Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

""MISSING ELEMENT""

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by sheepshead
    Originally posted by cpk1994
    Your last statement sums it up perfectly. As I have said before, McGinn may be knowledageable but he is still an idiot.


    If your response is becasue I blasted McGinn without realizing Silverstein wrote the article, I realize my mistake. But if your response was about McGinn, could you explain?

    Comment


    • #17
      I read that yesterday. Mostly disagree with this piece.

      Yes, I can see the validity of BF's presence and play causing others to want to lift their game. Having a Joe Montana or John Elway on your team would've had the same effect.

      But there are others on this team that can and should take that mantle regardless if BF stayed retired or was traded.

      These are young, impressionable players (relatively speaking). Favre's leadership by example on the field would help. Well, the training wheels come off. Now you have to show you can lead. This situation would have happened next season or 2010 depending on when BF retired.

      Even though Favre had leadership on the field. He failed at least the last 2-3 offseasons when he could've quelled all this waffling crap.

      Teams do have to have some clue on what's coming up in their future, so they can draft accordingly. If BFs ego couldn't handle it, then too bad.

      As I've said before, I know the dregs GB had at QB before BF fell into our laps. He helped resurrect this team back to respectability. But the deification of him makes me wretch.

      TT has a tough off season ahead. He has used FA before to get CWood and Pickett. He needs to start drafting players that are ready to plug in now. No Poppinga projects, no permanent rookie season inactives, etc.
      -digital dean

      No "TROLLS" allowed!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Pacopete4
        blah, blah, blah TT fans... haha


        shit is hilarious... it really took this long for this story to happen? Its not Arod Bashing season... its douche bag, snake, TT bashing season.... the guy is a fuckin clown, snake, fag..... douche GM that needs to rot in hell.............. Love u Brett and I hate u veteran guys who TT selected on this team who couldnt handle the burden of the Favre aura.. FUCK YOU TED THOMPSON!
        If I were any player on the team and people implied I needed brett favre to do my job well I would be seriously offended. Do you really believe that Guys like Harris and Woodsen need a washed up me first QB to be inspired? Its natural for someone to write this article and its natural for others to hop on board. Bottom line is that ARods onfield production is every bit as good as BF's....even better than I ever expected.

        Do we forget the 8-20 stretch we went thru before a strong finish in '06 and a cake '07 schedule? Do we ignore the 4th Quarter leads that Arod has given us that the Defense has blown and honestly think they would have held the lead if old number 4 were the QB?

        Seriously, I know it feels good to make this arguement, but it makes as much sense as giving a bunch of money to a business that has proven time and again it can't compete in the market place because "their leadership inspires the american people".
        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          Originally posted by sheepshead
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          Your last statement sums it up perfectly. As I have said before, McGinn may be knowledageable but he is still an idiot.


          If your response is becasue I blasted McGinn without realizing Silverstein wrote the article, I realize my mistake. But if your response was about McGinn, could you explain?
          For my 2 cents mcginn is brilliant. If you look back 6 months you will see his predictions often come true.
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by cpk1994
            Originally posted by sheepshead
            Originally posted by cpk1994
            Your last statement sums it up perfectly. As I have said before, McGinn may be knowledageable but he is still an idiot.


            If your response is becasue I blasted McGinn without realizing Silverstein wrote the article, I realize my mistake. But if your response was about McGinn, could you explain?
            Yu mispelled knoolegable and called him a ideott.
            Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by bobblehead
              Originally posted by cpk1994
              Originally posted by sheepshead
              Originally posted by cpk1994
              Your last statement sums it up perfectly. As I have said before, McGinn may be knowledageable but he is still an idiot.


              If your response is becasue I blasted McGinn without realizing Silverstein wrote the article, I realize my mistake. But if your response was about McGinn, could you explain?
              For my 2 cents mcginn is brilliant. If you look back 6 months you will see his predictions often come true.

              McGinn wins many awards and IMO is a very solid writer who always has a slanted point. Many of his points are spot on down the line but he always gets blasted by those who do not agree with him
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                haha. Again, it's not that the defense is bad, it's taht they're not inspired by Brett Favre.

                This stuff is really too much sometimes. Are we living a dream where stuff like this can be written in the Milwaukee Journel Sentinel and people acctually buy it?

                I thought Ruvell said it best at the end but damn, this story was clearly a drama piece intended to stir the pot and sell papers.
                You tell me then, guy. Did Ryan Pickett get old overnight? Did Johnny Jolly forget how to play? What about Pop, AJ and Nick? Did they all work out too hard and lose their speed?

                You can have an excuse for one guy... maybe two. But when you start making them for the whole team something is clearly wrong.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by MJZiggy
                  Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                  haha. Again, it's not that the defense is bad, it's taht they're not inspired by Brett Favre.

                  This stuff is really too much sometimes. Are we living a dream where stuff like this can be written in the Milwaukee Journel Sentinel and people acctually buy it?

                  I thought Ruvell said it best at the end but damn, this story was clearly a drama piece intended to stir the pot and sell papers.
                  Yes. Ruvell was right. Just because the team is young doesn't mean it has no leadership. You wanna tell me that Al and Charles never do anything to inspire the younger players? I'm sure Tauscher and Clifton have never said a single word or led by example.

                  What a crock of shit.
                  No, I don't think those guys are leaders. Chuck is very quiet, doesn't stay here in the off-season (this was his first year, etc). Al Harris maybe, but again, not so sure.

                  Tauscher and Clifton? Really? Two tackles?

                  IMO, leadership naturally comes with the MLB position and the QB position. Barnett is the only leader we have imo.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    Originally posted by MJZiggy
                    Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                    haha. Again, it's not that the defense is bad, it's taht they're not inspired by Brett Favre.

                    This stuff is really too much sometimes. Are we living a dream where stuff like this can be written in the Milwaukee Journel Sentinel and people acctually buy it?

                    I thought Ruvell said it best at the end but damn, this story was clearly a drama piece intended to stir the pot and sell papers.
                    Yes. Ruvell was right. Just because the team is young doesn't mean it has no leadership. You wanna tell me that Al and Charles never do anything to inspire the younger players? I'm sure Tauscher and Clifton have never said a single word or led by example.

                    What a crock of shit.
                    No, I don't think those guys are leaders. Chuck is very quiet, doesn't stay here in the off-season (this was his first year, etc). Al Harris maybe, but again, not so sure.

                    Tauscher and Clifton? Really? Two tackles?

                    IMO, leadership naturally comes with the MLB position and the QB position. Barnett is the only leader we have imo.
                    Leadership comes from anyone who is willing to step up and be a leader... It doesn't have to be a MLB or a QB.

                    By the way, it's an incredible cop out to blame the failure of the defense on a guy who never played a single snap on defense his entire career. Perhaps you could blame the DC, or maybe the players themselves. Blaming the Favre deal is just an easy way explaining away the real problems of this team. Quarterback isn't one of them.
                    Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Partial
                      Originally posted by MJZiggy
                      Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                      haha. Again, it's not that the defense is bad, it's taht they're not inspired by Brett Favre.

                      This stuff is really too much sometimes. Are we living a dream where stuff like this can be written in the Milwaukee Journel Sentinel and people acctually buy it?

                      I thought Ruvell said it best at the end but damn, this story was clearly a drama piece intended to stir the pot and sell papers.
                      Yes. Ruvell was right. Just because the team is young doesn't mean it has no leadership. You wanna tell me that Al and Charles never do anything to inspire the younger players? I'm sure Tauscher and Clifton have never said a single word or led by example.

                      What a crock of shit.
                      No, I don't think those guys are leaders. Chuck is very quiet, doesn't stay here in the off-season (this was his first year, etc). Al Harris maybe, but again, not so sure.

                      Tauscher and Clifton? Really? Two tackles?

                      IMO, leadership naturally comes with the MLB position and the QB position. Barnett is the only leader we have imo.
                      Imagine that. We need someone to step up and lead and Woodson shows up for the offseason stuff...Hmmm...
                      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Imagine that, the announcers today saying that guys on the defense (namely Woodson) stepping up and showing their leadership.
                        "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          TED (INFAMY) THOMPSON wrecked the pack...!!!
                          They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

                          Brew Crew in 2011!!!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            How many times during the years did you listen to other players in the league talk about “the element” of Favre?

                            How many times did you hear, “the Packers are never out of a game with Favre”?

                            How many times have you read articles from players saying playing with Favre made everyone on the team play at a higher level….and not wanting to disappoint?

                            To say that he didn’t bring a level of confidence (“the element”) to the whole team is just silly and people that believe that is not PART of what is missing this year are just in denial…IMO.

                            It’s Brett Favre for Christ’s sake! No way there was going to be a transition to a new QB, any QB, that didn’t skip a beat…no way.

                            BTW, I support Rodgers and hope he is a star for the Packers. But to completely deny some of the truth of the article posted is just plain old denial IMO. Seems some people were just spoiled by what Favre brought to the game.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy
                              Imagine that, the announcers today saying that guys on the defense (namely Woodson) stepping up and showing their leadership.
                              So much leadership with yet another sloppy offensive performance, relying on the defense to bail them out yet again, don'tcha say?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Partial
                                Originally posted by MJZiggy
                                Imagine that, the announcers today saying that guys on the defense (namely Woodson) stepping up and showing their leadership.
                                So much leadership with yet another sloppy offensive performance, relying on the defense to bail them out yet again, don'tcha say?
                                They didn't rely on the defense to bail them out. They took the lead and relied on the defense to make a stop and AGAIN the defense gave up a big play and allowed them to score easily.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X