Is AR like a hot chic that

[rbaloha1]

performs poorly in bed? Meaning will AR always have great stats but unable to lead the Packers to big wins?

Your comments Packers Nation?

[cpk1994]

Re: Is AR like a hot chic that

performs poorly in bed? Meaning will AR always have great stats but unable to lead the Packers to big wins?

Your comments Packers Nation?

YOu know you are asking for trouble with that loaded question don't you?

Anyway, I would say no. This is only his first year of starter. You have to have patience.

[bobblehead]

Re: Is AR like a hot chic that

performs poorly in bed? Meaning will AR always have great stats but unable to lead the Packers to big wins?

Your comments Packers Nation?

Does the hot chic have a brother who plays atrocious defense??

[Partial]

I'm sorry, but this is his 13th game starting, and he has appeared in games over the course of 4 seasons.

That first year starter balogna is just that.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I'm sorry, but this is his 13th game starting, and he has appeared in games over the course of 4 seasons.

That first year starter balogna is just that.

In his prior three seasons, he played the equivalent of two full games. He had an advantage of learning the system, but the facts are he IS a first year starter and he had VERY LITTLE game experience coming into the season.

Now, tell me again how we average under 20 offensive points/game?

[LL2]

People need to lay off Arod for a while. He's not the one that stunk up the joint. Would you rather have Brees, Rivers, Cutler, or Quinn? Those guys are pretty good QB's but none have won when it counts in the playoffs.

[bobblehead]

I'm sorry, but this is his 13th game starting, and he has appeared in games over the course of 4 seasons.

That first year starter balogna is just that.

Agreed, its bologna, his stats are nearly IDENTICAL to Peyton Mannings. He has the 9th overall ranking. He has 23 TD's and 12 picks despite a spotty running game and OL. His stats pretty much bury Favre's. He has shown good mobility and rushed for TD's and first downs. He has led the 5th scoring offense in the NFL with the 21st rushing game and a defense that gives up the 9th most yards in the NFL.

Yet despite all this I gotta read posts like yours because you got serious fucking wood for Brett Favre. He is gone. If he stayed he would be in his last season...maybe, we would have to go thru the drama again to find out. He made his own bed. MOST Of us are packer fans and want to honestly discuss the packers. Having to defend a QB that is playing really fucking good is getting really fucking old. I'm going to make my own thread wasting time. I'm going to blame Tramon Williams for the defensive collapse and praise Jarret Bush because last year our Defense was a lot better when Bush was the nickel than it is this year with Tramon there. That makes sense...at least according to a lot of posters here.

[bobblehead]

People need to lay off Arod for a while. He's not the one that stunk up the joint. Would you rather have Brees, Rivers, Cutler, or Quinn? Those guys are pretty good QB's but none have won when it counts in the playoffs.

What is Brees and Rivers combined win totals? Rivers must really suck since his team is below .500 and it is a very talented roster....whats that? He is the top rated QB in the NFL...doesn't matter, sub .500 he sucks.

[channtheman]

People need to lay off Arod for a while. He's not the one that stunk up the joint. Would you rather have Brees, Rivers, Cutler, or Quinn? Those guys are pretty good QB's but none have won when it counts in the playoffs.

What is Brees and Rivers combined win totals? Rivers must really suck since his team is below .500 and it is a very talented roster....whats that? He is the top rated QB in the NFL...doesn't matter, sub .500 he sucks.

Good point. All these guys suck. Obviously it is his fault and has nothing else to do with anything. I some people's logic, Favre was only good for one season when he led us to the Super Bowl victory. You know the only thing that matters is Super Bowl wins. And Favre rode the defense for that Super Bowl.

[dissident94]

Again who brought up favre. Again we cannot touch Rodgers. You guys are the one bringing up Favre. No one else. A-Rod has flaws. There are reason to be concerned and it has nothing to do with Brett Favre. For gods sake leave Favre out of the argument for once.

There is some relevance to the point. Rodgers may put up huge numbers and look great (Jeff George ring a bell) but never deliver in the clutch. Until he does at least one frickin time it will be a concern

[Partial]

I'm sorry, but this is his 13th game starting, and he has appeared in games over the course of 4 seasons.

That first year starter balogna is just that.

Agreed, its bologna, his stats are nearly IDENTICAL to Peyton Mannings. He has the 9th overall ranking. He has 23 TD's and 12 picks despite a spotty running game and OL. His stats pretty much bury Favre's. He has shown good mobility and rushed for TD's and first downs. He has led the 5th scoring offense in the NFL with the 21st rushing game and a defense that gives up the 9th most yards in the NFL.

Yet despite all this I gotta read posts like yours because you got serious fucking wood for Brett Favre. He is gone. If he stayed he would be in his last season...maybe, we would have to go thru the drama again to find out. He made his own bed. MOST Of us are packer fans and want to honestly discuss the packers. Having to defend a QB that is playing really fucking good is getting really fucking old. I'm going to make my own thread wasting time. I'm going to blame Tramon Williams for the defensive collapse and praise Jarret Bush because last year our Defense was a lot better when Bush was the nickel than it is this year with Tramon there. That makes sense...at least according to a lot of posters here.

Wood for Brett Favre, hardly. I'm not comparing him at all to Brett Favre.. thats really unfair as Brett Favre is probably the best QB to play the game.

He's playing OK. He's playing like Chad Pennington. I have explained this numerous times. It's not just his fault, its also MMs for the poor play calling.

Aaron is playing in between 12 to 17 (middle tier, below the elite playmakers and then the second tier of very good qbs) in the QB rankings in my head. If thats all he ends up being, the Pack had better move on, because the QB position is too important to stick with a middle of the road guy.

1. Manning
2. Brady
3. Roethlisberger
4. Manning
5. Romo
6. Hasselbeck
7. Cutler
8. Palmer
9. Ryan
10. Rivers
11. Brees
12. McNabb

Not in any order, those guys are better quarterbacks when healthy right now than Rodgers. Sure, the stats may not tell the tale, but Rodgers is on a STACKED team (2nd best in league last year) coming off an overtime loss in the conference championship to the eventual world champions.

He's playing alright, like I have said. He has all the potential in the world, as I have acknowledged time and time again. Where is the Favre wood, exactly?

Rodgers is outplaying Favre right now. No doubt about it. But, Favre brings a lot more to the table, which is evident by the record of the team this year. Favre is pretty much done.

You guys are homers. Plain and simple. It's very evident to me that he is average, and while having a big name doesn't necessarily mean you're playing big... the guys above outside of McNabb (injured), Palmer(injured) and Hass(injured, awful team) are playing great.

Some of those guys are even on worse teams (Ryan), and getting the job done with less in their ROOKIE year (read: not 4th year in the league).

If this says Brett Favre boner to you, well, I think you have other issues. But I watch a lot of football, have a pretty accurate eye for talent, and can plain as day see that these QBs are better today than Rodgers.

[sheepshead]

Re: Is AR like a hot chic that

performs poorly in bed? Meaning will AR always have great stats but unable to lead the Packers to big wins?

Your comments Packers Nation?

Yes, cut him now.

[Fritz]

Re: Is AR like a hot chic that

performs poorly in bed? Meaning will AR always have great stats but unable to lead the Packers to big wins?

Your comments Packers Nation?

Arod is like a young, hot chick who has only had sex a couple of times. And Rodgers seems willing to learn. So, to continue the analogy, if the young hot chick is eager to learn, she will soon be the goddess of the bedroom, a steamy, naughty, hot sex machine, and therefore, Arod will soon become the god of the football field, a hot winning quarterback.

[dissident94]

I'm sorry, but this is his 13th game starting, and he has appeared in games over the course of 4 seasons.

That first year starter balogna is just that.

Agreed, its bologna, his stats are nearly IDENTICAL to Peyton Mannings. He has the 9th overall ranking. He has 23 TD's and 12 picks despite a spotty running game and OL. His stats pretty much bury Favre's. He has shown good mobility and rushed for TD's and first downs. He has led the 5th scoring offense in the NFL with the 21st rushing game and a defense that gives up the 9th most yards in the NFL.

Yet despite all this I gotta read posts like yours because you got serious fucking wood for Brett Favre. He is gone. If he stayed he would be in his last season...maybe, we would have to go thru the drama again to find out. He made his own bed. MOST Of us are packer fans and want to honestly discuss the packers. Having to defend a QB that is playing really fucking good is getting really fucking old. I'm going to make my own thread wasting time. I'm going to blame Tramon Williams for the defensive collapse and praise Jarret Bush because last year our Defense was a lot better when Bush was the nickel than it is this year with Tramon there. That makes sense...at least according to a lot of posters here.

Wood for Brett Favre, hardly. I'm not comparing him at all to Brett Favre.. thats really unfair as Brett Favre is probably the best QB to play the game.

He's playing OK. He's playing like Chad Pennington. I have explained this numerous times. It's not just his fault, its also MMs for the poor play calling.

Aaron is playing in between 12 to 17 (middle tier, below the elite playmakers and then the second tier of very good qbs) in the QB rankings in my head. If thats all he ends up being, the Pack had better move on, because the QB position is too important to stick with a middle of the road guy.

1. Manning
2. Brady
3. Roethlisberger
4. Manning
5. Romo
6. Hasselbeck
7. Cutler
8. Palmer
9. Ryan
10. Rivers
11. Brees
12. McNabb

Not in any order, those guys are better quarterbacks when healthy right now than Rodgers. Sure, the stats may not tell the tale, but Rodgers is on a STACKED team (2nd best in league last year) coming off an overtime loss in the conference championship to the eventual world champions.

He's playing alright, like I have said. He has all the potential in the world, as I have acknowledged time and time again. Where is the Favre wood, exactly?

Rodgers is outplaying Favre right now. No doubt about it. But, Favre brings a lot more to the table, which is evident by the record of the team this year. Favre is pretty much done.

You guys are homers. Plain and simple. It's very evident to me that he is average, and while having a big name doesn't necessarily mean you're playing big... the guys above outside of McNabb (injured), Palmer(injured) and Hass(injured, awful team) are playing great.

Some of those guys are even on worse teams (Ryan), and getting the job done with less in their ROOKIE year (read: not 4th year in the league).

If this says Brett Favre boner to you, well, I think you have other issues. But I watch a lot of football, have a pretty accurate eye for talent, and can plain as day see that these QBs are better today than Rodgers.

The football fans I talk to that really watch the games outside of Green Bay do not have the same love for A-Rod as a see on this board.

What I see is people who maybe said Rodgers will be great, or whatever and now will not admit certain flaws in his game.

[billy_oliver880]

I'm sorry, but this is his 13th game starting, and he has appeared in games over the course of 4 seasons.

That first year starter balogna is just that.

Agreed, its bologna, his stats are nearly IDENTICAL to Peyton Mannings. He has the 9th overall ranking. He has 23 TD's and 12 picks despite a spotty running game and OL. His stats pretty much bury Favre's. He has shown good mobility and rushed for TD's and first downs. He has led the 5th scoring offense in the NFL with the 21st rushing game and a defense that gives up the 9th most yards in the NFL.

Yet despite all this I gotta read posts like yours because you got serious fucking wood for Brett Favre. He is gone. If he stayed he would be in his last season...maybe, we would have to go thru the drama again to find out. He made his own bed. MOST Of us are packer fans and want to honestly discuss the packers. Having to defend a QB that is playing really fucking good is getting really fucking old. I'm going to make my own thread wasting time. I'm going to blame Tramon Williams for the defensive collapse and praise Jarret Bush because last year our Defense was a lot better when Bush was the nickel than it is this year with Tramon there. That makes sense...at least according to a lot of posters here.

Wood for Brett Favre, hardly. I'm not comparing him at all to Brett Favre.. thats really unfair as Brett Favre is probably the best QB to play the game.

He's playing OK. He's playing like Chad Pennington. I have explained this numerous times. It's not just his fault, its also MMs for the poor play calling.

Aaron is playing in between 12 to 17 (middle tier, below the elite playmakers and then the second tier of very good qbs) in the QB rankings in my head. If thats all he ends up being, the Pack had better move on, because the QB position is too important to stick with a middle of the road guy.

1. Manning
2. Brady
3. Roethlisberger
4. Manning
5. Romo
6. Hasselbeck
7. Cutler
8. Palmer
9. Ryan
10. Rivers
11. Brees
12. McNabb

Not in any order, those guys are better quarterbacks when healthy right now than Rodgers. Sure, the stats may not tell the tale, but Rodgers is on a STACKED team (2nd best in league last year) coming off an overtime loss in the conference championship to the eventual world champions.

He's playing alright, like I have said. He has all the potential in the world, as I have acknowledged time and time again. Where is the Favre wood, exactly?

Rodgers is outplaying Favre right now. No doubt about it. But, Favre brings a lot more to the table, which is evident by the record of the team this year. Favre is pretty much done.

You guys are homers. Plain and simple. It's very evident to me that he is average, and while having a big name doesn't necessarily mean you're playing big... the guys above outside of McNabb (injured), Palmer(injured) and Hass(injured, awful team) are playing great.

Some of those guys are even on worse teams (Ryan), and getting the job done with less in their ROOKIE year (read: not 4th year in the league).

If this says Brett Favre boner to you, well, I think you have other issues. But I watch a lot of football, have a pretty accurate eye for talent, and can plain as day see that these QBs are better today than Rodgers.

Did you just call palmer the 8th best qb in the league? You just lost all credibility.