Packers in good spot

[Guiness]

why would sf give up a later round pick to trade spots with us?

they know we aren't going to draft a qb

so if sanchez is there at #9 he's going to be there at #10 too

TT could tell SF that he is in negotiations with the Jets and is considering moving back to 17 or so in exchange for the Jets' 2nd round pick. He could tell SF he'd swap picks in exchange for a 5th rounder or whatever.

Not very likely IMO, but at least possible.

It's happened in the first round before - just last year, Detroit and KC swapped 15th and 17th picks.

[Pacopete4]

Where are the Rodgers bashers saying we should trade up and get Sanchez?

Is this needed? Plus we have Brohm and Flynn getting ready if he gets hurt or doesn't pan out in the long run...

[sheepshead]

Where are the Rodgers bashers saying we should trade up and get Sanchez?

Is this needed? Plus we have Brohm and Flynn getting ready if he gets hurt or doesn't pan out in the long run...

absurdity 101

[Pacopete4]

Where are the Rodgers bashers saying we should trade up and get Sanchez?

Is this needed? Plus we have Brohm and Flynn getting ready if he gets hurt or doesn't pan out in the long run...

absurdity 101

Quit ruining threads and grow up

[sheepshead]

Where are the Rodgers bashers saying we should trade up and get Sanchez?

Is this needed? Plus we have Brohm and Flynn getting ready if he gets hurt or doesn't pan out in the long run...

absurdity 101

Quit ruining threads and grow up

Didnt think it was possible to ruin a thread. If you didnt like my comment (do a search and you'll appreciate the humor and validity of my point) well then blow it out your ass.

[Pacopete4]

just shut ur trap and stay on the subject and we probably would have less fights around here.. Ur not helping the situation..


On that note, trading down to 17 with the Jets and their 2nd would be awesome to me.. Then u could always package one if our 2nd's and our 3rds to get back in the first round again.. Allowing us to get hopefully two cracks at an impact player.

[cpk1994]

Where are the Rodgers bashers saying we should trade up and get Sanchez?

Is this needed? Plus we have Brohm and Flynn getting ready if he gets hurt or doesn't pan out in the long run...

absurdity 101

Quit ruining threads and grow up

Wow. This post blows my mind.

[sheepshead]

just shut ur trap and stay on the subject and we probably would have less fights around here.. Ur not helping the situation..


On that note, trading down to 17 with the Jets and their 2nd would be awesome to me.. Then u could always package one if our 2nd's and our 3rds to get back in the first round again.. Allowing us to get hopefully two cracks at an impact player.

I was totally on subject. People dont like Aaron Rodgers as our quarterback, maybe we need to draft one. Just sayin'

[cpk1994]

just shut ur trap and stay on the subject and we probably would have less fights around here.. Ur not helping the situation..


On that note, trading down to 17 with the Jets and their 2nd would be awesome to me.. Then u could always package one if our 2nd's and our 3rds to get back in the first round again.. Allowing us to get hopefully two cracks at an impact player.

I was totally on subject. People dont like Aaron Rodgers as our quarterback, maybe we need to draft one. Just sayin'

I think Tank is the only one wanting the Packers to draft a QB.

[Pacopete4]

just shut ur trap and stay on the subject and we probably would have less fights around here.. Ur not helping the situation..


On that note, trading down to 17 with the Jets and their 2nd would be awesome to me.. Then u could always package one if our 2nd's and our 3rds to get back in the first round again.. Allowing us to get hopefully two cracks at an impact player.

I was totally on subject. People dont like Aaron Rodgers as our quarterback, maybe we need to draft one. Just sayin'

I think Tank is the only
one wanting the Packers to draft a QB.

We drafted two good ones last year we are set at QB if Arod doesn't work out or gets hurt. No need for drafting one and the thread is not about drafting one.

[Gunakor]

just shut ur trap and stay on the subject and we probably would have less fights around here.. Ur not helping the situation..


On that note, trading down to 17 with the Jets and their 2nd would be awesome to me.. Then u could always package one if our 2nd's and our 3rds to get back in the first round again.. Allowing us to get hopefully two cracks at an impact player.

I like the logic, but I think we might have a better chance at landing one impact player by drafting at #9. The impact DE's, especially, will be gone by #17 anyway. Normally I'd agree with you that more picks = more chances, but I'm not sure about trading out of the top 10 when our core is already in place. If the guy who could make the greatest impact is available at #9, that's the guy you take IMO.

If, however, #9 rolls around and there aren't any impact DE's left (or at another position of need, that's just the big one that matters most IMO), then absolutely try to get better value for your #9 pick by trading down.

[sheepshead]

just shut ur trap and stay on the subject and we probably would have less fights around here.. Ur not helping the situation..


On that note, trading down to 17 with the Jets and their 2nd would be awesome to me.. Then u could always package one if our 2nd's and our 3rds to get back in the first round again.. Allowing us to get hopefully two cracks at an impact player.

I was totally on subject. People dont like Aaron Rodgers as our quarterback, maybe we need to draft one. Just sayin'

I think Tank is the only
one wanting the Packers to draft a QB.

We drafted two good ones last year we are set at QB if Arod doesn't work out or gets hurt. No need for drafting one and the thread is not about drafting one.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I'm not sure there are any impact DEs available at #9. They all look to be guys that need to grow into becoming good players. I want a stud at #9--whether that's at LB, S, or OT.

[Partial]

Maulaluga!

[Gunakor]

Maulaluga!

Then we'd be paying premium salary to 2 MLB's. Not worth it IMO assuming we keep a 4-3 base defense.

I like Barnett. I hope he gets healthy and be productive going forward. From an experience standpoint, drafting Maulaluga would be a step backward for our LB corps. Barnett is the most experienced guy in our front 7. So he's the starter, and I can't see paying top 10 salary to a backup. Desmond Bishop fills the backup role for a lot less money. Remember, every dollar you spend on one player is a dollar less you have to pay someone else. And there are far greater needs than MLB on this team, which require a much larger investment than I'd be willing to make on another MLB.