 56 draft picks every year, to what end??? Ultimately, we are spinning our wheels.

We're going to continue to run passive schemes on both sides of the ball, and we will perpetually be the youngest team in the league with all the draft picks every year, but who cares, nothing is going to change for at least 4 years. I've settled in for the long haul on this one.

Maybe I'm just feeling mellow tonight, and tomorrow I'll call for his head...