Woodson & Harris want FAs on D

[sharpe1027]

Re: Woodson & Harris want FAs on D

if we were going percentages we'd add Ben Taylor and Marquand Manuel as well. Was Roman from TT or Shermy ?

Of course the only relevant FA signings where TT paid anything were Woody, Pickett, and Chillar to a point....although he was kind of cheap as well.........maybe this year that means we should look for some more relevant ones

Again, my point is that you have unrealistic expectations for free agency. There are a limited number every year, mostly guys that other teams didn't want to keep. There are 32 teams to compete with.

I don't agree with you because even if the Packers had the most successful free agency of any team over the past 4 years, your analysis would still make it look like they failed.

[RashanGary]

So relevant is a dollar figure? Interesting.

I don't think it has a one to one ratio....but I can tell you if we both stroll into an electronics store and I buy a $4000 plasma and you buy a $900 one it's likely mine kicks your tv's ass. Not for sure, but likely.


edit: Not sure if my analogy is that great though, due to the higher failure rate of FA versus TV. :P

Let's find out how the Jennings deal compares to the Barrian deal. I think we'll find out if the markets are a little different then.