Made a topic a month ago as to what's the deal with Ryan Grant, but even after a "good" game last week vs. the Bears, he still seems lackluster from what we and TT (gonna give you a big deal even though you are 3 years removed from FA, but hey we locked down 1 year of UFA with this 'great' deal) thought last year.
I watched that game with Bear and Packer buddies and his one run early over 20 yards was his first since very early vs. the Vikes and DAMN if it didn't look like he lost a step from last years breakaway Grant. Dude is noticeably slower than last year (nothing to do with the line).
Snake's Take:
Grant is an average NFL starting RB. No more, no less. Did he seem special last year, YES. But it's funny reading all these reports the last month from NFL scouting pro's giving their takes saying he may not be a top 50 RB in the NFL. I'm not paid to access as such, but I agree that is fair.
I'm not hating on Grant, but expected much more, it's almost as if the curse of the big contract (ala Freeman) has broached yet another "playmaker". I for one have advocated he allocate those funds to Jennings before the year before he reached unpayable levels to TT's realm.
I'm not saying Grant's deal was a dealbreaker for others, but damn if he gets 1250 years (his pace is 1258) he gets all kinds of guaran-damn-tees locked up. I for one like B-Jack right now (shows a burst and catches the ball for more than 5 for 14 yards over 10 games).
So how do we rectify this? Poll. OK. Thoughts?
I watched that game with Bear and Packer buddies and his one run early over 20 yards was his first since very early vs. the Vikes and DAMN if it didn't look like he lost a step from last years breakaway Grant. Dude is noticeably slower than last year (nothing to do with the line).
Snake's Take:
Grant is an average NFL starting RB. No more, no less. Did he seem special last year, YES. But it's funny reading all these reports the last month from NFL scouting pro's giving their takes saying he may not be a top 50 RB in the NFL. I'm not paid to access as such, but I agree that is fair.
I'm not hating on Grant, but expected much more, it's almost as if the curse of the big contract (ala Freeman) has broached yet another "playmaker". I for one have advocated he allocate those funds to Jennings before the year before he reached unpayable levels to TT's realm.
I'm not saying Grant's deal was a dealbreaker for others, but damn if he gets 1250 years (his pace is 1258) he gets all kinds of guaran-damn-tees locked up. I for one like B-Jack right now (shows a burst and catches the ball for more than 5 for 14 yards over 10 games).
So how do we rectify this? Poll. OK. Thoughts?


Comment