Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fire 1...Coaches, Management, etc.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by wist43
    I picked Sanders, lot of good it would do...

    Even if they made a change at DC, they're likely to keep the same scheme... TT has money invested in the types of players needed to play the current scheme.

    Switch to a 3-4??? They're very weak at LB. Kampman would hold over as a 3-4 DE, but do you want to pay a 3-4 DE that kind of money... he, and his salary would be wasted, the strength of a 3-4 is obviously at LB.

    The corners have been okay... but Woodson and Harris are on their way out. How many more years b/4 we'll have two new starting corners??? Seriously doubt their replacements are on the roster at present??? Maybe Williams...

    Not just the 2008 season... the Packers have some serious long term issues with respect to their roster.
    Same old wist--nothing but negativity. This year you were vindicated, but it was an aberration because of the many injuries, etc. Virtually the same talent is in place--when healthy--that took us to 13-3/14-4 last year.

    This D scheme, with Sanders preferably, but even without him if the negativists get their way--will take the Packers right back to the top--assuming next season isn't snake-bit like this one has been.

    And with the development at LB, I think we could go to a 3-4, even though we likely won't and shouldn't.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

    Comment

    Working...
    X