PREDICT WHO MM WILL HIRE AS DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR

[TravisWilliams23]

The thing about Nolan I don't like is the attitudes some of his players
developed under his tenure at SF.
Remember when Singletary first took over, he had to really make an
example out of VD to show the rest of the team that if you aren't a
team player your not wanted.
Well, that attitude was "allowed" to fester under Nolan's watch and it just
leaves a bad feeling towards him.
Also, during the pre-season contest this past year, Nolan blitzed the
shit out of A-Rod and the Pack to prove that SF made the "right" choice
when they selected Alex Smith over Rodgers. Prick!

[pbmax]

The thing about Nolan I don't like is the attitudes some of his players
developed under his tenure at SF.
Remember when Singletary first took over, he had to really make an
example out of VD to show the rest of the team that if you aren't a
team player your not wanted.
Well, that attitude was "allowed" to fester under Nolan's watch and it just
leaves a bad feeling towards him.
Also, during the pre-season contest this past year, Nolan blitzed the
shit out of A-Rod and the Pack to prove that SF made the "right" choice
when they selected Alex Smith over Rodgers. Prick!

Perhaps, but I would bet the farm will be untenable over the long haul.

Everyone loves the replacement when you have been playing badly, but it seldom lasts.

[DonHutson]

I vote for D, Ringo Starr.

Oh wait... nevermind.

[Pugger]

Don't you think we should wait until MM has interviewed everyone on his list? I think there are other gentlemen whose teams are still playing that MM has his eye on besides Nolan, Williams and Moss.

[pack4to84]

I think the new DC would be Mike Nolan. I believe MM would be comfortable and not threaten by him like he would be with Williams. MM know he could communicate with Nolan.

My self I like the 3-4. Did any of you watch the Ravens pressure packages out of the 3-4. Very nice!

[rbaloha1]

I think the new DC would be Mike Nolan. I believe MM would be comfortable and not threaten by him like he would be with Williams. MM know he could communicate with Nolan.

My self I like the 3-4. Did any of you watch the Ravens pressure packages out of the 3-4. Very nice!

Personally I also prefer the 3-4. However imo the current Packer personnel does not fit the 3-4 scheme.

Apparently the Saints really like Williams and could finalize quickly.

Given the senior bowl, combine and draft its probably best to sign Nolan asap. Nolan is a proven commodity and devise schemes which fit current personnel.

[texaspackerbacker]

Why do people keep saying the Packers personnel doesn't fit the 3-4 when it so obviously does?

Why do people want to scrap such an obviously successful Defensive scheme after a sadly injury ruined season which undoubtedly would have been much worse without the turnovers generated by the scheme? Are some in here really that damn dumb?

About the only silver lining from the crap luck of all those injuries was the fact that we now have a lot more depth at linebacker than before. We have a highly successful MLB coming back along with a high first round pick that many think is more suited for inside than outside. We have no less than four, maybe as many as six OLBs and DEs with decent coverage skills and/or outside rush capability. We have the one mammoth nose tackle and at least 3 or 4 suitable 3-4 DE type players. All that and probably the best group of man coverage corners in the NFL, along with three very decent safeties.

I'd say we're covered if it's Noaln and he chooses to go 3-4.

[KYPack]

Why do people keep saying the Packers personnel doesn't fit the 3-4 when it so obviously does?

Why do people want to scrap such an obviously successful Defensive scheme after a sadly injury ruined season which undoubtedly would have been much worse without the turnovers generated by the scheme? Are some in here really that damn dumb?

About the only silver lining from the crap luck of all those injuries was the fact that we now have a lot more depth at linebacker than before. We have a highly successful MLB coming back along with a high first round pick that many think is more suited for inside than outside. We have no less than four, maybe as many as six OLBs and DEs with decent coverage skills and/or outside rush capability. We have the one mammoth nose tackle and at least 3 or 4 suitable 3-4 DE type players. All that and probably the best group of man coverage corners in the NFL, along with three very decent safeties.

I'd say we're covered if it's Noaln and he chooses to go 3-4.

Tex,

It isn't "us dummies" that want to make changes. It's Packer management.

They don't think it was all injuries and bad luck that caused the team defense to crash and let us down to a 6-10 record.

TT & MM think it was lousy coaching and poor schemes that lead to our losses. They disagree with you. They don't think everything is hunky dory and all we have to do is get everybody healthy and have a change in our lousy luck.

They think you are 100% wrong and to prove it, they shit canned most of the defensive coaches. I don't know if you get the papers down there, but those coaches you believed in let us down and they fired 'em all.

I guess those in charge of the Packers are stupid ingrates, eh?

[mission]

I voted Nolan but that's not who I want.

[Bretsky]

bump

[Fritz]

But the poll question doesn't say who do you want; it says who do you think MM will hire.

I am, sadly, beginning to think it's going to end up being Moss.

That'd be too weird. Fire nearly everyone on defense and special teams...and promote the assistants.

Ucky.

[texaspackerbacker]

Why do people keep saying the Packers personnel doesn't fit the 3-4 when it so obviously does?

Why do people want to scrap such an obviously successful Defensive scheme after a sadly injury ruined season which undoubtedly would have been much worse without the turnovers generated by the scheme? Are some in here really that damn dumb?

About the only silver lining from the crap luck of all those injuries was the fact that we now have a lot more depth at linebacker than before. We have a highly successful MLB coming back along with a high first round pick that many think is more suited for inside than outside. We have no less than four, maybe as many as six OLBs and DEs with decent coverage skills and/or outside rush capability. We have the one mammoth nose tackle and at least 3 or 4 suitable 3-4 DE type players. All that and probably the best group of man coverage corners in the NFL, along with three very decent safeties.

I'd say we're covered if it's Noaln and he chooses to go 3-4.

Tex,

It isn't "us dummies" that want to make changes. It's Packer management.

They don't think it was all injuries and bad luck that caused the team defense to crash and let us down to a 6-10 record.

TT & MM think it was lousy coaching and poor schemes that lead to our losses. They disagree with you. They don't think everything is hunky dory and all we have to do is get everybody healthy and have a change in our lousy luck.

They think you are 100% wrong and to prove it, they shit canned most of the defensive coaches. I don't know if you get the papers down there, but those coaches you believed in let us down and they fired 'em all.

I guess those in charge of the Packers are stupid ingrates, eh?

KY, I didn't see this post until now.

I'd say the jury is still out on what Thompson and McCarthy are thinking. I have to admit, I don't like the signs of what I've seen up to now about a replacement, but basically, all we have up to now is probably bias speculation from a bunch of guys who think like you and the rest of the Sanders lynch mob.

I'm still hopeful for a miracle, but I'm not optimistic.

I'm feeling like I'm running through a gauntlet--getting closer to surviving every time one of these blitz-happy fools ends up with some other team.

I'll laugh my ass off if McCarthy ends up disappointing all you guys and picks somebody decent. It probably won't happen, though. You'll probably get the kind of clown you want, and we all will be worse off for it.

[Fritz]

Why do people keep saying the Packers personnel doesn't fit the 3-4 when it so obviously does?

Why do people want to scrap such an obviously successful Defensive scheme after a sadly injury ruined season which undoubtedly would have been much worse without the turnovers generated by the scheme? Are some in here really that damn dumb?

About the only silver lining from the crap luck of all those injuries was the fact that we now have a lot more depth at linebacker than before. We have a highly successful MLB coming back along with a high first round pick that many think is more suited for inside than outside. We have no less than four, maybe as many as six OLBs and DEs with decent coverage skills and/or outside rush capability. We have the one mammoth nose tackle and at least 3 or 4 suitable 3-4 DE type players. All that and probably the best group of man coverage corners in the NFL, along with three very decent safeties.

I'd say we're covered if it's Noaln and he chooses to go 3-4.

Tex,

It isn't "us dummies" that want to make changes. It's Packer management.

They don't think it was all injuries and bad luck that caused the team defense to crash and let us down to a 6-10 record.

TT & MM think it was lousy coaching and poor schemes that lead to our losses. They disagree with you. They don't think everything is hunky dory and all we have to do is get everybody healthy and have a change in our lousy luck.

They think you are 100% wrong and to prove it, they shit canned most of the defensive coaches. I don't know if you get the papers down there, but those coaches you believed in let us down and they fired 'em all.

I guess those in charge of the Packers are stupid ingrates, eh?

KY, I didn't see this post until now.

I'd say the jury is still out on what Thompson and McCarthy are thinking. I have to admit, I don't like the signs of what I've seen up to now about a replacement, but basically, all we have up to now is probably bias speculation from a bunch of guys who think like you and the rest of the Sanders lynch mob.

I'm still hopeful for a miracle, but I'm not optimistic.

I'm feeling like I'm running through a gauntlet--getting closer to surviving every time one of these blitz-happy fools ends up with some other team.

I'll laugh my ass off if McCarthy ends up disappointing all you guys and picks somebody decent. It probably won't happen, though. You'll probably get the kind of clown you want, and we all will be worse off for it.

Tex, is it possible you're getting even grumpier?

[Badgerinmaine]

Looks like we needed a "none of the above" choice. :P

[Carolina_Packer]

I predict Dom Capers!