What's better than beating the Bears?

[gbgary]

:P

HELLO!!

[RashanGary]

Re: What's better than beating the Bears?

What's better than beating the Bears?

How about a 3 way cluster fuck?

[pbmax]

Re: What's better than beating the Bears?

What's better than beating the Bears?

How about a 3 way cluster fuck?

That is just plain rude to describe the Bear's WR corp that way.

[RashanGary]

Putting an end to all of the premature cliff diving that has been going on around here and beating the Bears is nice.

The Packers are a good, young team that IMO are on the way up. They have some issues on the D and O lines, but they are good and should continue to get better. They're not a SB team right now, but they're playoff competitive. This was a nice win. It doesn't mean we're a top NFC team. We're not. The last two tough losses didn't mean we're spiraling downward with a GM that is driving teh Packers into NFL obscurity like the 1970's. People are so freaking fickle with their ups and downs.

Thank Aaron we don't have to sit around and listen to the whiny chicken littles for at least a week but I sure don't think this dominate win means we are a dominate team. It was a good game by a good but flawed young team with their backs against the wall. That's it.

[Partial]

Aaron is batting .500, 4 good games, 4 bad games since game footage has become available of him. The offense was still extremely vanilla, but they established a strong running game which allowed for Aaron to be moderately effective.

Kudos to the running game. Where has that been all year?

[BallHawk]

Aaron is batting .500, 4 good games, 4 bad games since game footage has become available of him. The offense was still extremely vanilla, but they established a strong running game which allowed for Aaron to be moderately effective.

Kudos to the running game. Where has that been all year?

I'll take vanilla and 30 offense produced points any day of the year.

[Partial]

Aaron is batting .500, 4 good games, 4 bad games since game footage has become available of him. The offense was still extremely vanilla, but they established a strong running game which allowed for Aaron to be moderately effective.

Kudos to the running game. Where has that been all year?

I'll take vanilla and 30 offense produced points any day of the year.

Agreed, but the facts are they aren't producing anywhere near 30 points week in and week out. I did the homework and broke it down once. Search my archives in classic tank fashion

If they continue to run like this, they could win with trent dilfer behind center. This is how it should have been all year. Not requiring A-Rod to do much to win.

[RashanGary]

Partial, you're living in the past.

All of your posts have to do with either Aaron not being good enough to win games or not being as good as Brett or of Brett being great. Your avatar is Brett leading the Pack (he doesn't). Let it go. Let it go.

There is a fun football season to follow here. You don't have to hold on. You can move on and enjoy football without Brett. Really.

[Partial]

Partial, you're living in the past.

All of your posts have to do with either Aaron not being good enough to win games or not being as good as Brett or of Brett being great. Your avatar is Brett leading the Pack (he doesn't). Let it go. Let it go.

There is a fun football season to follow here. You don't have to hold on. You can move on and enjoy football without Brett. Really.

Living in the past? I'm living in the present, focusing on my posts around actual metrics. The offense is vanilla, we're .500 with one win over a winning team, and the team has been incredibly inconsistent in a league where consistency is king.

Perhaps you're living in a fantasy world about how good this team is, but for the amount of talent they have ( top 5 talent in NFL in my opinion), they are a colossal disappointment.

How does anything in that post have to do with living in the past? Pointing out the stats concerning the severely struggling offense in recent weeks? Saying if they keep running the ball like this Trent Dilfer could win? Give me a fucking break guy.

[mission]

Partial, you're living in the past.

All of your posts have to do with either Aaron not being good enough to win games or not being as good as Brett or of Brett being great. Your avatar is Brett leading the Pack (he doesn't). Let it go. Let it go.

There is a fun football season to follow here. You don't have to hold on. You can move on and enjoy football without Brett. Really.

Living in the past? I'm living in the present, focusing on my posts around actual metrics. The offense is vanilla, we're .500 with one win over a winning team, and the team has been incredibly inconsistent in a league where consistency is king.

Perhaps you're living in a fantasy world about how good this team is, but for the amount of talent they have ( top 5 talent in NFL in my opinion), they are a colossal disappointment.

How can you have Top 5 talent with a below average quarterback? The QB is such an important position in the NFL and since there are so many good ones, I just dont see how you could put our talent that high when you rate our QB so low.

Doesn't make sense according to, you know, metrics and all logic and all that stuff.

[cpk1994]

Partial, you're living in the past.

All of your posts have to do with either Aaron not being good enough to win games or not being as good as Brett or of Brett being great. Your avatar is Brett leading the Pack (he doesn't). Let it go. Let it go.

There is a fun football season to follow here. You don't have to hold on. You can move on and enjoy football without Brett. Really.

I agree. Its obvious he can't let go. However, he doesn't have to enjoy foot ball without Brett. Im sure there are a few Jets forums out there that he can slobber all over Brett on.

[Partial]

Partial, you're living in the past.

All of your posts have to do with either Aaron not being good enough to win games or not being as good as Brett or of Brett being great. Your avatar is Brett leading the Pack (he doesn't). Let it go. Let it go.

There is a fun football season to follow here. You don't have to hold on. You can move on and enjoy football without Brett. Really.

Living in the past? I'm living in the present, focusing on my posts around actual metrics. The offense is vanilla, we're .500 with one win over a winning team, and the team has been incredibly inconsistent in a league where consistency is king.

Perhaps you're living in a fantasy world about how good this team is, but for the amount of talent they have ( top 5 talent in NFL in my opinion), they are a colossal disappointment.

How can you have Top 5 talent with a below average quarterback? The QB is such an important position in the NFL and since there are so many good ones, I just dont see how you could put our talent that high when you rate our QB so low.

Doesn't make sense according to, you know, metrics and all logic and all that stuff.

Exactly, and that is one of the reasons the team is struggling. We have the deepest receiving corps in the NFL. BJack and Grant are both solid backs and provide a good 1-2 punch. Our offensive line has a lot of talent on it. On the DL, we have 4 solid or better players in Jenks, Kamp, Pick and Jolly. Three solid LB. Very solid secondary, possibly the best in the league.

Can't dispute the lack of offensive production. Hopefully today is a breakout game. To this point, from weeks 3 to 11, they have been borderline poor with a stellar 15 and a half points per game of offensive production.

[Partial]

Partial, you're living in the past.

All of your posts have to do with either Aaron not being good enough to win games or not being as good as Brett or of Brett being great. Your avatar is Brett leading the Pack (he doesn't). Let it go. Let it go.

There is a fun football season to follow here. You don't have to hold on. You can move on and enjoy football without Brett. Really.

I agree. Its obvious he can't let go. However, he doesn't have to enjoy foot ball without Brett. Im sure there are a few Jets forums out there that he can slobber all over Brett on.

And again, more trolling. Did I address you? Harrells post was ridic to begin with and had nothing to do with what I have stated. Does it really require another response?

Madtown, ban this joker.

[RashanGary]

The Packers have the 16th ranked defense in points allowed and the 5th rated QB in QB rating, 7th in TD passes and has thrown fewer picks than just about all of the other leading passers. Oh yeah, and that QB hasn't practiced for most of the year, is 24 years old and has never started an NFL football game before the start of this season, of which he's playing probowl football.

It sounds like your metrics and logic start with an opinion that you won't let go, it gets filled in with what you want to believe and then that opinion gets distributed on this forum in a way that can't be construed as anything but garbage. LIke I said, let it go. I know your'e not this stupid in real life.

[gbgary]

until today the offense was stuggling because (imo) it was too much for AR to handle at this point in his development, injuries, and scheme. today they went back to basics. ran more, kept people in to block, ran less shotgun and i don't remember ANY empty backfield formations or 5 wr formations. AR wasn't sacked as i remember, the ball was spread around to different receivers, he had time, grant and friends ran the ball great, and best of all the defense had plenty of rest between action.