Originally posted by DonHutson
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sanders Fired
Collapse
X
-
Nothin' wrong with the Philly/NY Giant version of the 4-3 defense.Originally posted by wist43Really, I'm surprised they pulled the trigger...
Would love to see a scheme change, but they have a lot invested in players that fit the current scheme. Be tough to change... would definitely be growing pains associated with changing schemes.
I don't want a 3-4. Every team is starting to run it. A few years ago the couple teams that ran it had their pick of 3-4 players for cheap and drafting them was easier. Now that half the teams in the NFL run it, it's harder and harder to get those players. The 4-3 is just as good, it just has to have some different looks to it. Philly and the NYG do a great job with mixing it up.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
I am not interested in your ideas and I do not want your newsletter.Originally posted by packers11How ironic/funny would it be if Shotty got promoted... This website would explode...
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
He and Wilde are pals, so I am sure it hasn't escaped Jason's notice. But nothing on the State Journal site yet.Originally posted by cpk1994Since Al Harris's agent runs the website that is reporting this, I think Al might be the first one that should be contacted.Originally posted by pbmaxThey have started to contact players and no one has heard anything from the team.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
I would prefer a defense the utilized both the 3-4 and 4-3 like the Raven's. Today they played more 4-3 vs Miami because they are a running team. Certain teams struggle with the 3-4 schemes, so having that to fall back on in your play book could help cause problems for those teams.Originally posted by JustinHarrellNothin' wrong with the Philly/NY Giant version of the 4-3 defense.Originally posted by wist43Really, I'm surprised they pulled the trigger...
Would love to see a scheme change, but they have a lot invested in players that fit the current scheme. Be tough to change... would definitely be growing pains associated with changing schemes.
I don't want a 3-4. Every team is starting to run it. A few years ago the couple teams that ran it had their pick of 3-4 players for cheap and drafting them was easier. Now that half the teams in the NFL run it, it's harder and harder to get those players. The 4-3 is just as good, it just has to have some different looks to it. Philly and the NYG do a great job with mixing it up.
Comment
-
I'm sure he is working to corrobarate the report first. Bedard only put it in his blog, so he doesn't have journalistic restriction there.Originally posted by pbmaxHe and Wilde are pals, so I am sure it hasn't escaped Jason's notice. But nothing on the State Journal site yet.Originally posted by cpk1994Since Al Harris's agent runs the website that is reporting this, I think Al might be the first one that should be contacted.Originally posted by pbmaxThey have started to contact players and no one has heard anything from the team.
Comment
-
What track record?Originally posted by redwell, because, for a change he is a great defensive coach with a proven track record
thats a decent start
From 1993-2000, he was DC for the Giants, Washington, and the Jets. His defenses were always middle of the road.
In 2001, he joined the Ravens staff. The next year, he became DC for Baltimore--after Marvin Lewis had built up a great defense (one that set all kinds of records in 2000).
Unless I'm reading his bio wrong, not one of the teams he's been with has won a Super Bowl."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat track record?Originally posted by redwell, because, for a change he is a great defensive coach with a proven track record
thats a decent start
From 1993-2000, he was DC for the Giants, Washington, and the Jets. His defenses were always middle of the road.
In 2001, he joined the Ravens staff. The next year, he became DC for Baltimore--after Marvin Lewis had built up a great defense (one that set all kinds of records in 2000).
Unless I'm reading his bio wrong, not one of the teams he's been with has won a Super Bowl.
thats what I was thinking when I questioned why some want him so bad. I mean his team was pitiful in SF the last few years...
Comment
-
The stint I remember was the Redskins job. He was DC for Turner for 4 or 5 years and they had one decent defense. Players or coach I can't say, but it wasn't his stats that kept getting him jobs.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat track record?Originally posted by redwell, because, for a change he is a great defensive coach with a proven track record
thats a decent start
From 1993-2000, he was DC for the Giants, Washington, and the Jets. His defenses were always middle of the road.
In 2001, he joined the Ravens staff. The next year, he became DC for Baltimore--after Marvin Lewis had built up a great defense (one that set all kinds of records in 2000).
Unless I'm reading his bio wrong, not one of the teams he's been with has won a Super Bowl.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PartialI'm not interested in Nolan. No way to Nolan!
Actually heard on Appleton's espn radio station on my way home tonight that many people believe Nolan will be brought in as DC."I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh
Comment


Comment