Originally posted by TennesseePackerBacker
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who Should TT Pick at #9?
Collapse
X
-
Well, i could see that, except if TT has scouted a guy, met his mom etc etc, who am I to say that wasnt the right pick? I know lots of guys enjoy this time of year, but I dont get it and wont pretend to know more than TT and in particular his staff. I can name guys that I liked in college but I had no way of knowing if the guys that were picked ahead of him were better. So you go to some guys scouting report online and then go to boards and say he's the guy!! Seems like a lot of speculation and you cant possibly make a better pick than TT can. But, thats just me.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerIt's more a question of making a value judgment of what position we need, then going by scouting reports as to who is the best at those spots. A lot of people have had access to these guys, though--Raji in the Senior Bowl, Brown against the Badgers, Jenkins, Vontae Davis, and Maybin in the Big Ten, etc. I have seen Baylor, and their guy wasn't all that impressive. I have seen Orakpo 4 or 5 times, and was not impressed at all. We also have all had the opportunity to see the USC players.Originally posted by KYPackI always think the same thing.Originally posted by sheepsheadDo you guys really watch this much college football to have an opinion on everyone of these guys? If so, how do you watch wake, baylor and ol miss enough to make a judgment or am I missing something?
There is no way I could keep track of all this shit.
Some of these guys do it, though.
I'd have to say, most of these big names didn't exactly distinguish themselves when I saw them. Raji is the exception, but with him, you have to ask, was he just super-motivated that day to move up and get a lot more money? If so, it worked.Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
Comment
-
Explain. Every site I've seen says he could do both relatively easily.Originally posted by Kyle.McCarrollWe have a need for 3-4 OLB's. Curry is far from a 3-4 OLB. No thanks.Originally posted by TennesseePackerBackerCurry for me. We have a huge need for OLB help now and he's the best on the board. Raji is 2nd."I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
A lot will depend on whether the 2 top QB's (Stafford and Sanchez) get picked early. If they do, then only 4 of the players in this poll will have been picked when the Packers turn comes. The top 3 teams, Detroit, St.Louis and Kansas City, would be the ones likely to be looking for a QB.Originally posted by DonHutsonThe latest McShay mock had Jason Smith going #2, and Raji going #4. That would rattle some assumptions in our little poll. Curry, Jenkins, and Andre Smith were gone as well.
For what it's worth, he had us taking Eugene Monroe - ahead of all the pass rushers. I'd be happy enough with that.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
I would be disappointed if Thompson traded up to get somebody, I dont' really see there as being anybody worth trading up for in this draft. If Raji's there at 9, great. If he's not, then somebody else will be there at 9.Originally posted by The ShadowI am beginnin to get the vague sense that to get BJ (if that's Thompson's intention), he might have to slide up a couple of notches, perhaps at the cost of one of those #3's.</delurk>
Comment
-
I voted to trade down. I would like Raji at the pick, but in all likely hood he'll be gone. I also wouldn't mind seeing Jenkins, but once again he'll be gone. The only OL of the "top 3" I would like to see the Packers get is Oher, and he has a good chance of being gone too. I'd like to see them trade down a bit, not too far, and pick up Rey. I think he's a bit of a stretch at #9, but from the 15-20 range he'd be a great pick up. Then we could move Barnett to OLB and that would eliminate the need for that position... Just a thought.
Comment
-
sheepshead, I didn't mean to suggest I favored taking Raji--just that his great game in the Senior Bowl moved him way up on a lot of charts--which probably means a lot more money for him. I still favor Jenkins or Vontae Davis, and I really don't have a good handle on who Thompson might have in mind. I'm not sure he does at this point, but I agree, he does his homework, and will make a good choice.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
I know a lot of guys have fun with the draft. I was in NYC 2 years ago during it. It's a big deal and that's fine. It's one of those things I can't contribute to except maybe by position, but even then I think there is so much more that goes into those decisions that we dont see. Not trying to hijack the thread or anything or harsh anyone's gig.Originally posted by texaspackerbackersheepshead, I didn't mean to suggest I favored taking Raji--just that his great game in the Senior Bowl moved him way up on a lot of charts--which probably means a lot more money for him. I still favor Jenkins or Vontae Davis, and I really don't have a good handle on who Thompson might have in mind. I'm not sure he does at this point, but I agree, he does his homework, and will make a good choice.Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
Comment
-
Personally, I think Rey is a 2-down linebacker in this league. He's a run specialist who's going to be a liability in the passing game, and he's pretty much exclusively an inside thumper. He's a fiery physical intimidator, but we already had a very similar player on the roster in Abdul Hodge and couldn't find a place for him to play, even after he was healthy. Plus 2-down run specialists can be found in the later rounds (like Hodge), not ones as good as Maualuga, but guys who are about 75%-90% as effective as run stoppers (Bishop may be close and he's already on the roster). Considering that our ILBs in this scheme are going to be Hawk and Barnett, neither of which have the size to be an OLB in this defense but have perfect size, quickness, and athleticism to play ILB in this scheme, Maualuga just doesn't seem to be a great fit. Not saying he's not going to be a great player, but I don't think he's a great fit here. Particularly since ILB is one of the lowest priority needs on the defense for this offseason, NT, DE, and OLB are significantly higher priorities since we don't need three guys who are first round picks for two ILB spots.Originally posted by PackerPro42I'd like to see them trade down a bit, not too far, and pick up Rey.
He ought to get drafted by a 4-3 team as a Mike with a scheme that won't give him coverage responsibilities, and then he'll be an amazing player. In terms of "USC Linebackers" Cushing would be a better fit in the Capers defense, in all honesty, but he has all sorts of red flags and is more of a second round guy.
If we were going to trade back into the 15-20 range, I'd think a guy like Tyson Jackson (DE), Peria Jerry (DE), Aaron Maybin (pass rushing OLB), or Knowshon Moreno (who has a chance to be a truly amazing ZBS RB) would be better.
Personally, I hope we just stay at 9 and get the best player there. Of Smith, Smith, Monroe, Raji, Jenkins, and Curry we have a sizeable chance of landing one of them (since one of the QBs and Crabtree are virtually guaranteed to go before we pick, and it's not improbable that somebody takes a DE before we pick, too.) If Smith, Smith, Monroe, Raji, Stafford, Jenkins, Curry, and Crabtree are picks 1-8 (in some order) though, that's a tough position and it would probably be worth trading down with somebody who needs a DE if Thompson isn't high on Oher or one of the pass-rushers. Knowshon might not be an insane pick at that point, though it kind of goes against the ZBS's main advantage of "not requiring premium picks for RBs".</delurk>
Comment
-
I would be a bit disappointed if TT traded up just to get a BJ.Originally posted by The ShadowI am beginnin to get the vague sense that to get BJ (if that's Thompson's intention), he might have to slide up a couple of notches, perhaps at the cost of one of those #3's.
Comment
-
WaffleOriginally posted by TheRavenI would be a bit disappointed if TT traded up just to get a BJ.Originally posted by The ShadowI am beginnin to get the vague sense that to get BJ (if that's Thompson's intention), he might have to slide up a couple of notches, perhaps at the cost of one of those #3's.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
These guys are crazy, this guy is a LT plain and simple. 6'6 330 beast with quick feet.Originally posted by ND72I picked Michael Oher. I've read McShay & Kiper both say he projects more to a solid Guard in the NFL than an OT. Colledge is a tackle, so we move him, and draft Oher and put him at LG.If you're not a Packer fan, you're not a football fan!
Comment

Comment