Originally posted by boiga
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Doyel: "Packers are dangerous"
Collapse
X
-
I suspect the smiley face meant you were kidding this team looks good against teams with no pass rush and stands no chance against teams that use the 3-4 or have a dominate pass rush.Originally posted by BallHawkNice article and I tend to agree with him. I think we're gonna see a NFC Championship rematch of NY and Green Bay, but with a different result.
And talk about selective statistics.
He threw for 227 yards and two touchdowns Sunday and was nearly perfect, going 23-for-30 with incompletions including a drop, a spike and two throwaways to avoid sacks.
Comment
-
Technically the Bears have an easier sched...by one game in the common opponents. Of the three teams, Chicago has the easiest schedule based on the combined record of its remaining opponents (24-36). Green Bay (25-35) is next and Minnesota (31-29) follows.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerI disagree that the Bears schedule is easier.Originally posted by digitaldeanWow, nice article. Thanks for posting it.
The Packers are the best team in the division. If they don't shoot themselves in the foot, they will win the division.
Yes, the run defense is suspect at best. The Bears have been in a funk defensively the past several weeks and the Vikings offense minus Peterson is horrific. (e.g., last 4 Viking possessions - fumble, punt on TB 39 yard line, turned over on downs, fumble).
The Bears running game wasn't stellar. Plus, as the article pointed out from today's game, Hester is not the return force he once was.
Saints - Panthers - Texans - Jaguars - Bears - Lions for GB.
Rams - Vikings - Jags -Saints - Packers - Texans for Chicago
Jags - Bears - Lions - Cards - Falcons - Giants for Minny
Bears have the slightly easier schedule, Minny the hardest, GB's in between.
I see the Packers with a do-able 4-2 mark. Chicago with 4-2. Vikings to 3-3 at best (could be worse if most of their d-line gets suspensions). The key is to the Packers beating the Bears at Soldier Field. That would leave the Packers with the head-to-head tiebreaker (or hope for a common opponent tiebreaker).
3 of the opponents are common to both. The Bears have the Vikings and Rams, while the Packers have the Panthers and Lions--one fair team and one rotten team for each--so far, all even.
The Bears other game is against the Packers--while the Packers other game is the Bears. I say, that one is easier for the Packers. With everything else a wash, that head to head game makes the Packers schedule easier.
The Bears have an advantage in that they get to play the Pack at home. That's a big diff with a 6 game slate left. We also have some games that could go either way. The Jags and the Texans could a buzz saw or push-overs depending on the emotional set of those teams.
I think we eventually go on to win the North. One huge factor is Gus Frerotte. He played here in Cincy 5 years ago, or so. He came on like the second coming of Dan Marino. In six or seven games, the guy had fallen apart so bad, he basically couldn't even play. That game he had in Washington where he ran into a wall and knocked himself out wasn't a fluke. Frerotte does that all the time. Starts like a house afire, then crumbles until you have to bench him.
That's one reason we will take it, I feel. ARod has shown himself to be the best QB in the division. His play should be the factor that gives us the North crown.
Comment
-
I have to agree with this. I love getting excited about our first dominate performance by our Oline, but its hard to get too excited with the other games still fresh in my mind. They've played okay for some games but they were dreadful against Dal, Atl, TB, and MN. Now, all of a sudden they are dominate. What are the chances they can keep it up? They are living and dying by the OLine play this year. I am not confident yet.Originally posted by The LeaperUntil our OL plays more than 1 game in a row of good football, I'll withhold judgment.Fred's Slacks is a Winner!
Comment

Comment