Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Numbers Game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Numbers Game

    Since Patler's been slacking I'll throw one out.

    5

    and

    +1
    Originally posted by 3irty1
    This is museum quality stupidity.

  • #2
    One question or two related questions?

    Comment


    • #3
      2 seperate questions, but related.
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      This is museum quality stupidity.

      Comment


      • #4
        Does 5 have anything to do with the number of wins and/or losses the Packers have this year?
        Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Numbers Game

          Originally posted by Zool
          Since Patler's been slacking I'll throw one out.

          5

          and

          +1
          Since you have specified the second answer as "+1" that part is obviously a "+/-", "for/against" or other comparative question. Since this is a Packer board I will assume it is Packer related in some way. So, the Packers have, or a Packer player has 5 of something, which is 1 more than the opponents have of the same thing.

          Hmmm..... thinking....thinking......thinking....thinking.... . thinking....thinking.....thinking....thinking....s till thinking.....

          Comment


          • #6
            nick collins

            Comment


            • #7
              2 packers players have 5 INTs

              which is +1 from 2nd place
              I am better looking than you.

              Comment


              • #8
                Crap again. Always check your work kids.

                First number should be 5.4.

                I apologize for the minutes of pondering lost.
                Originally posted by 3irty1
                This is museum quality stupidity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  5.4 will relate to something great about the Packers.

                  Then someone will comment about how much fun this was and the next response will be +1.
                  All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Zool
                    Crap again. Always check your work kids.

                    First number should be 5.4.

                    I apologize for the minutes of pondering lost.

                    MOM!!! Zool cheated! He changed the answer!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      5.4 is the avg amount of points the Packers have lost by this season

                      +1 is the turnover differential for the Packers in the 5 losses.

                      Its surprising how many times we've won the turnover battle and lost the game.
                      Originally posted by 3irty1
                      This is museum quality stupidity.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Zool
                        5.4 is the avg amount of points the Packers have lost by this season

                        +1 is the turnover differential for the Packers in the 5 losses.

                        Its surprising how many times we've won the turnover battle and lost the game.
                        That is quite suprising when taken at face value, but when we figure in the lack of run defense and the inability for the most part to keep our QB on his feet it makes sense. Credit Aaron Rodgers for not turning the ball over, thus keeping us in games, but if we can't block and can't tackle we aren't going to win many games regardless of the turnover differential.
                        Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X