Originally posted by oregonpackfan
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Studs and Duds - Week 11
Collapse
X
-
I agree OPF. He looked good yesterday. The INT was just a poor throw, ball slipped, didn't get his footing, something. It wasn't poor judgment as it would have been 6 points had he put something on it.Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
-
You would have a point here, if indeed, the CB had played outside leverage. But the replays (3 or 4 times, Aikman was insistent on going back to it) showed the CB with inside technique. He failed to diagnose Jennings route early enough and the throw was so quick, he had no time to react. Good route, and good throw.Originally posted by ThunderDanThe touchdown to Jennings was good recognition only. Jennings was in man coverage 15 yards away from anyone. The CB had outside leverage so Jennings ran inside and Rodgers hit him.
And you cannot assume a TD, just like in baseball you cannot assume a double play when considering an error. Too many other things need to happen. There is a reason QB percentages go down when you throw deeper.
Doesn't mean that he was a stud in the game, but its not a bad play. McCarthy clearly wants him to take the checkdown on certain reads. And like a young player should, he is listening to the coach. This is both good and bad. It prevents turnovers, but it can also stop drives when the checkdown is well short of first down yardage.
My guess is that McCarthy is relying on a statistical analysis that tells him that the average loss of field position (on a turnover) is much worse than the failure of 3rd down. Over the course of a season, this is likely very true. However, like the Viking game, there will come a time we need the first down no matter what, and then the checkdown is out the door. He will get riskier. And perhaps we need a smaller faster H back type who can make the LB miss on those checkdowns.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Favre last beat them at Lambeau in 2003 (34-21). The Pack also beat the Bears in GB in 2002.Originally posted by Iron MikeThose fans need to realize that Favre hadn't beaten the Bears at Lambeau since 2001. That's six consecutive defeats.Originally posted by oregonpackfanAre so many Packer fans still in the "Favre Withdrawal Mode" that they have to complain about any shortcoming Rodgers might have?!
Rodgers accomplished it his first time around.
Comment
-
Well, he named just about everybody on the team (RB, the WRs, the OL, the defense, the kicker, and Jason Hunter). It's obviously not just for players who played "perfect." Do you really think 23 players deserved mention over Rodgers on the stud list? I don't.Originally posted by channthemanSorta. Isn't that the point of the stud list? The guys who blew you away and dominated? Rodgers missed a few too many throws and especially that pass where he really underthrew Driver that was intercepted. Man that was an ugly play. Still he wasn't on the duds list which I agree with. He was good but not a stud today. Too many missed opportunities."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
The Tundra Tailgate Area absolutely sucks. I know the Packers are making money by creating that “experience” for the pre-game but it causes huge crowd flow issues. If you tailgate before the game at the Stadium View and walk past the Resch center to enter the stadium it is now a complete bottleneck.
Have you entered the Oneida Nation Gate at all this year prior to this game? I'm just curious because this was the first game that I've seen it bottle-necked like this, too. Went in through this gate for the MN and Atlanta games and it went fairly smooth. ALL the gates had longer lines and it's to be expected for colder games when security has more layers of clothing and blankets being carried in, etc.
Personally, I think the Tundra Tailgate area is awesome. That's where we were before the game yesterday, too and we had a great time.
Comment
-
Really? Cuz I saw a RB who does fine in wide open spaces but would drop as soon as contact was made. BJax delivered more punishment on his few runs than Grant did all day. I highly doubt Grant will be the guy at RB for many years to come. Put him down as a stud for this game I guess but he has likely been the biggest dud of this season IMO.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersI think he took and gave some punishment.Originally posted by The GunshooterRyan Grant ran so hard and the o-line keep Chicago out of the backfield. I wish he would deliver some punishment to the safety though instead of taking it.

Comment
-
You stupid bastards kill me. Anyone want to tell me why there are no left handed shortstops in the bigs?? Same reason coaches teach a QB to scramble to his right whenever possible.Originally posted by The GunshooterThat's right, when the dumb bastard learns to scramble left as much as he scrambles right and quits trying to hit guys over the shoulder on a line he will be a stud. He had all day back there to hit wide open receivers. I don't even remember him getting touched today.Originally posted by ThunderDanHarvey-Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWho is E. Homer?
Rodgers = STUD
Like any QB will make every throw. Good God. You want to talk about what ifs? What if Lee had caught that perfect throw for a TD? Then, you are looking at 24 for 30 for 240 yards and 3 TDs. People cream themselves when other QBs play that well. Different standard for this QB.
It's me.
Rodgers does not go on the stud list. He missed two sure touchdowns. In a close game that's the difference between winning and losing. You can't miss a guy wide open running down the middle because you are afraid of the blitz. He's going to get blitzed his whole career. Next year I think he will be comfortable enough with the blitz pick ups to make the throw he should have.
I didn't add or subtract from Rodgers performance for Lee's drop.
Now there is a brainteaser for all the intellectuals who have made that same assinine point several times over the last couple weeks. Think long and hard about it and realize that you actually said it enough times to make me waste my time responding.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
The important thing to note with Grant is improvement. We have faced three top 10 rushing defenses in the last three weeks and Grant has shown steady improvement against all three. He was regularly generating 5 yards after contact yesterday and showed toughness by coming back strong after having the wind knocked out of him.Originally posted by MadtownPackerReally? Cuz I saw a RB who does fine in wide open spaces but would drop as soon as contact was made. BJax delivered more punishment on his few runs than Grant did all day. I highly doubt Grant will be the guy at RB for many years to come. Put him down as a stud for this game I guess but he has likely been the biggest dud of this season IMO.
You're absolutely right that he had been a dud for the first half of the season, but he's coming on strong in the second half and looks to be a significant asset heading in to the playoff race.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MadtownPackerReally? Cuz I saw a RB who does fine in wide open spaces but would drop as soon as contact was made. BJax delivered more punishment on his few runs than Grant did all day. I highly doubt Grant will be the guy at RB for many years to come. Put him down as a stud for this game I guess but he has likely been the biggest dud of this season IMO.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersI think he took and gave some punishment.Originally posted by The GunshooterRyan Grant ran so hard and the o-line keep Chicago out of the backfield. I wish he would deliver some punishment to the safety though instead of taking it.

I respect your opinion Mad, but IMO this is a very poor observation. 80% of Grant's yards come after contact. I can't find how many he had against Chicago exactly, but I know it was well over 100. The whole team was raving about it. In Minnesota last week, 71 of his 89 yards came after contact - he would have had a lot more had MM not given up on the run.
To everyone complaining about Grant not producing like a top 10 RB in the league after recieving the contract he got, note that right now Grant is 11th in rushing in the NFL. He's rushed for more yards than certain elite RB's with names like LaDanian Tomlinson and Steven Jackson, with just about equal yards per carry. He's having a pretty good year, all things considered. He's not Clinton Portis or Adrian Peterson, but I never expected him to be - especially in a generally pass happy offense called by MM. I guess I have a hard time calling him the biggest dud of the season.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
I'd say he's been a disappointment, but I think it mainly was due to his injury and no practice time in camp. I've felt he's been back to normal for about the past 4 weeks. I expect him to continue to have a big second half."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
It's only a disappointment if you are using last season as a barometer. Even most elite RB's don't get 100 yards in every game like Grant did last season, so IMO that's an unfair expectation. RB's IMO can only be judged fairly over the course of a full season. This season Grant is on pace to reach over 1200 yards, a fair expectation for most RB's in the NFL. I wouldn't be disappointed by that at all.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersI'd say he's been a disappointment, but I think it mainly was due to his injury and no practice time in camp. I've felt he's been back to normal for about the past 4 weeks. I expect him to continue to have a big second half.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
He didn't get 100 yards in every game last year. He got 100 yards in 5 of 10 regular season games and 1 of 2 playoff games.
In his first 6 games this year, he only looked decent in two of them--regardless of stats. He was missing holes. He wasn't breaking tackles. He was averaging 3.5 yards/carry--which is pathetic. He's gotten back to what he was the last 3 or 4 games. He looked below average the first 6 weeks. I think it's because he wasn't healthy."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Really? I haven't seen it for 4. I've certainly seen it the past two, though. He looks fast again, finally. He hits the hole very hard.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersI'd say he's been a disappointment, but I think it mainly was due to his injury and no practice time in camp. I've felt he's been back to normal for about the past 4 weeks. I expect him to continue to have a big second half.
On the plus side, did anyone notice how much harder and faster BJack is hitting the hole? At least yesterday, he looked very similiar to Grant. Last year, he looked like he was running through mudd. He has made a ton of progress as a player this year.
I agree the issue was his health, which also probably stems back to missing camp.
Boiga, I doubt much of it has to do with technique. These guys have been running for years. My guess is he couldn't get as low because of the injury.
Comment
-
Health was only part of it though. His technique has improved a lot over the course of the season as well. He's stepping higher, keeping his shoulder pads lower, and making better decisions in the last three games.
Holding out over the off season and the injury that sidelined him in training camp hurt his preparedness and it's taken a while to get his head back in the game.
Comment
-
First base doesn't move douchebag. If the defense has to guard against it, it makes Rodgers that much more effective and he can do it well. Favre made a killing with it.Originally posted by bobbleheadYou stupid bastards kill me. Anyone want to tell me why there are no left handed shortstops in the bigs?? Same reason coaches teach a QB to scramble to his right whenever possible.Originally posted by The GunshooterThat's right, when the dumb bastard learns to scramble left as much as he scrambles right and quits trying to hit guys over the shoulder on a line he will be a stud. He had all day back there to hit wide open receivers. I don't even remember him getting touched today.Originally posted by ThunderDanHarvey-Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWho is E. Homer?
Rodgers = STUD
Like any QB will make every throw. Good God. You want to talk about what ifs? What if Lee had caught that perfect throw for a TD? Then, you are looking at 24 for 30 for 240 yards and 3 TDs. People cream themselves when other QBs play that well. Different standard for this QB.
It's me.
Rodgers does not go on the stud list. He missed two sure touchdowns. In a close game that's the difference between winning and losing. You can't miss a guy wide open running down the middle because you are afraid of the blitz. He's going to get blitzed his whole career. Next year I think he will be comfortable enough with the blitz pick ups to make the throw he should have.
I didn't add or subtract from Rodgers performance for Lee's drop.
Now there is a brainteaser for all the intellectuals who have made that same assinine point several times over the last couple weeks. Think long and hard about it and realize that you actually said it enough times to make me waste my time responding.
Comment


Comment