Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which 2008 Packer Non-Starter Will Star in 2009?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Partial
    James Jones. He is going to be a manimal when healthy.
    Wow...I almost always disagree with Partial...but here I totally agree. James Jones - yes, a manimal. A stud. A touchdown machine next year.

    I've always liked the guy. I think he's a big, developing receiver who will catch the ball better and better and take it to the house.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Which 2008 Packer Non-Starter Will Star in 2009?

      Originally posted by Joemailman
      What young player, if any will emerge big time in 2009?

      Would like to wait to vote until after I know the fate of VB
      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Fritz
        Originally posted by Partial
        James Jones. He is going to be a manimal when healthy.
        Wow...I almost always disagree with Partial...but here I totally agree. James Jones - yes, a manimal. A stud. A touchdown machine next year.

        I've always liked the guy. I think he's a big, developing receiver who will catch the ball better and better and take it to the house.

        With all those good receivers is he going to see enough balls to be that guy?

        Comment


        • #19
          Jones to me is already proven...the kid has great hands and is strong after the catch in the open field. When healthy, he is the best #3 WR in the NFL and would make a huge impact if either Driver or Jennings missed any significant time.

          Nelson looks solid too...unfortunately both are stuck behind Driver and Jennings, and they really don't have the chance to emerge as a big time player unless there is an injury to a starter.

          We need someone on the OL to step up...but I couldn't pick one out of the group that seems to have a better chance of success than anyone else. That might not be a good thing.
          My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Rastak
            Originally posted by Fritz
            Originally posted by Partial
            James Jones. He is going to be a manimal when healthy.
            Wow...I almost always disagree with Partial...but here I totally agree. James Jones - yes, a manimal. A stud. A touchdown machine next year.

            I've always liked the guy. I think he's a big, developing receiver who will catch the ball better and better and take it to the house.

            With all those good receivers is he going to see enough balls to be that guy?
            He'll be the third receiver, so I guess we'll see.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Fritz
              Originally posted by Partial
              James Jones. He is going to be a manimal when healthy.
              Wow...I almost always disagree with Partial...but here I totally agree. James Jones - yes, a manimal. A stud. A touchdown machine next year.

              I've always liked the guy. I think he's a big, developing receiver who will catch the ball better and better and take it to the house.
              Same here. JJ seems to be a guy rodgers looks to. When he was hurting I was wondering what happened, but the last 3 weeks he looked like I thought he would be all season.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment

              Working...
              X