If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Too bad, I really thought he was going to be a great player. I remember when he and Greenway were at Iowa. Greenway was a great player, but everyone always thought that Hodge was the unsung hero to his success.
Hodge was a tweener in the pro's. If he could pick up cover, he could be a regular player. He couldn't, so he's a back-up LB.
He was a marginal ST guy, probably because he had little experience at it.
He may still be a decent back-up, but you'd think most teams would like to put a kid they are trying to develop in that spot.
He was a good kid, but very limited. The guy could fill like crazy, but that was it.
I think you're selling him short. He hit way harder than Barnett and he was equally mobile. I wonder what Hodge turns into, if he is drafted and thrown into the position like Barnett once was by Shermie. Barnett was disgusting his rookie year as we all remember. Our own Wist was on his back his first 3 seasons. Only last year did we see anything really good (not great) from Barnett.
So, think about that, KY. Think about Hodge getting the same shot as Barnett when he came to the Pack and tell me again, Hodge was a dud. Cause, I just don't believe it.
I think you're selling him short. He hit way harder than Barnett and he was equally mobile.
Nah, Barnett is one of the fastest LBs in the league. Hodge has below average speed. He hits harder than most LBs, but he's relatively slow. I don't think the injuries helped him in that regard either.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Hodge has below average speed. He hits harder than most LBs, but he's relatively slow. I don't think the injuries helped him in that regard either.
See, I read this all the time, but, during the pre-season, I didn't see this. He may be brittle, but he was game fast, from what I saw. I'm no expert, but I wanted him in G&G.
Hodge has below average speed. He hits harder than most LBs, but he's relatively slow. I don't think the injuries helped him in that regard either.
See, I read this all the time, but, during the pre-season, I didn't see this. He may be brittle, but he was game fast, from what I saw. I'm no expert, but I wanted him in G&G.
This board discussed this after the last preseason game, when Hodge and Bishop looked to have their jobs on the line. On several plays, Bishop blew past Hodge on his way to the ball carrier, and Barnett is faster than Bishop. Hodge is relatively slow, especially for a smallish linebacker.
Hodge was a tweener in the pro's. If he could pick up cover, he could be a regular player. He couldn't, so he's a back-up LB.
He was a marginal ST guy, probably because he had little experience at it.
He may still be a decent back-up, but you'd think most teams would like to put a kid they are trying to develop in that spot.
He was a good kid, but very limited. The guy could fill like crazy, but that was it.
I think you're selling him short. He hit way harder than Barnett and he was equally mobile. I wonder what Hodge turns into, if he is drafted and thrown into the position like Barnett once was by Shermie. Barnett was disgusting his rookie year as we all remember. Our own Wist was on his back his first 3 seasons. Only last year did we see anything really good (not great) from Barnett.
So, think about that, KY. Think about Hodge getting the same shot as Barnett when he came to the Pack and tell me again, Hodge was a dud. Cause, I just don't believe it.
Man, I missed your response.
You shudda pmed me and told me what a chickenshit I was not to respond!
I'll say one thing about Hodge. He had a rabid fan club.
Hodge getting the same shot as Barnett when he came to the Pack ?
I really believe he wouldn't have hacked the program.
One way or the other, he's in our team's rear view mirror now. If he's such a red hot LB, wouldn't the Bengals gave him a little play when he went over there?
They lost their #1 pick at Mike (Keith Rivers) and never gave Hodge a glance at MLB. He played more spec teams for Cincy and didn't really stand out at that job. He's a little small and a little slow, with poor cover skills. Barnett is head and shoulders a much better player than Abdul is.
I'm glad he only tore a tricep. Another leg hurt might have put him out forever. More work, and he might develop the skills to play in the league. he's gotta learn to cover, especially the way the league is now.
Hodge getting the same shot as Barnett when he came to the Pack ?
I really believe he wouldn't have hacked the program.
One way or the other, he's in our team's rear view mirror now. If he's such a red hot LB, wouldn't the Bengals gave him a little play when he went over there?
They lost their #1 pick at Mike (Keith Rivers) and never gave Hodge a glance at MLB. He played more spec teams for Cincy and didn't really stand out at that job. He's a little small and a little slow, with poor cover skills. Barnett is head and shoulders a much better player than Abdul is.
I'm glad he only tore a tricep. Another leg hurt might have put him out forever. More work, and he might develop the skills to play in the league. he's gotta learn to cover, especially the way the league is now.
I think if he was thrown into Mike his first year, like Barnett, we see a perennial pro bowler outta Hodge. I know he's small, but I believe the guy has heart. OK. I'll have to give you his injuries.
Barnett was sheit when he entered the league. I was always defending him against a rabid Wist43.
I truly believe, barring injuries, Hodge, given the same shot at it as Barnett, would be the superior Mike. Just my opinion. And, Harv, piss off right now!
Comment